Right, pay attention to what you quoted. Secularism is a religion of a sort, and it is doing its best to “prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Look at what they are doing to the people that went to the TEA parties, look at what they are doing if you wish to practice your beliefs. They are doing their best to eliminate the peoples right to free speech, assembly, and worship under the guise of political correctness.
Agreed, that's what the principle of it is; however, after talking with a friend of mine who is actively involved in the Tea parties, and has been -- mind you -- for years. (Libertarians have been doing these for six or so years, so it's not a new thing). He is telling me that they're being manipulated for various purposes; political, monetary, racist, etc.
My point in asking that of Paladin is to try to understand what his assumptions are. It seems to me, that he was making the claim that Secularists are trying to do something to them.
Because the American culture is one that believes in God. God is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence as well as our money. We as a nation believe in God, the founders believed in God, and they felt that submission to God is what is best. Look at it this way, if there is no god then who is being hurt? If there is a God that is all powerful do you really want to piss him off?
You know, I think this argument is going to give me a freaking ulcer. So, I'm going to explain this clearly so that even a kindergartener who has repeated the grade can understand it, and then I'm going to take up smoking...
Just kidding, a little humor...
1. American culture, by your logic, would believe in YWH, Buddha, etc. as well. American culture, is more than just Christianity, it is Buddhistm, Taoism, Confucism, etc. It is also: Japan, China, Russia, etc. It is every person that comes into this country and contributes to it. So, bluntly, you are flat out full of shit. American culture is not as you say, not in the context you put it in at least.
2. The Declaration of Independence is not a legally binding document; it was - frankly - a declartion of principles and grievances toward King George. It has no, so far as I know, not a legal document as to set a precedent on.
3. Even then; however, the Declaration of Independence states God once, and only once. The context however, is this:
"When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." Laws of nature, and nature's God; that sounds Deist, not Theist. Hmm, no real precedent there.
4. Uh, nope. Certain individuals may believe in God, but I do not believe in it and nor do I appreciate people telling me that I supposibly do, when I do not. Sorry, but my freedom of religion (or no religion), is paramount to me. You don't like Obama saying we're not a Christian nation? Then by the very princple of your dislike, you should not make the claim that we as a nation believe in God. The nation, the United States, is a pluralistic society, it's time you folks get that. We're not all one thing, we're a plethora of differences.
5.
Part One:
The founders may or may not have found in God; however, with a few exceptions 1) Being part of a church does not necessarily mean that they are religious. 2) It's hard in some cases to decipher some of the founding father's religious beliefs.
However, that being said, the founding fathers obviously had the intentions of setting of a secular government, otherwise they would have set up some sort of theocracy instead. There was submission to God only on a personal level. They did not, as their predecessors from England had experienced, persecuter, subject, or force (any) religoin on the people of the colonies.
They understood the diversity.
Part Two:
That being said, when it comes to the motto and the pledge of allegiance: Sorry, but the pledge of allegiance was written in 1892 by Francis Bellamy (a Christian, and a socialist oddly enough). 1892? that's well over one hundred years since the Constitution convention and Declaration.
However, even with that revalation (no pun intended), the words "under God," were not added until about 59 years later, by the effosts of the Knights of Columbus (a religious fraternity btw) and others. It seems to me that this was pushed through without much notice to the people. I would think, that in the best interests of the people, such a thing should be made well known.
Part Three:
The motto, IGWT, was brought about due to the increase of religious upheaval, during the Civil War. Psychologically, and sociologically the upheavel is understandable because of the time and era. However, the time is passed and there is no need what-so-ever for it. The government, by saying that, has essentially said "Yup, we favor this religion." There is no excuse for that, it violates the First Amendment plain and simple.
6.
Look at it this way, if there is no god then who is being hurt? If there is a God that is all powerful do you really want to piss him off?
Uh, sorry, but that was a stupid comment. A lot of people have been hurt. You don't see Atheists proudly being themselves do you now? Do you remember when - i believe it was Bush - stated tht he did not consider Atheists to be Americans? Hello, a president should not say that.
How about people who were killed by Christian gunmen, abortion bombers, etc. How about the religious violence in all parts of the world in the name of God?
Free will and the right to choose; just as you have had the right to choose your God, we, non-religious individuals have the right to not choose a God, or those who are of a different religion.