I disagree, I think you're just paranoid. Most of the stuff I read from you is really snarky and false. There is nothing wrong with the wording of this poll there is nothing wrong with it at all. You're wrong, a walk along non-founder* like myself is neutral for a can't play the game. That didn't stop me from voting.
I sorry that you feel that way. I do not intend to write snarky comments, I write them as clearly as I can without insult, but being a mathematician I find that I come off the wrong way on a lot of people when I speak or write. It is not my intention.
I do not speak from paranoia. If I speak falsely, is it when I said that wording of the poll can cause bias? I never suggested that there was something wrong with the wording of the poll, but the implications one can make from the wording of this particular poll.
I'm not wrong in that you were able to take the poll, in fact I didn't suggest that you couldn't take the poll. My point was about the population of the poll. What is the target population of the poll? The poll is supposed to suggest something about the target population, what is that population? Once you identify that population, you then identify the biases that can be introduced by that poll. I only suggested a few, but there are many that can be incorporated.
When the poll is done, I would be curious where it all stands and what can be inferred from the poll. As this is something I find interesting, the idea of polling. I like to know where this ends up and what the final results turn out to be.
