You disappoint me President Bush

President Hu Jintao of China standing with Bush makes me sick

from JoeUser Forums
President Bush, how could you? Just standing with President Hu Jintao of China basically co-signs some of the worse human degradation on the planet.

Jails abound with people speaking their minds.

Forced abortion is the order of the day.

Child slave workers are becoming the norm in China!

People just suddenly disappear into the void, never to be seen or heard from again.

Censorship of news and common reading material is ENFORCED!

There is a huge trade deficit with China, as we keep buying more and more cheap Chinese goods and they have not even begun to buy from us what they promised when we granted them favored nation status.

How can you begin to even invite him to the center of Democracy on the entire planet george?

You do not seem to understand that the Chinese want to bury america, either in debt or more lethal actions.

The Chinese obstruct every move we try to make through the United Nations.

The Chinese are our enemy President Bush and to watch you fawn over him makes me sorry I voted for you in 2004.

10,623 views 44 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Who would you have voted for?  IN reality, Politics is politics.
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
It sickens me. There hasn't been a President with a hardline stance against China in decades. Not Republicans, not Democrats. We approve the sale of equipment they use to oppress their people, we try to make sure the pigs don't see protesters when they come here. The Senate pretends to have a problem with them and then gives them most favored trade status.

In the end they are a market of 1.3 billion people, and that is worth more to the people in charge of business and the government. The government in China won't last, though. Through reform or revolution it will change, and I wonder how those folks will look back on our coddling their taskmasters.
Offworld Trading Company
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
I have to agree with you ModMan. The pandering just pisses me off.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
#1 by Dr. Guy
Thursday, April 20, 2006


Who would you have voted for? IN reality, Politics is politics.


I think I might have abstained doc, for sure I would have jabbed knitting needles in my eyes before I would have voted for the traitorous Hanoijohn
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
#2 by BakerStreet
Thursday, April 20, 2006


It sickens me. There hasn't been a President with a hardline stance against China in decades. Not Republicans, not Democrats. We approve the sale of equipment they use to oppress their people, we try to make sure the pigs don't see protesters when they come here. The Senate pretends to have a problem with them and then gives them most favored trade status.

In the end they are a market of 1.3 billion people


sickens me too baker and it's 2.3 billion
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
3 by BlueDev
Thursday, April 20, 2006


have to agree with you ModMan. The pandering just pisses me off.


how could he do that? geeze he could have done it in private. grrrrrrrrr
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
I agree it was a sickening sight to see our President treating the President of China like a great leader.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
Eh, it's politics. You'd have to be very lucky to find a politician who wouldn't make friends with a child-raping dictator if it served his purpose. They're all as bad as each other and it's got to the stage where there's barely a difference of degree as well.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
7 by COL Gene
Thursday, April 20, 2006


agree it was a sickening sight to see our President treating the President of China like a great leader.


yes this is two times in two days we have agreed on an issue...Now I am scared...lol
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
8 by cactoblasta
Thursday, April 20, 2006


Eh, it's politics. You'd have to be very lucky to find a politician who wouldn't make friends with a child-raping dictator if it served his purpose. They're all as bad as each other and it's got to the stage where there's barely a difference of degree as well.


I must disagree it's not politics, it's down right pandering. disgusting. and yes it is getting to be that you can exchange one leader from one country to another and there is no real difference.

Insightful cacto!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
it's down right pandering


Read Kautilya and you'll see that even back in pre-Roman days pandering was the name of the game. The only thing that changes in politics are the players, not the nature of the game.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
11 by cactoblasta
Thursday, April 20, 2006


it's down right pandering


Read Kautilya and you'll see that even back in pre-Roman days pandering was the name of the game. The only thing that changes in politics are the players, not the nature of the game.


pandering according to the law in new york city is a crime...living off the proceeds of a prostitute,, se any simularities between scum and politicians now?
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
At least the b$%t*^d didn't get a free state dinner and only got a lunch enstead.

Maybe it was not a slight at all, but Bush trying to cut Governmental spending after all.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
13 by Lee1776
Thursday, April 20, 2006


At least the b$%t*^d didn't get a free state dinner and only got a lunch enstead.

Maybe it was not a slight at all, but Bush trying to cut Governmental spending after all.


good one!!! have a cookie on me.. lmao
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
China has also been cited for allowing the trade in body parts. There was an article in the Sydney Morning Herald this week about them killing criminals for pre-ordered body parts.

John Howard is not much better, bending over and letting the Indonesian president tell him what to do. The whole lot of them are a sad, sorrow bunch, but as Cacto said, it doesn't surprise me. Besides, a photo opportunity is a photo opportunity...
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
China has also been cited for allowing the trade in body parts. There was an article in the Sydney Morning Herald this week about them killing criminals for pre-ordered body parts.


Yeah I read about that. It's good business sense but still... I didn't think the Chinese would sink so low. Do you reckon they still send a bill for the bullets/injection to the family? Or does the family get the bill for the operation as well?
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: dynamasoPosted: Friday, April 21, 2006China has also been cited for allowing the trade in body parts. There was an article in the Sydney Morning Herald this week about them killing criminals for pre-ordered body parts.John Howard is not much better, bending over and letting the Indonesian president tell him what to do. The whole lot of them are a sad, sorrow bunch, but as Cacto said, it doesn't surprise me. Besides, a photo opportunity is a photo opportunity...


I am starting a petition for a "hunt your politician day" One day a year us common folk get th thin the herd.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: cactoblastaPosted: Friday, April 21, 2006China has also been cited for allowing the trade in body parts. There was an article in the Sydney Morning Herald this week about them killing criminals for pre-ordered body parts.Yeah I read about that. It's good business sense but still... I didn't think the Chinese would sink so low. Do you reckon they still send a bill for the bullets/injection to the family? Or does the family get the bill for the operation as well?


did you see the single chinese protestor? No one in china did as the people in power literally pulled the plug on all the TV stations.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
You write about a lot of different subjects I like the way you write, even if I don't agree with you ata least half the time.

I think that you nailed this article about Bush and the Chinese.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
Wow, an article that even Col can feel proud of. This is actually one thing I would never forgive any President, to walk around acting like good buddies with a guy who's a dictator. This is one time I agree with Col about adding more money to the deficit when it comes to feeding and accommodating this shameful person, the President of China. Not once have I seen this country act like our friends, it;s obvious they hate us and want to damage use financially. This is a sad day for us.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
#20 by Charles.C
Friday, April 21, 2006


Wow, an article that even Col can feel proud of. This is actually one thing I would never forgive any President, to walk around acting like good buddies with a guy who's a dictator. This is one time I agree with Col about adding more money to the deficit when it comes to feeding and accommodating this shameful person, the President of China. Not once have I seen this country act like our friends, it;s obvious they hate us and want to damage use financially. This is a sad day for us.


except when I point out faults in the President, it gets taken seriously, where as if gene was to write an article about anything BUT BUSH, the whole of Joeuser would keel over dead. heh heh
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
I notice a lot of people here expand their articles to many categories here, I myself have made articles for at least half of the categories and plan on making at least one for each. But Col, he has enclosed himself in the political world and even more into the Bush Twilight Zone. There's not an article he can't write that will not link to and blame Bush for it. I don't even know why he's a Colonel. I don't know any of his accomplishment or if he even has had any war experience. All I know is that he hates Bush and denies it also. Oh well life goes on.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
#22 by Charles.C
Friday, April 21, 2006


I notice a lot of people here expand their articles to many categories here,


I try to be a little diverse, but I must face the facts that mostly I am an political animal or as tex would say "MM writes with passion, he could improve spelling and grammar, he writes about many things but politics is his meat and potatoes" {slightly paraphrased}
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
It's not Col's article so he's not interested.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
It's not Col's article so he's not interested.


Yea this would be the first time he doesn't get point for an article bashing Bush. Well maybe not the first, but when it becomes a habbit.