the research 'S' curve

yet another realism we must consider. after each fundamental break through there is a time where technology is slow to appear based on the break through, until a firm grasp of a new technology is realized. then a period of fast developement where new devices becomes available based on the key technology. research into new technology then slows until another fundamental break through.

take batteries for example.

Lead Acid: HEAVY, LARGE, unsutable for portable devices, must be kept in a fully charged state or the batery fails.

Alkaline: not rechargeable, decent capacity. capacity increased over time but soonm surpassed by ni-cad

Ni-cads. should be kept chared after use, initialy lower capacity for weight, slow charge. after years of use and continued research, charge rates got faster, capacities grew and surpassed alkaline.

Ni-MH. better capacity than ni-cads, lighter weight, can be stored discharged. almost 3 times the capacity of ni-cads and still growing.

Li-ION even better still than NI-MH. though slower charging, the capacity is increased almost two fold initially in the same size container. weight is DRASTICALLY reduced and capacity is growing fast still today. a few problems with this tech today include the need for built in electronics to keep the battery from dropping below 2v per cell or else the battery is destroyed, special chargers ( infrastructer problem )

tommorows battery? who knows. the fundamental science is being done today. goals: more capacity, faster charging, lighter weight, longer life, cheaper construction. major indications are that batteries as we know them may be a dying breed, unless a major breakthrough occurs. the most likely successor at this point is a new line of technology itself. minature fuel cells. you'll start to see them in cell phones next year. you can already buy after market ones already ( though the manufacturer is not marketing them under the fuel cell name, they are simply sold as HIGH capacity disposables )



142 views 5 replies
Reply #1 Top
I think this might be true for some techs, like batteries, but not all. Look at the
advances in computers since the first electronic one in 1946. The progression has
ben nothing but exponential.

Cheers,
Jack
Reply #2 Top
you are wrong there. we are merely in the steepest portion of the curve in regards to silicon chips and lithography production techniques. we are going to reach the top of that S curve in about 3 years ( so the research shows )
Reply #3 Top
3 years? That sounds familiear. Having been in the computer industry from 1967 until I retired at hte end of 1999
I kept hearing those words "it will slow down in xx years". It never happened. It may yet, but I will wait until
I see it happen before I believe it will.

Cheers,
Jack
Reply #4 Top
The reason it hasn't happened is due to NEW technologies coming on line. THe computer industry is very different beacuse it has billions of dollars spent looking ahead and researching and developing technologies before they are needed.

I agree with jlegere though. I would love to see research and development seperated. Basic research you just spend money in, give some general directional guidelines and wait to see ehat pops up. Applied research and development takes the basic research and attempts to understand it better and develop it into a form you can use. Here you can choose the end goal (faster engines) and spend the money towards that goal. You can usually know if the goal is achieveable, but not necessarily for how long or how much.

Paul.
Reply #5 Top
You also forgot to mention that LI-ION batteries don't get memories.