Each his own, a serious gamer doesn't use 98 except as a Drink coaster.
End of quote
I don't know about that, either. I know many people who refuse to upgrade to XP because of various game incompatibilities. Windows 98 will run most games more quickly because of its deficiencies, believe it or not.
XP controls multitasking. Great for stability because it tells the programs when to run and when to wait. A misbehaving app cannot hog the CPU which means that if the program hangs, it doesn't take the OS down with it. The flip side, of course, is that a game cannot hog the CPU, which means it has to share CPU time. Windows 98, on the other hand, relies on the apps to control their own multitasking, and games can hog the CPU time all they want, making them run more quickly. This is the major source of all game oddities from choppy sound to lockups in games in Windows XP.
Windos 98 makes use of vxd's to make calls directly to the hardware, bypassing the OS. This is great for speed, but if the vxd misbehaves, your OS is going to lock. Windows XP doesn't allow direct calls to the hardware. All calls to the hardware MUST go through the OS. Great for reliability, but since you have a middleman to go through, it's slower. (Note: many hardware drivers are now being based on Windows Driver Models, and no longer make vxd's for Windows 98, so the advantage isn't so clear in this department any more.)
Mind you, even being an avid gamer, I would still load XP onto a new rig even if it were to be an exclusive gaming machine; however, if Windows 98 still runs your games fine, then gaming isn't a compelling reason to upgrade.
~SDC~