I just had a wonderful FFA Game, but I'm stuck on the fact that we need that new diplomacy system (Having to "ally" to buy off an attacker sucks...)! Oh, and it ended up a series of 2V1s... with me being the 1 most of the time. I doubt that can be fixed, but it sucks!
13,160 views 6 replies
Reply #1 Top
Cool game to watch, you really were the better player there, taking on 2 of them. But i liked how orange agreed with you evil plans and then proceeded to backstab you.

But i think 3 player ffa never work, 2 weaker guys gang up on the stronger one, and it can take forever to grind him down.
Reply #2 Top
I see that the one doing the trouncing (usually Ron) was immediately attacked by the third party when it was hopeless for the underdog, which is how it should be in a FFA. But it can of course get to be really long games that way. I like what Ron says about not having to be allied to pay tribute.
Reply #3 Top
I like what Ron says about not having to be allied to pay tribute.
End of quote


Yeah, well, I would have gone on for a lot longer about it if it weren't for the Dev's promising the new diplomacy system "soon".
Reply #4 Top
WOW this game had the REAL free for all kind of game, with backstabbing, double crossings, and luring cash out of one player haha LOVE IT

I give it 9/10 because of the fun and how a ffa should be
Reply #5 Top
LoL, tnx guys. that was a sweet game there Ron. i had tons of fun and thrawny, he knows the deal why i had to do what i had to to break off our first alliance 

LOVED IT. GG guys! 
Reply #6 Top
I wish I had this kind of FFA, mine have sucked lately.

New pet peeve map: Gateway