Strategy for beginners
from
Stardock Forums
I just won my first game on simple level (Final frontier victory).
A few observations.
I found that star systems were only militarily and industrially productive when they have 3 fully equipped star bases in the same sector augmenting them,.....
...... however, I also found that these augmented star systems, whilst productive, ran at a massive loss after a while. The more productive star systems you have, the bigger the loss.
How to solve this problem? well I figured if I'm already running at a loss, I might as well run at a big loss. I put my spending level up at 100%. Thereafter, I balanced the books by selling my advanced technology and star ships to the minor races (scotlingas and I-league). At one point I was receiving 20,000 a month in tribute, dwarfing what I was getting in tax revenue. So again I decided "well if taxes aren't making much money for me, might as well get rid of them".
This meant I needed even more money. In order to get this I would "sell" a planet to a major power in a sector where I was culturally dominant in exchange for techs and star ships which I would again sell on to the minor powers for more tribute. I would thereafter get my planet back quickly as the inhabitants would rebel because of my dominant culture influence..... Basically I ran the galaxy with the kind of budget deficit George Bush can only dream of.
You see where I'm going with this. I even started terraforming planets with the express purpose of selling them. The problems this gave me......
1) I was COMPLETELY dependent on the minor powers.
2) I had to maintain a galactic status-quo in order to prevent the minor powers from being swallowed up and keep the major powers rich enough to buy my wares.
What I would like to know is, how do I maintain my empire without being financially dependent on anyone else in the game?? (It felt like a kind of bizarre symbiosis).
Also, what are the optimum ratios for research, military and social? What order should techs be researched in? What order should improvements be built? And finally, which social improvements are simply a waste of money?
cheers
A few observations.
I found that star systems were only militarily and industrially productive when they have 3 fully equipped star bases in the same sector augmenting them,.....
...... however, I also found that these augmented star systems, whilst productive, ran at a massive loss after a while. The more productive star systems you have, the bigger the loss.
How to solve this problem? well I figured if I'm already running at a loss, I might as well run at a big loss. I put my spending level up at 100%. Thereafter, I balanced the books by selling my advanced technology and star ships to the minor races (scotlingas and I-league). At one point I was receiving 20,000 a month in tribute, dwarfing what I was getting in tax revenue. So again I decided "well if taxes aren't making much money for me, might as well get rid of them".
This meant I needed even more money. In order to get this I would "sell" a planet to a major power in a sector where I was culturally dominant in exchange for techs and star ships which I would again sell on to the minor powers for more tribute. I would thereafter get my planet back quickly as the inhabitants would rebel because of my dominant culture influence..... Basically I ran the galaxy with the kind of budget deficit George Bush can only dream of.
You see where I'm going with this. I even started terraforming planets with the express purpose of selling them. The problems this gave me......
1) I was COMPLETELY dependent on the minor powers.
2) I had to maintain a galactic status-quo in order to prevent the minor powers from being swallowed up and keep the major powers rich enough to buy my wares.
What I would like to know is, how do I maintain my empire without being financially dependent on anyone else in the game?? (It felt like a kind of bizarre symbiosis).
Also, what are the optimum ratios for research, military and social? What order should techs be researched in? What order should improvements be built? And finally, which social improvements are simply a waste of money?
cheers