Our Criminal Justice System

and the changes we need to make

I have been remiss of posting lately so I thought I'd write about something that would stir up some strong feelings.

I think that as far as the court room goes thing are pretty much alright up until we get to the punishment phase of things. I think that we go to soft on criminals. Some of the changes that I think that we should make are as follow.

1. Someone that has commited murder and had their two appeals should be walked out into the courtyard and shot not taken back to jail for God knows how long costing taxpayer more money.

2. Anybody that has been convicted three times for the same offense a.k.a. three strikes should be shot as they have proven that they will not be reabilitated.

Yes I see that the above changes would in the short term certainly cause a raise in homicides and sucides as well as endangering people more especially police because criminals will do everything they can not to be caught but in the long term I believe that the drop in all crime rates would be dramatic. Yes I am also aware that the Justice system makes mistakes and innocent people get convicted. For that reason people get their appeals but we have to face facts we are human and make mistakes but not dealing with crimes such as these in a harsh manner is the biggest mistake being made.
6,360 views 4 replies
Reply #1 Top
I think you're overstating punishment--though, I have no sympathy for a serial killer like Saddam who should get the death penalty, simply because he really has no defense and is guilty beyond a doubt. But when there's doubt lurking, we should show leniency.
Reply #3 Top
Actually, I somehow agree with Changeling1971. Take a look at the criminal justice system of Singapore. Criminals CANNOT be dealt with leniency, except for trivial matters of course.

With our system, you can walk out on the streets at 1am without having the fear of getting shot or getting robbed.

The problem of making mistakes in the prosecution of criminals, look at the ratio of real crimes being commited all the time, to that of an innocent being jailed. If because of this you want to be lenient to criminals, I would say that it is foolish. Because more innocent would then be harmed if you let them off easily.

I'm a Singaporean
Reply #4 Top
Well, there's that saying that it's better to let one hundred criminals walk free than lock up one innocent person, but then it does make sense that if we let one hundred criminals walk free to free one innocent life, we're going to be jeopardizing many more innocent lives than just one, and although one might think it cruel to sacrifice one innocent life for any reason, I really think that if people had to choose between one person dying and many more people (including children) dying, they'd choose the former. Catch 22.