Say what you will, alive or dead, Bin Laden has won.  In what can only be termed a capitulation to terrorism, Random House has pulled a book because it was not according to the Koran.

The real sad part is all the people that have lost their lives to defend the spineless mealy mouthed losers who made the decision.  It may be the last free decision they are capable of making.

5,327 views 18 replies
Reply #1 Top

Will they start pulling books because they violate the Bible? If so, I have a list.

Reply #2 Top

Quoting erathoniel, reply 1
Will they start pulling books because they violate the Bible? If so, I have a list.
End of erathoniel's quote

It is because Christian's do not burn down the publishing house. You're not thinking of rioting are you?

"spineless mealy mouthed losers"

The only think behind them and above them is their asses :HOT:

Reply #3 Top

They havent won yet, its just one more battle under thier belt. We still got alot going for us.

Reply #4 Top

Will they start pulling books because they violate the Bible? If so, I have a list.
End of quote

I hope to hell not, but with the "equal abrogation of rights" that some seem to think makes things "fair", I would not be surprised.

Reply #5 Top

The only think behind them and above them is their asses
End of quote

Yea, I think they use their belly button for a periscope.

Reply #6 Top

They havent won yet, its just one more battle under thier belt. We still got alot going for us.
End of quote

Bit by bit, item by item.  How many newspapers ran the Danish comics?  When was the last time you saw a cartoon slamming christianity (my answer: Last week).

It is not an invasion and subjugation like in 39 Poland.  It is simply paying protection money to the terrorists.  And the "money" is our freedoms.  Ben Franklin was surely right.

Reply #7 Top

Yes but there are still alot of folks who want to fight them, and the left who are trying to commit cultural suicide.

Though I do understand the frustration with seeing christian bashing cartoons and not muslim ones.  I have voice such concerns as well.

Reply #8 Top

Yes but there are still alot of folks who want to fight them
End of quote

Oh, I dont think everyone has surrendered.  But too many have.  You cant effectively fight a war if half your population has no heart or stomach for it.

Reply #9 Top

Quoting Dr, reply 8
Oh, I dont think everyone has surrendered.  But too many have.  You cant effectively fight a war if half your population has no heart or stomach for it.
End of Dr's quote

Tell that to our founding fathers! A very large percentage of our country during the revolution did not particapate. about one third of the poulation didnt care about it, and I m talking free men here. not even a majority of the people actively supported the cause either.

Reply #10 Top

Tell that to our founding fathers!
End of quote

And another portion were Tories.  But the ones that did not care, did not undermine those who did.  It is one thing to not care.  It is another to actively seek the defeat of your own side because you fear for your life.  This is clearly an indication of the latter.

Reply #11 Top

Sorry a bit out of touch due to my current situation, what book have they pulled?

Reply #12 Top

Sorry a bit out of touch due to my current situation, what book have they pulled?
End of quote

The Jewel of Medina - by SHirley Jones

Reply #13 Top

No, its the action of people that dont want any trouble, which makes em on the sideline.

Reply #14 Top

No, its the action of people that dont want any trouble, which makes em on the sideline.
End of quote

By actively accepting the will of terrorists, they are not sitting on the sideline.  They have capitulated and become the Vichy of America.

Reply #15 Top

So then, the third of the US that didnt take sides during the Revolution when ever they just did as the British tell to did as well.... and that was often.

Reply #16 Top

So then, the third of the US that didnt take sides during the Revolution when ever they just did as the British tell to did as well.... and that was often.
End of quote

I would not totally equate them with the current crop, as it was a revolution.  They were cooperating with the authority that had ruled since its inception.  But their complicity hampered the american patriots (or as the English would say - the illegals).  The major difference is that today, it is not a revolution, but a conquest. 

Reply #17 Top

Today they are agreeing with the rulers who tell them that everyone should be able to get along, and trying to do their part. Is it stupid... yes, but its not total capitulation.  Its just holding to a bad philosophy.

Today we have the cult of the stranger, which says its those close to us that are dangerous, and outsiders should be revered.  This cult has been coming in for a long time, longer then Woodrow Wilson solidified it

Reply #18 Top

Today they are agreeing with the rulers who tell them that everyone should be able to get along, and trying to do their part. Is it stupid... yes, but its not total capitulation. Its just holding to a bad philosophy.
End of quote

it is when those "rulers" are taking orders from a foreigner.  Whether it is a nation or a person.  No one will claim that Vichy was anything but a puppet of an external influence.  This is the same thing.

It is beyond stupid.  But then saying they will live to regret their decision is a hopeful statement.  They will probably not live under their new rulers.