Anthony R Anthony R

Palin Hacker/Lamer Revealed!

Palin Hacker/Lamer Revealed!

Gateway Pundit has revealed all the details. The name of the Sarah Palin E-mail hacker/lamer is David Kernell, and he is (not surprisingly), the son of a Tennessee Dem State Rep.

1,172,359 views 599 replies
Reply #76 Top

The truth hurts: We have been profligate in our spending, inadequate in our saving and greedy in our investing. A RADICAL overhaul is needed:
End of quote

Agreed.   I assume that that is Bush's fault as well?  I am not as willing to assume that 50% of the country are just morons who all got fooled by Bush into acting as you describe.  If that is the case that he has got to be incredibly brilliant and powerful. The radical overhaul needs to be with each of us individually and stop blaming BUsh for everything in the world that went astray as we watched.

 

Reply #77 Top

Still can't edit, sorry.

Reply #78 Top

 4 years with McCain after 8 years with bush. We wood be Doomed for sure.

Life is so much better right now with Bush.;P

You just need to ask yourself. Are you living a good life with no worries? Are thing really as good as They say?

I know that we are in one of the worst times. If you don't believe me just watch the news. Or better yet fill up your gas tank.;P

 

Reply #79 Top

Quoting Snidely, reply 22
i truly feel sorry for anyone who votes for McCain/Palin. this country is in dire need of a new direction in leadership and McCain/Palin will not provide it. McCain is trying to say he is a candidate of change but he has voted in line with Bush over 90% of the time and he has admitted to it.

3 years ago, i was telling everyone i was hoping McCain would run. i was actually a fan of his and probably would've voted for him dependent on who the other candidate would be. but McCain has aligned himself with the religious right and his "straight talk" and truthfullness has taken a dive. 3 years ago, he stated the leaders of the relgious right should not have any influence in politics. why is he such a fan of theirs now? he'd rather lose his integrity than lose an election, i guess.

Obama is a racist or so at least somebody in this thread says. i highly doubt that. the man's mother is white! remember, whoever said he is a racist, racism goes both ways and you ARE guilty of it by making your comment.

Palin can see Russia from her window and that makes her an expert in foreign policy? and don't say Obama isn't, either. Obama has NEVER made claim to being an expert. don't say McCain is! he didn't even know Spain isn't in Latin AMerica the other day.

you know, it's quite humorous that all Wassila town council meeting minutes are now removed from the town's site. I was reading them 2 weeks ago. i wonder what national election campaign had them removed.

i also wonder why Palin doesn't want her husband or staff to be questioned regarding Troopergate. if they have nothing to hide, answer the question!

in case you're wondering, i am a registered democrat but i vote for the individual, not the party. if a republican or independent is the better person, i vote for him/her. i started voting in 1976, have never missed an election (local, state, or national), and have NEVER voted a straight ticket. if i thought Mc/Cain/Palin was better for the country, i'd vote for them. they aren't, tho. just because McCain was a POW doesn't mean he's a better candidate. i'm tired of that logic. years ago, i worked with a man who was a POW for for years in a German camp in WWII. he had physical disabilities the rest of his life due to the torture he received in that camp. Jack was the nicest man i've ever met and i miss him a great deal but i'd never consider voting for him for the office of President of The United States.

and when it comes to earmarks, when did obama ever say he hadn't asked for any? not once has he claimed to not asked for any. in my mind, it's every elected official's responsibility to get as much aid from the federal government to make things in their respective town, city, or state better. don't claim to have never asked for any or a disdain for the process when you've been a supporter of the process since the first day you were elected, though! "Thanks, but no thanks" my ass! the woman wanted the bridge built while she was running for governor. she can deny it all she wants but it's public record unless the McCain campaign has all the records removed and the videos removed from YouTube.

here's something that i find interesting:

Let's look at the educational background of your two options:

Obama:
Occidental College - Two years.
Columbia University - B.A. political science with a specialization in international relations.
Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude

& Biden:
University of Delaware - B.A. in history and B.A. in political science.
Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)

vs.

McCain:
United States Naval Academy - Class rank 894 of 899

& Palin:
Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semester
North Idaho College - 2 semesters - general study
University of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalism
Matanuska-Susitna College - 1 semester
University of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in journalism



 

 
End of Snidely's quote

Based on that last part, I take it you're saying that only a person with a top-level university degree is allowed to be president? Based on that criteria, it should be easy to setup a database of every living american, filter out everyone except those with outstanding university educations and then present your list of possible candidates for president based on those results?

How about military service for your country?  Wouldn't that credential apply? McCain served and almost died for his country and he knew that when he entered the service.  How many candidates have willingly entered military service and served their country knowing that they could possibly die during that term of service?  That seems like a pretty decent consideration to take into account. 

I'm not bashing education or even outstanding educational credentials as those that were listed, let's just make it clear that isn't the only criteria or probably not the most important set of criteria to consider when electing someone as the president.

Reply #80 Top

Quoting WeatherBound, reply 5
 4 years with McCain after 8 years with bush. We wood be Doomed for sure.

Life is so much better right now with Bush.

You just need to ask yourself. Are you living a good life with no worries? Are thing really as good as They say?

I know that we are in one of the worst times. If you don't believe me just watch the news. Or better yet fill up your gas tank.

 
End of WeatherBound's quote

- maybe you should reconsider your statement, look at those that are unfortunate to have been born in countries without access to food, water, health care, etc. 

Things can always be much worse than they are, be thankful for the things you have and focus on those things first before lamenting on the negative.

Reply #81 Top

Are thing really as good as They say?
End of quote
Yes.  Things are better than they have been (over the long term).  I think that we are seeing a market adjustment that should have been expected.

http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI%20INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC%20INDEXSP:.INX

 

Are you living a good life with no worries?
End of quote
I had worries before and during Bush's tenure.  But those are not his problems, those are mine.  Is my life good?  Yes.  Again, due to my choices of not to use credit and to have a fixed mortgage and to spend less than I make.  I work at a job I like making them a fair amout of money and reaping the benefits of that with a fair wage.
Or better yet fill up your gas tank.
End of quote
I'd look more towards  the car and oil companiies before I looked at the president.  What's he supposed to do?  Go back to his lab and invent something?  Or go to congress and force them to make laws to force us to do something?  That's crazy talk.  You want to save money on gas?  Walk, ride, carpool, bus.  Don't vote for Obama and expect gas prices to drop.  And if they do through some "tax break" or "refund" know that other people that worked hard supplied that money . . or it's being stolen from a future taxpayer.

Reply #82 Top

- maybe you should reconsider your statement, look at those that are unfortunate to have been born in countries without access to food, water, health care, etc.
End of quote

 

But I am talking about those who have  been around for  at least the last 8 years in the states.

Other countries will alays have there problems too.

 

Reply #83 Top

Gateway Pundit has revealed all the details. The name of the Sarah Palin E-mail hacker/lamer is David Kernell, and he is (not surprisingly), the son of a Tennessee Dem State Rep.
End of quote

More important, the question that should be asked is...

- Is he a PC or a MAC?

Inquiring minds want to know! XD

(anyone else love these new emoticons? - man, they're awesome!)

 

Reply #84 Top

Quoting WeatherBound, reply 9

- maybe you should reconsider your statement, look at those that are unfortunate to have been born in countries without access to food, water, health care, etc.


 

But I am talking about those who have  been around for  at least the last 8 years in the states.

Other countries will alays have there problems too.

 
End of WeatherBound's quote

Your statement & reply back are fair enough to be sure, what I was trying to say is that when you compare north american life to those human beings living in countries where access to food, water, access to medical assistance is very limited, etc.  Life on this side of the pond is that bad comparatively speaking.  

Just thought I would say that (and yes I'm probably being a smarta$$ in the process, sorry about that)

 

Reply #85 Top

meant to say ISN'T that bad, not IS that bad

- I suddenly can't edit posts in the forum, another wc site issue?

Reply #86 Top

Having said all.  and whatever Happens with the election.

<3  I Am Proud  to Be American! <3

 

 

Reply #87 Top

I had worries before and during Bush's tenure.  But those are not his problems, those are mine.  Is my life good?  Yes.  Again, due to my choices of not to use credit and to have a fixed mortgage and to spend less than I make.  I work at a job I like making them a fair amout of money and reaping the benefits of that with a fair wage.
End of quote

k1  

Reply #88 Top

I strongly disagree that the govenment should be involved in the investment community's failures. Tell where that's in the constitution. And no, it's not part of regulating trade.
End of quote

Where did I say they should be? They have the responsibility to regulate interstate trade and that's just the way the division of powers says it. If you don't like the idea of the Feds regulating trade, amend the Constitution, Zu.

We're gonna end up on welfare because our jobs will disappear thanks to the current administration's lack of doing the oversight it should have been doing. Allowing the market to be "free" (Bushese for not doing your job and letting your cronies profit from it) invited the current collapse. That's just fact. I don't like it, but it's the truth.

Would the Dems be better? I don't know. The Republicans did screw the pooch royally, though, and if you can't see that what's the point of arguing it farther?

Your last sentence is a non sequiter, but I certainly agree with the sentiment.

Reply #89 Top

I strongly disagree that the govenment should be involved in the investment community's failures. Tell where that's in the constitution. And no, it's not part of regulating trade.
End of quote
Where did I say they should be? They have the responsibility to regulate interstate trade and that's just the way the division of powers says it. If you don't like the idea of the Feds regulating trade, amend the Constitution, Zu
End of quote
We're gonna end up on welfare because our jobs will disappear thanks to the current administration's lack of doing the oversight it should have been doing. Allowing the market to be "free" (Bushese for not doing your job and letting your cronies profit from it) invited the current collapse. That's just fact. I don't like it, but it's the truth.
End of quote
Depending on how you interpret the commerce clause of the constitution the feds do have the right to meddle in intrastate trade (intrastate meaning our states and other nation-states) . . so I'll stand corrected (even if I do not like it ;)).

Having said that though .  . the commerce clause puts the power in not the exuctive branch but in the legistlative one.  So where does that put us?  Still the president's fault?  Still his responsability?

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3:

"The Congress shall have power . . . .to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"

Reply #90 Top

Island Dog, nowhere have I said Obama will "wave his wand". Our standing in the world matters a great deal and you know it! All I'm saying is this country can not afford another 4 years of the current policies. Tell me something McCain will change. If he states he'll change anything, that would go against his actions the last 5 yearsI was a McCain supporter for years. Like I said, until 5 years ago, I agreed with most of his beliefs. Not now. He's aligned himself with the religious right and I totally disagree with that.

i won't be replying anymore in the thread. i have my strong beliefs, you have yours. the  thing is i'm right and you're wrong ;)

Reply #91 Top

Quoting Snidely, reply 17
Island Dog, nowhere have I said Obama will "wave his wand". Our standing in the world matters a great deal and you know it! All I'm saying is this country can not afford another 4 years of the current policies. Tell me something McCain will change. If he states he'll change anything, that would go against his actions the last 5 yearsI was a McCain supporter for years. Like I said, until 5 years ago, I agreed with most of his beliefs. Not now. He's aligned himself with the religious right and I totally disagree with that.

i won't be replying anymore in the thread. i have my strong beliefs, you have yours. the  thing is i'm right and you're wrong
End of Snidely's quote

well that cleared it up for me....

OUCH!

Hope that was a friendly winky! ;-)

(mine is)

 

Reply #92 Top

the thing is i'm right and you're wrong
End of quote
Looks like we all suffer from the same problem........

Reply #93 Top

Looks like we all suffer from the same problem........
End of quote

Indeed.

 

Reply #94 Top

when did carter become part of this? if carter is involved, let's get nixon in here too. you want 4 more years of nixon?
End of quote

The same way Bush has anything to do with this election, but since the Democrats are stuck in "run against Bush" mode, they havan't noticed he's not on the ballot in any state.

Reply #95 Top

the commerce clause puts the power in not the exuctive branch but in the legistlative one. So where does that put us? Still the president's fault? Still his responsability?

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3:

"The Congress shall have power . . . .to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"
End of quote

The Congress is responsible through the SEC, DOJ, FTC etc. The guys who run the agencies are appointed by the Executive Branch...ie the Attorney General (appointed by Executive and confirmed and voted on by the Senate...ie Gonzalez!) Gonna blame that on Bush? YUP!

Reply #96 Top

Quoting Island, reply 5

i truly feel sorry for anyone who votes for McCain/Palin. this country is in dire need of a new direction in leadership and McCain/Palin will not provide it. McCain is trying to say he is a candidate of change but he has voted in line with Bush over 90% of the time and he has admitted to it.


I'm going to scream if I hear "change" any more.  It's a marketing tactic, nothing else.  What exactly did McCain vote with Bush, why it is necessarily bad if true?  I see nobody has answered my question, what has Obama accomplished aside from running a good marketing ploy?

I'd rather have 4 more years of Bush, than another 4 of Carter. 

 


Obama has NEVER made claim to being an expert.


Well maybe somebody forgot to put it in his teleprompter.  He certainly can't claim to be an expert at much, because he hasn't done anything to be an expert.  Palin running a small town is still more experience and leadership than Obama can ever claim.
End of Island's quote

The only person that I can think of that would be crazy enough to vote mccain/palin is someone who has their pockets lined by the oil industry. This country's economy is crumbling all around us under the bush presidency and you expect us to want more of that. We might as well just crawl into a hole and die if that is the case. If there is 4 more years of bush, this country is so screwed! :(

Reply #97 Top

The only person that I can think of that would be crazy enough to vote mccain/palin is someone who has their pockets lined by the oil industry. This country's economy is crumbling all around us under the bush presidency and you expect us to want more of that. We might as well just crawl into a hole and die if that is the case. If there is 4 more years of bush, this country is so screwed!
End of quote

You said it!

Amen

Reply #98 Top

You seem to live in a world where Bush is responsible for everything and congress responsible for nothing even when the Dems are in control of same. Please note that Bush put forth a bill in 2003 to redo Fan and Freddy as they seemed to be heading out of control and congress said no because they wanted to be sure that lower income groups could get mortgages. I happen to not be a Bush fan, but the only group with lower approval ratings is congress and believe it or not, they write the laws and are responsible for oversight.
End of quote

I've been reading this post and I've seen alot of commenting about how the president is responsible for all our troubles.....ONE MAN does not run this country! ONE MAN cannot be responsibe for every problem we face. ONE MAN cannot be the solution to all our problems.

Sure, whoever does become president will have an impact, but it's CONGRESS we need to clean!

Reply #99 Top

I find it hard to believe how many/ most americans buy into the propaganda :ninja: spewed out by both parties trying do get the "power".;P

It's a giant puppetshow and has been for years or even decades. O:) I believe that the government has been a unified effort to do whatever they want}:) , while in the meantime as the people are left arguing politics and pushing blame around.:moo:     All the while, mesmerised by the shining lights and mood music of the show.:O

Now of course, what you have just read MAY not bee 100% accurate.  Even though,I am sure there is much slight of hand being played on the masses.*_* :pout:

 

Reply #100 Top

Xiandi for Prez '08.  You seem to know what most (even the pathetic excuse for "the media") fail to undrstand.  Thanks for being one of the most realistic posts on the subject.