GeneralEtrius GeneralEtrius

You're Banned!: The Forum Game

▼

You're Banned!: The Forum Game

from GalCiv2 Forums

Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?

off-topic
6,548,821 views 41,551 replies +16 Loading…
Reply #37276 from Sins Forums Top

banned for going with the GalCivII movement

The Political Machine 2024
Reply #37278 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for being atrociously repetitive...

Reply #37279 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for being atrociously repetitive...

Reply #37281 from Sins Forums Top

banned for not liking the big eye

Reply #37282 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Quoting Draakjacht, reply 37274
The funny thing about saying someone is in the closet is that's impossible to disprove, as it is a matter of belief until the person comes out, that being the only point of possible validation.
End of Draakjacht's quote

Banned because you can prove someone's in the closet if they are sneaking out for sex and you catch them in a hotel tryst, hiring a prostitute, or displaying 'a wide stance' in a public bathroom.

I suppose you might eventually be able to disprove a closet-case accusation with the right application of brain-scanning tools, except that even that sort of research depends on assumptions that all folks react similarly to images of the kind of sex they most enjoy. 

Reply #37283 from Sins Forums Top

banned for continuing the subject

Reply #37284 from Sins Forums Top

Quoting GW, reply 37284
Banned because you can prove someone's in the closet if they are sneaking out for sex and you catch them in a hotel tryst, hiring a prostitute, or displaying 'a wide stance' in a public bathroom.
End of GW's quote

banned because that's pretty much the coming out of the closet I mentioned.

Quoting GW, reply 37284
I suppose you might eventually be able to disprove a closet-case accusation with the right application of brain-scanning tools, except that even that sort of research depends on assumptions that all folks react similarly to images of the kind of sex they most enjoy.
End of GW's quote

Yeah, I'm not sure if we're at a point where we have a really accurate measure of all that. Would be cool though.

Reply #37285 from Sins Forums Top

banned for quoting

Reply #37286 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for equating quoting with banishment.

Reply #37287 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for individuality. 

Individuality Demotivator

 

The Admiral

Reply #37288 from Sins Forums Top

banned for everyone is special... which is like not being special at all.

Reply #37289 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for stating what the picture implied.

 

The Admiral

Reply #37290 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for now I feel sad. <X3

Reply #37291 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for the worst has yet to come.

Destiny Demotivator

 

The Admiral

Reply #37292 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for what is that?

Reply #37293 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned because it is a rose. What did you think it was???? *_*

Reply #37294 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for inquisitiveness.

 

The Admiral

 

Reply #37295 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for my first thought was a rose, but I was making sure, as I've not seen a rose plant in awhile.

I have seen a rose, though. And its pretty. Like a flower, only spread open, and warm and inviting.

Reply #37296 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for taking it to far.

 

The Admiral

Reply #37297 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for crossing the line.

Reply #37298 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned for not having enough contact with plants. Humans need them to survive, no matter what Tyson and McDonald's want you to think.

Reply #37299 from Sins Forums Top

Banned for conspiracies.

 

The Admiral

Reply #37300 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Banned to silence you.