No.

You have to find a beach. Then you have to build a city. Then you have to build a harbor. Then you build a ship. Then you have to load units onto the ship. Then you have to find another beach to unload the units.

That's a lot of work.

In Civ V, units just walk across the water (they turn into boats at the water's edge).

It's a lot of work but has a huge pay off: being able avoid entire kingdoms or wilds of enemies.

Turning units into boats once they touch water is ok if you want to make a casual game. Please don't take the easy way out.

edit: though I do agree having to build an entire city next to water is rather ridiculous. Perhaps allow for pioneers to construct small harbors? City harbors could offer x2 build speed or something to give players an incentive to also make a coastal city if they wish.

For shits and giggles I tried introducing a mod mechanic that would give the AI comparable levels of metal to that of their materials. The AI still produced lower quality gear, even when higher quality was available.

So I assumed a theory that the AI would always produce units when it could, with the highest quality. This would lead to it perpetually being out of one resource, as there would always be a limiter. But this was not so. Even when I made sure the AI had over 20 000 metal and materials, and 100k+ gildar, it still continued building units with leather armor instead of master heavy plate, which I know it had access to. Indeed, not even with such abundant resources did the AI ever construct any other unit with more than one warrior (squad/group/party/raid), except diplomacy units.

There seem to be a disconnect here between what the AI can do and what it does do. Even when in a position to be able to construct the right units, it continues to produce the wrong units. I am oversimplifying, of course.

The AI, it seems, need to be able to "save" resources until a suitable unit can be produced, especially middle or late game. The AI badly needs to avoid wasting resources on poor unit management (single units with only a weapon and leather gear).

Furthermore, not once have I seen AI make use of training units with higher quality. This is also a huge waste on behalf of the AI, as it is one of the best ways to save resources.

I've seen companies of doom hammer, plate mailed units plenty of times.

Did they have the tech to use that stuff?  Had they built the prereq buildings?

Yeah, I made sure they had the tech. I see the enemy use strong weapons, but they are always limiting themselves to the weaker versions of armor.

Edit: The building, yes. Well, if they didn't, they should have.

Edit2: So as to not sound all negative, I've also noticed two awesome things the AI does - it uses Death Ward to protect significant assets - and it seeds new towns with pioneers next to free resources. That last bit is actually quite excellent, a strategy I'll have to adopt.

Example: Turn 355. AI Relias has conquered the map. He has trained some master heavy plate units, so there is no question he has the tech. His resources are 46k materials, 106k metal, 1.7mil gildar. About half the cities have built a command post. There are NO units with more than one warrior on the map. Also, no AI-designed unit is wearing a helmet.

Edit: 90% of the units trained are wearing light plate armor. I'd say another 9% are diplomacy units, and the remaining 1% are the well-designed (solo) units.

You only want the Ai to build companies until it does.                                 

Hah. No, I really am concerned that the AI needs x8 times the health in order for me to face difficulties fighting it (twice that of ridiculous).

I have always wanted to ask a dev the following questions when a game is released but does not play like it is finished which happens most of the time these days unfortunatly. Now please don't take offense at these questions. I love Gal Civ games. And I can see the potential in this game.

1. How did you come to the conclusion that the game was finished?

Keep in mind that a LOT of people had the same conclusion when playing the game at launch that it felt and looked unfinished/unpolished. Of coarse you not going to stop all bugs and such but this was not the main prolmes with the game. Many of the game mechanics were not finished or they did not play like they were finished.  Basically the game did look and play like it was rushed out the door to a lot of people playing the game at launch.

2. In Beta you had said several times that you had some build that you weren't showing us that would take care of a lot of issues on Launch day. However this was not the case. What happened?

I'm one of those that support Stardock but think the game was not finished upon launch. To this day it still plays like a beta but it is 10 times better now than it was at launch. And by March it should be the game it was suppose to be at launch.  this is not a FLAME so please don't be offended there is no need to take offense.

I have stayed away from this game for the most part, checking it from time to time to see if it has improved to the point where I will have fun playing it.  Been playing CIV V and Age of Wonders: SM in the mean time.

I just played a great game where I limited myself in the following ways:

1) I didn't build any unit with more than one soldier in it

and

2) I didn't train any unit with a higher quality level than the default.

And suddenly the AI was extremely hard to fight against (in fact I lost). I would consider this "proof" that the AI is capable of so much more, but is simply limited in how it is built.

I've been having fun.  Quite anxious for extra time with it in the holidays! 

Its great that you support Elemental after the release and your customer support is great, too, but if you look at the low reviews and at other games in the genre you should have seen what Elemental is missing:

- Many different spells which are useful and balanced (Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic)

- Tactical battles with cover and city walls (Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic)

- Many different special abilities (Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic)

- Ability to upgrade units (Civilization V)

- Experience for units with different abilities (Civilization V)

Asks nicely for all the above before we get into expansion territory, pleeeaaaase

Perhaps it would be a solution to remove groups as the 6th stat and instead of increasing the stats units could get abilities as in Civilization V.

I get what your saying and agree but you have already put out an outstanding game that even rivals and surpasses the best game in it's genra Masters of Orion 2 and that is Galciv2.

I got a little bored waiting for 1.1 last night so I decided to sneak into Stardock HQ and I found the following pictures of Stardock's new employees. You may recognize them due to their effect on the industry.

Project Manager

Python/mod God

"I'm so glad Stardock has such great post-release support."

Huh!?  Stardock has released Elemental in early Beta form, in case this has eluded everyone.  They've been using sales of this unfinished product to complete their game.

The state of graphics alone looks like concept drawings rather than a finished concept.

...in your opinion.

I do see it differently... , in fact, I can't think of another game where the developers, and CEO for that matter, join-in on the forum discussions, taking in comments/suggestions/feedback, giving us UPDATES on their progress, informing US of the PROCESS, etc., -- and not to mention the occasional left-left-right-upper-cut combo that, frequently, get sent towards them.

One other Stardock game I have is GalCiv I, so I visit the GalCiv forum regularly.  And even now, in fact a couple days ago, I saw in the forums a developer giving live troubleshooting advice to someone who had just recently purchased GalCiv II -- which has been out for years.  That is a perfect and real example of post-release support.  Further, Stardock has announced a visit to GalCiv II for an update.

So I guess before I went into all that, I should have just asked:  "Which planet are you from?"