which programs featured here by stardock is the most stable???

Apprently, most of the skinnable programs here are doing more or less the same purpose..the only thing is that most that i have tried are very unstable and crashes your system most of the time...i would like to know if any of the programs featured here is the most stable..thanks
5,184 views 17 replies
Reply #1 Top
Most of the programs have nothing to do with each other actually.
Reply #2 Top
i don't understand but what i was asking is of the programs featured here like desktopX nextstart or winblinds ..which one here in your opinion here is the most stable?
Reply #3 Top
Hmmm, that's somewhat of a loaded question. IMO, stability is more often than not a combination of the OS you're running and the quality of your video drivers.

Skinnable apps tend to stress the OS in general and the OS's video capabilities in particular.

For instance, I use a W2K laptop with an ATI video card and drivers. While W2K is stable, my ATI drivers are terrible. I can't run any skinnable apps in 32 bit color mode without getting graphic corruption and (I suspect) GDI resource leaks.

In my experience, at first it's easy to blame a particular skinnable app, but it shortly becomes apparent that its the OS and drivers that are to blame as I start to have problems with all graphic-intensive apps.

Lastly, if considering comparing the functionality of each app, then you're sort of comparing apples and oranges with regard to WindowBlinds,NextStart,and DesktopX in that on the surface, yeah they're skinnable apps but each serves a different purpose. WindowBlinds skins the standard Windows and Windows Apps. DesktopX is a "freemform" object-based desktop enhancement.
NextStart (and Workshelf) is a configurable popup menu system/program launcher.

As I said, at various times I've run all three in some combination or other. The problems I have are not with the apps but with my laptop. On my desktop computer with an entirely different video card/driver, I have no such problems.

I would consider trying all three apps you've mentioned and see how they behave on your computer. You may want to verify that your video drivers are current. If you're running a Win9X/Me OS you may want to consider upgrading to Win2K as its more stable OS with better memory/resource management.

Just my two cents.
Reply #4 Top
Well said Chris!
Reply #5 Top
Hmm. Funky red text including my name when I posted. Hmmm. Very strange.
Reply #9 Top
When I posted my response, the browser hung as if the scripting.wincustomize.com server was not responding or timing out. I killed the browser session so I wasn't even sure my post made it to the server. Maybe the wincustomize site is experiencing heavy load?
Reply #10 Top
javabrain I think you have to put some text after the /me

but maybe /me is wrong?
Reply #11 Top
hey,
/me that's pretty cool
Reply #12 Top
er ...well sort of *grin*
Reply #13 Top
hey thanks chris for the information..Well, i've tried nextstart and Desktopx together..nextstep works pretty okie but unfortunately, my desktopx keeps crashing my system.ironically, i was so impressed with desktop x intially that i purchased it.( i stii like it but so unstable on my system ) , from what you told me the problems lies with the system and not the program but i've tried installing it into my desktop computer but still the same unstablity ,nextstart works fine most of the time...oh yeah, could the problem be because i'm using ATI drivers with 8MB display ram for my laptop? ( chris did mention that he was using ATI drivers on his laptop right and it didn't work well..) oh by the way, i'm runnning win98 and display drivers are current..
Reply #14 Top
Did you try different themes?
Some themes can be quite heavy and really slow down your computer, to the point possibly of crashing it. Also some themes use third party plug-ins (or modules) such as a clock, Winamp controls, etc. You may have a theme with a buggy module.
In short: make sure you have the latest video drivers and patches for OS. Try different themes. If you don't have a lot of RAM and CPU, stick to more simple and small themes.
Reply #15 Top
Airwalker, I'm using a compaq laptop running w2k with 8 Meg ATI mobile (m3 Church) video card. I can't run wblinds,nextstart,desktopx,object bar in 32 bit (True) color.

IIRC:

With wblinds I start getting black menus, then lose window title bars.

With NextStart I usually get a subscript out of range error dialog box and /or a can't auto repaint/draw image error dialog box. Or I get black menus instead of skinned menus in NexStart.

Oddly enough, DesktopX has been pretty stable for me in 16 bit (High) color mode.

The corruption usually happens anywhere from within 5 minutes to a couple of hours.

If I catch the corruption quickly and close some apps, the corruption temporarily goes away.

Running at 16 bit (High) color is much better. I almost never get the problem. (Problem is, a lot of wallpapers and NextStart themes look terrible at 16 bit (High) color so I have to tweak them with PSP).

What also make the problem occur more is if I switch between a lot wb skins and nextstart skins.

As I said, I really can't blame windowblinds or nextstart for this. If you haven't done so already try switching to 16 bit (High) color and see if you have any better luck.
Reply #16 Top
hey chris i'm also using a compaq laptop! with a 8mb ATi rage pro on a win98 almost the same configs as you..but i run in 32-bit true color and not 16 bit...nextstart works for me hmmm i don't really want to consider 16 bit...like you said, lots of themes looks horrible in that mode..strangely, i run nextstep pretty ok but not desktopX even in 16 bit could be what paxx said..i could be running buggy themes ...well, thanks guys i guess i'll try looking for a nice stable theme and give desktop another shot.