Yes I agree that Mein Kampf is a communist manifesto, Buchanan has studied this manual regularly for the purposes of future application. Buchanan derailed his campaign when he started babbling New World Order type stuff, he started blasting everything and anything international, he is so extreme right, even the Fox news channel stopped airing the Kook.
Buchanan rallied blue collar workers against the evils of the World Trade Organization. The only problem I developed personally about the world Trade Organization came when Clinton signed on China. Sure we get cheap goods made by slaves, but is it a good policy to send our consumer money to communist China? China is a slavery market, China turns it's military on it's own people, not a model for a world business partner, and it upsets a balance of competition. China is difficult to compete against because of the slavery in their production. I use my own personal choice as a consumer when I refuse to purchase all Chinese products.
Buchanan’s policy for national security is not feasible; the proactive approach is the only sensible choice. Sending our military and reconstructive efforts to the heart of the problem is the only option, not sitting at home waiting for attack and hoping to defend against it.

Anthony you're wrong about Buchanan, big time wrong.

"I use my own personal choice as a consumer when I refuse to purchase all Chinese products."

Anthony R, I agree with you about China and the slave market and I respect your decision to ban Chinese products. How are you able to stick too it? Almost everything I look at has the "Made in China" sticker.

I bought Chinese products by accident before. I have commie wearever cookware and a commie chair. China is everywhere in the store thanks to Bubba.

They're not demanding he go to jail for his addiction; they're demanding he go to jail for the illegal activity he committed due to his addiction. There's a difference. You've skewed the argument here.

To answer your question: Limbaugh is a bigger hypocrit. Why? Because he ran his mouth, and condemned others WHILE he himself was suffering his own addiction. The Right is VERY good at that though--preachin' while committing the same sins they preach against.

"That is why I have sympathy for Rush who was driven by pain too addiction and not for Downy who was driven too addiction by hedonism."

Give me a break! If you want to argue that point, then we could argue that maybe those people who are addicted to recreational drugs have psychological issues (which is a medical condition covered by 99.9% of the medical plans in the US). Let's take it one step further and compare drug addiction to alcoholism--any form of drug addiction. Alcoholism is often called a disease, is it not? Why would a perfectly happy person experiment with recreational drugs, knowing what we know about their effects? And why would a perfectly happy person continue to use recreational drugs although he has been ordered by the court not to and has been punished for that use repeatedly? Mental issues, perhaps? Reminder: Poor mental health is a medical condition.

The point: Limbaugh is a hypocrit and deserves no more pity than he wanted to give those he condemned for YEARS. Perhaps this is the lesson he was meant to learn? Let God be the only one to judge.

"republican voters like me and apparently Tech take it seriously when we vote"

Now that's just plain . . . I can't believe you've suggested that anyone who is NOT Republican does not take their voting seriously.
I'm a liberal, Black, EDUCATED lesbian and I didn't vote for Bush (or his Daddy). I wouldn't vote for any of the Democrats who are looking to run for President either. Republicans and Democrats, at this point, are one in the same--talkin' out the side of their mouths and accomplishing zilch.

I have nothing against blacks or lesbians but liberals with inquisitive Alan Colmes eyebrows annoy me till no end.
You claim to be a liberal, are you sure? Do you suffer from the following delusions...?

John Ashcroft poses a greater danger to America than Osama bin Laden, Hussein or Jong Il.

Bush is not intelligent enough to be president but you consider the Dixie Chicks, Martin Sheen, Al Qaida Franken, Barbara Streisand, Tim Robbins, and Jeanine Garofalo qualified to dictate foreign policy.

Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Il, and Yasser Arafat were fairly and democratically elected, but President Bush was not.

Welfare is a fundamental human right, but workfare is a human rights violation.

If you answered yes to any of these things then you are a liberal.

Rush for stating repeatedly that we have "NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY" . . . that this is an inferred right by liberal (he likes to pronounce it "librawl") judges. And now he wants to sing the blues about his right to prvacy being violated. Which is it, Fat Bastard?