kona0197 kona0197

Ironic - don't you think?

Ironic - don't you think?

Our next US Aircraft Carrier is going to be named "USS George H W Bush"

http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/ships/carriers/bush/naming.txt
16,423 views 91 replies
Reply #76 Top
just fire up your built in messenger that windows comes with brother.
Reply #77 Top
um its not there anymore. I killed it.

Let me see if I can find it.
Reply #78 Top
i did kill it, oops. my xp install cds are in a different city than I am in right now. Also I wouldn't be very good company...I've been up for over 36 hours and am about to go to bed.

I'll get one of those programs tomorrow and send you a message, be patient and the crazy one shall arrive.
Reply #79 Top
cool thanks. get ICQ lite. I love it.
Reply #80 Top
alright. will do.
Reply #81 Top
@ AllOfYou Geez Guys! Can't we all just get along!
Reply #82 Top
I thought Clinton was the only President that dreams of people (preferably female) getting on their knees in front of him.

Unlike GWB Jr who is very happy with ( TC??? A good candidate?) people bending over and touching their toes .....

As for naming of the USN fleet, the policy used to be (and this is from an old and murky memory!) along the lines of 'Capitol Ships' (Carriers) after Presidents or major Naval figures ie, 'Nimitz', 'JFK', 'Capitol Ships' (Battleships and Battlecruisers) named for States, ie 'New Jersey', 'Missouri', 'Arizona' etc, 'Cruisers' (and I'm not sure of the distinction between heavy and light units) received the names of US cities, ie, 'Indianapolis' and 'Newport News' were heavy cruisers while 'Atalanta' and 'Juneau' were light AA cruisers.
Destroyers seem to have been given the names of significant or heroic figures in naval history,either as a category or as single units,ie, 'Cushing','Benson - Livemore' and the 'Fletcher' classes, 'Reuben James', and of course the 'USS Sullivans' as an example of naming a ship in memory of the group of 5(?)brothers who were all killed during the Guadalcanal campaign in a single action.
The sheer number of units built during WW2 seems to have shifted policy, many fleet carriers received the names of military engagements, ie, 'Coral Sea', 'Tarawa', 'Bunker Hill', and escort carriers were also named this way ... 'Casablanca' comes to mind, while certain cruisers were named to honour Allied vessels that were lost in action, the 'Canberra', after the RAN light cruiser lost off Guadalcanal, as well as USN casualties so honoured, ie the immortal 'Enterprise'.......and the 'Houston'.
No idea where the 'Kittyhawk' came from, being a carrier, and I (me, myself) think it became 'political' when the names of living presidents started to turn up on carriers.....be great to have had the name of the 'USS Richard M Nixon' (yes ... I KNOW he's deceased now!) on a nice new CVA around the Watergate period or the 'USS James Carter' during the Iran hostage 'rescue' debacle.
And then you have the 'USS Ronald Reagan' .... the 'USS Contragate'?
The thought of naming USN Vessels after Hollywood 'Actors' raises a few interesting titles .... the 'USS Rock Hudson' .... 'USS John Wayne'... 'USS Arnie' or even the 'USS Doris Day'??????
Better to go back to the original tradition or just give them all numbers.
As for the 'USS George Bush Senior', he certainly was one of the better CIA Directors and as for the 'Real' Gulf War ... the decisions in such a matter as pushing ahead to Baghdad, yes or no, are NOT made by the President alone ..... 'All The President's Men' make the policy. >




Powered by SkinBrowser!
[Message Edited]
Reply #83 Top
Kitty Hawk is where the Wright brothers first flew
Reply #84 Top


Reply #85 Top
Kitty Hawk is where the Wright brothers first flew

I know that Fuzzy ... 100 years ago just a few weeks past.
But I'm not sure how it fits the USN 'Naming of Ships of War' protocol.





Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #86 Top
the decisions in such a matter as pushing ahead to Baghdad, yes or no, are NOT made by the President alone ..... 'All The President's Men' make the policy. >


uh hu

Reply #87 Top
IP!!
If the 'President' had the final say in such matters wouldn't that make him a 'Dictator'!??
Shock! Horror!
Wombat attempts to disguise extreme cynicism .... promptly forgets the 'coloured text in post' routine!



Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #88 Top

wombat...I think KittyHawk was the site of an Indian battle....before some bicycle mechanics tried bumping hairy-planes over it...hence the military naming....as with the aircraft [Curtis]....and Yank tanks went the same way....Abrams, Stuart, Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, etc...

Say....why is it the Aussies gotta have the answers to Merrycan history?....

 

Reply #89 Top
I'll probably get flamed for saying this

Say....why is it the Aussies gotta have the answers to Merrycan history


I think it's because the American educational system does a piss-poor job teaching children US History and when they do teach it the literature is selected by liberals. When I was in grade school in Texas in the early '70's you were taught Texas History and US History. I didn't have another US History class until I was a junior in highschool in New Hampshire. Not even the middle school for military dependents I went to, when my father was stationed in Germany, taught US History.
Reply #90 Top
Say....why is it the Aussies gotta have the answers to Merrycan history

Enquiring minds .... ?
Non-membership of the "Flat Earth Society"?
0/28 SBS!

Re the Curtiss P40,the Poms (and the RAAF)named the A-B-C series 'Tomahawk' and the D series onward 'Kittyhawk'..... the earlier P36 was known as the 'Mohawk'.
Can't recall the USAAC names for the early aircraft other than Hawk 75 and 75A, but the P40D and the rest were known as 'Warhawks', except the ones in the Phillipines and the CBI theatre .... the 'Neverhawks'.




Powered by SkinBrowser!
Reply #91 Top
Sorry....'Curtiss'....Spell checker