#20 by DesignCaddy - 3/11/2004 3:42:12 PM 4) It doesn't work great
as a wallpaper, especially since the majority uses white icons and prefer
non-blinding bright wallpapers.
bad assumption, lass..if all
moderation were done based on what you felt the community wanted (or by what
download numbers showed, as that would have to be what you're basing on) you'd
be screwing the rest of the world out of having an alternative choice. 'n that
just 'aint fair. |
Don't really know how to react to "lass"...but that is a different topic.
Anyway. Re-read the post. Notice the "(in order)" ? Do you
notice where #4 is? Can we assume that it was the last reason why it was
rejected after the other ones already were a reason for it?
And, no, there is no "assumption" about it. The most downloaded
wallpapers are dark. Most people also use white icons and a resolution of
1024x768. Most people on this site also use XP. I don't
"assume". I go by statistics. Yes, there will be people who don't
fit that profile, but they won't fit in "most". And, I didn't say
that it wouldn't work as a wallpaper, I said that it wouldn't work "great" as a
wallpaper. Combined that with the 3 more annoying issues, and it got
rejected. Is that a bit clearer?