Scott Peterson trial…circumstantial evidence?

July 14, 2004 10:32 AM from

What are your thoughts about the prosecution being able to get a conviction based on circumstantial evidence?

For those interested, I found that Court TV’s Nancy Grace has been conducting a series of live interviews with some interesting people related to the case. Some people being interviewed for the shows are Juror #5, FBI agents, detectives, etc. This continues to air Wednesday and Thursday (July 14th – 15th) at 11pm each night.

864 views 5 replies

Reply #1 July 14, 2004 1:51 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

anyone willing to convict over circumstantial evidence is an idiot in my opinion for two reasons.

1. the possibility of jailing an innocent person.

2. the possibility of letting a killer(s) get away with such a crime.

Reply #2 July 14, 2004 3:18 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

I would be willing to bet that a group of 4 starving lawyers(if there exists such a thing) could conspire to create a murder case , using circumstantial evidence, against you!

Reply #3 July 17, 2004 2:16 AM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

yeah i think it could be done

Reply #4 July 17, 2004 10:15 AM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

oh hell, you can over throw the US political process with enough liars, connections, Lawyers and Judges.

of course anyone can get railroaded...

Reply #5 July 17, 2004 2:09 PM from

WinCustomize Forums Top

oh hell, you can over throw the US political process with enough liars, connections, Lawyers and Judges.

It works with only 2 of the 4.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!