Nem2k2: I totally agree. It is VERY biased.
I think we're talking past each other. Let me put it a different way:
Since the founding of WinCustomize.com the sections chosen on the site have been based on ones that are already popular in their own right. We have intentionally gone out of our way not to put up apps that are "up and coming" but rather ones that are already very popular.
The idea being that the software developers would then send WC a lot of traffic in which case some % of that traffic would end up buying subscriptions or purchasing SD software and such.
Rainlendar, for instance, had a hard time getting a section here because it wasn't popular enough independently. And because it was freewrae, a higher percentage of its users are likely to be in the "free beer" category of user (i.e. think that buying software is not "l33t").
The general rule of thumb is that a section on WinCustomize should not noticeably increase the popularity of an app. Sections on WC should reflect the established popularity of an app, not create it.
WC includes sections for apps that compete with Stardock apps for users. But the cold hearted calculus used on that is that while some users may decide to pick Litestep instead of ObjectBar or SysMetrix instead of DesktopX, the popularity of those programs will bring enough new users in to offset that risk. Right now, and I could be wrong, I think Samurize would eat up more DesktopX users than bring in new users who might buy WindowBlinds or Object Desktop or whatever.
I think Samurize is on the right path, and obviously we want it to succeed. I just think it needs to become more independently popular.
As a Stardockian, I want to help Samurize become independently popular because it will draw more users into the customization market and therefore potentially become an Object Desktop user (not to mention you guys are just great guys).
But as a WinCustomize admin whose conscious of the costs of this site, we can only let apps that are independently very popular on. If Samurize goes on, then why not AveDesk? If AveDesk, why not Kapsules? Then pretty soon we're the primary marketing and bandwidth hub for programs that take sales away from DesktopX potentially but don't bring in very many new users who might purchase stuff (look at some of hte people on Aqua-Soft.org. They think pay software is "the devil").
Sorry for be so long winded. Normally my role as Stardock guy and WinCustomize guy don't come into conflict. This is one of those times they do.