Message to Carielf (I can't reach you by e-mail)

I tried to reply to your e-mail but I got an undeliverable message.

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

[email protected]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO::
host mail2.stardock.com [134.215.215.77]: 550 , Recipient unknown

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path:
Received: from [10.10.11.19] (helo=e499.ccci.org)
by smtp.ccci.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1ABxwN-0005my-EQ
for [email protected]; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:56:55 -0400
Received: from HART-V002.net.ccci.org (Not Verified[10.10.60.20]) by harte499
id ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:59:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C397E3.EBD01A84"
Subject:
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:59:26 -0400
Message-ID:
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Index: AcOX48Ik1LqG1I69SpuqV2PFu9unqQ==
From: "Mario McDonald"
To:
Cc:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C397E3.EBD01A84
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yes I did. Could that be the problem? In my last games I have stopped =
doing that and my last 3 games went fine. Could the milking the AI be =
considered cheesy practice?
=20
Thank you very much for your response.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C397E3.EBD01A84
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable









Yes I did. Could that be the =
problem? In my=20
last games I have stopped doing that and my last 3 games went fine. =
Could the=20
milking the AI be considered cheesy practice?
 
Thank you very much for your=20
response.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C397E3.EBD01A84--
This e-mail is in regards to my zero score game.
96 views 0 replies