A lot of talk has gone on in the past few weeks on JU about the morality of homosexuality, but this is by far the least impressive, most simplistic comment on the topic we've seen yet. So I'm going to argue against you attempting to be as simplistic as you because it is probably all that your meagre brain can handle.
Seeing as the human species has a major overpopulation problem, having humans who choose not to breed is actually something that could help the continuation of the species. If we don't stop breeding, we're going to destroy our own habitat. So gays, homos, poofters, fags, sub-humans, as you would say, are in fact much better and moral than you are.
"No specie works contrary to it's own continuity."
This is one of the silliest, most contradictory statements of all time. If, as you say, homosexuality works against our continuity, then quite clearly there is a species that works against its own continuity, and they are called humans, and that is part of human nature. What's more plenty of animals kill other animals of the same species (humans included), which, according to your Grade 3 logic, would mean that almost all animals act contrary to their own continuation. Perhaps Mr God wants us to self-destruct as part of his grand plan. He did after all create a world that is going to blow up in a few billion years.
And then there's the Cathars ( a sect of Chrsitianity) who believed that procreation was sinful. And then there's all those married hetties who choose not to have children of all things. Imagine it! If everyone were a hettie who didn't breed, then humans would literally end as a species.
I marvel at the level of your idiocy. So shame on you reiki. But thank you too for showing me how much better and intelligenter I am than you.
JoeUser Forums
