from
JoeUser Forums
I just saw an article on snopes.com about an Egyptian girl named Manar Maged who was born with (part of) a conjoined twin growing out of her head. That article contains pictures that you might find disturbing. Go look at them.
I was kind of weirded out when I first saw it. I went into the article thinking of that episode of South Park where the woman had a dead fetus hanging off her head. When I saw the pictures I said "Wow, it's a fully formed head, with part of a torso attached to it. That's kind of gross." What disturbed me was when I read further and saw "The twin could blink and smile but was not capable of independent life."
I'm no kind of expert, but the head looks fully formed to me, and it's capable of facial expressions. My guess is that there's a brain inside that can think as well as any 10 month old's brain. So maybe I should be calling the head "her" instead of "it."
It doesn't look like there's room in her little torso for functioning lungs, so she probably wouldn't be able to breath and definitely wouldn't be able to eat. Ever. But cutting her off from her sister seems to me like taking someone off of life support. Worse, in a way, because unlike some other people who have been taken off life support she shows signs of being more intelligent than a cabbage. Where's the outcry for her?
I know, it's not the same situation at all. If the unnamed girl had been left attached to her sister they probably would both have died. Even now Manar isn't in the clear. This is a rare condition, and she's the first one to have survived this long. It was certainly right to separate them, so that one of them could survive. I'm just surprised that the news stories talk about the second little girl as if she were just a growth on here sister's head. Well, I'm going to remember her as a person, at least.
I was kind of weirded out when I first saw it. I went into the article thinking of that episode of South Park where the woman had a dead fetus hanging off her head. When I saw the pictures I said "Wow, it's a fully formed head, with part of a torso attached to it. That's kind of gross." What disturbed me was when I read further and saw "The twin could blink and smile but was not capable of independent life."
I'm no kind of expert, but the head looks fully formed to me, and it's capable of facial expressions. My guess is that there's a brain inside that can think as well as any 10 month old's brain. So maybe I should be calling the head "her" instead of "it."
It doesn't look like there's room in her little torso for functioning lungs, so she probably wouldn't be able to breath and definitely wouldn't be able to eat. Ever. But cutting her off from her sister seems to me like taking someone off of life support. Worse, in a way, because unlike some other people who have been taken off life support she shows signs of being more intelligent than a cabbage. Where's the outcry for her?
I know, it's not the same situation at all. If the unnamed girl had been left attached to her sister they probably would both have died. Even now Manar isn't in the clear. This is a rare condition, and she's the first one to have survived this long. It was certainly right to separate them, so that one of them could survive. I'm just surprised that the news stories talk about the second little girl as if she were just a growth on here sister's head. Well, I'm going to remember her as a person, at least.