Our liberal supreme court in action.

5 out of 9 does it everytime.

from JoeUser Forums
Now we can see the importance of having more conservatives on the supreme court, the liberal wing of the court, just hijacked america once again.

Now anytime a fat cat wants some property, they pay off someone and poof,, eminent domain strikes.

This is another slap in the face of the american people, no longer is your home safe from fraud, robbery or politicians.

GIMMEE THAT HOME is now the new thing to fear, no longer is a persons home their castle, lowering the draw bridge will not work, we are under seige from the liberals, they plan to take over by force if necessary.
8,555 views 30 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Link

Link

What is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles?
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Are you sure it's only 'liberals' who are creating this apparent fiasco?
Elemental: Reforged
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top

What is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles?

Icon, I read yours first and I AGREE with you!  You are one of the more rational liberals and this cuts across liberal and conservative veins.  It is only the short sighted that do not see this is trampling on the constitution BIG time.  Perhaps it will accomplish 2 things.

1: Get more competant justices on the supreme court.  Those that will not legislate from the bench.

2: Fix the 5th Amendment!  I think there is sufficient outrage on both sides of the fence that it could easily be the next amendment.  Conservatives and liberals banding together for a common cause.

Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

What is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles?

Icon, I read yours first and I AGREE with you!  You are one of the more rational liberals and this cuts across liberal and conservative veins.  It is only the short sighted that do not see this is trampling on the constitution BIG time.  Perhaps it will accomplish 2 things.

1: Get more competant justices on the supreme court.  Those that will not legislate from the bench.

2: Fix the 5th Amendment!  I think there is sufficient outrage on both sides of the fence that it could easily be the next amendment.  Conservatives and liberals banding together for a common cause.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Does anyone have a link to a story with more info on this?
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
Here is one from MSN

Link

IG
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
I have a link to the opinion itself. I haven't read it, but it's 58 pages and I don't expect it to be easy reading. I doubt you're going to find a source with more information that that, though.

Icon, I saw your article. It's just that--strangely enough--you didn't happen to mention my personal opinion on the matter.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
I'm sorry MM forgive my language. What a LOAD OF SHIT!
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
I read an article from Slate on this in Feb. and thought, no way the family would lose. I mean we're not talking a bridge, bypass,etc. It's a shopping mall, or some such.

I can just imagine how a guy who owns a few acres near prime commercial land must feel.

IG
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Reiki-HousePosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005Are you sure it's only 'liberals' who are creating this apparent fiasco


the court is divided along lines, this vote was the liberal wing, with one centrist.
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: IçonoçlastPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005LinkLinkWhat is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles


sometimes I write an article in word first, I do not check all articles before I write or print.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: DraginolPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005Does anyone have a link to a story with more info on this?


I have not learned to link stories brad... my bad
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: InfoGeekPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005Here is one from MSNLinkIG


thanx IG
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I'm sorry MM forgive my language. What a LOAD OF SHIT


the supreme court or me?
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: PJ_Posted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I have a link to the opinion itself. I haven't read it, but it's 58 pages and I don't expect it to be easy reading. I doubt you're going to find a source with more information that that, though.Icon, I saw your article. It's just that--strangely enough--you didn't happen to mention my personal opinion on the matter.


funny how that works huh?
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: InfoGeekPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I read an article from Slate on this in Feb. and thought, no way the family would lose. I mean we're not talking a bridge, bypass,etc. It's a shopping mall, or some such. I can just imagine how a guy who owns a few acres near prime commercial land must feel. IG


shopping mall and office building , riverfront property
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
17 by zinkadoodle
Thursday, June 23, 2005


Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic.


ouch, you really told me.I think I will now stop writing completely so not to offend your sense of right and wrong..

I live in a gated community btw no traffic for me to play in, maybe you can tell me where you live and I could play in traffic there.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I'm sorry MM forgive my language. What a LOAD OF SHIT


the supreme court or me?


Without question or qualms....THE COURT!
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top

Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic


My advice to you would be to go sit in a corner and exercise your right or left hand excitedly in an up and down motion! You don't like the article? Then by God, DON'T read it!
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
Hey MM...whadya think of the reply?
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
I thought Conservatives were supposed to be in the pocket of corporate America. Or is it just that promoting "Big Government" trumps "protecting the rights of the little guy"?


What is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles?


I've always thought this attitude was B.S.

I don't care if 20 people write the same bloody article. It's their blog to do with as they please. "Gee, the NYT covered this, Nashville Courier. What the hell are you doing writing about it?" Give me a break.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top

Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic.

If you cant play with the big boys, go to your sandbox and suck on your pacifier.

Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
My friends lost their home to eminent domain YEARS ago, when the state wanted to put through a highway. They were paid a "reasonable" amount for their home which was less than they'd probably gotten if they'd sold it on the market, but nonetheless lost it. Also, my father-in-law has been fighting ED attempts to take his property for some time. Welcome to America.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I'm sorry MM forgive my language. What a LOAD OF SHITthe supreme court or me?Without question or qualms....THE COURT!


and the left will make sure any conservative that tries to be placed on the spureme court falls under "extraordinary circumstances" and filibuster them.