| A swift kick to their collective yam-sacks would also be aprreciated. |
Yam-sacks? I think I know what you mean. hahahaha
| Which just goes to show that there's some things we can all agree on. Beatings for spammers being an excellent example. |
Which do you hate more, spammers or lawyers? lol
Does anyone remember the exact name of the spammer who was selling gowns?
Did you know that you could shave hundreds off of your annual insurance bill by switching to Mercury Auto? It might be true!
The craziest bit was when I got spam in my "comments" section. I wrote an article about canker sores, and then someone somewhere posted a testimonial-spam about a "miracle cure". Amazing.
I mean, think of all the heroic lawyers throughout the ages. Perry Mason. Daniel Webster (not only is he a nonfictional lawyer, but he once out-lawyered the Devil!). That lawyer from all the John Grisham books. The District Attorney. Judge Harry Stone.
Now, think of all the heroic spamm---BWAAAAAAAAAAAhahahahahahahahahahahah.
Yeah, I hate spammers much more than lawyers.
I think bizowner is funny, frankly. Gotta love the 'mutli-level marketing'. As long as people keep to themselves on their own blogs I don't see why they have to be removed.
| Spam is when they come on to your blog and post ads in the comments |
if you dont allow annonymous users on your threads...they can't.
| The craziest bit was when I got spam in my "comments" section. I wrote an article about canker sores, and then someone somewhere posted a testimonial-spam about a "miracle cure". Amazing. |
yea, I remember a spammer that was dropping their poop on everyone's blog. I laughed for a minute then deleted it off mine.
| " Yeah, I'm tired of that BizOwner dufus using JU as his own personal advertising site too... |
But honestly, it isn't any different than Brad's Stardock posts. I don't think there's any rule against talking about your business on your blog. Spam is unsolicited advertising. I think to make that claim about bizowner would be setting the standard pretty high.
| if you dont allow annonymous users on your threads...they can't. |
These spammers aren't anonymous.
| Not to mention that dude from Nigeria who will deposit millions in your bank account if you'll only give him the numbers! |
Actually (in addition to Viruses), I am collecting those message as well. The latest comes from England!, The Netherlands and (this was a shock) Puerto Rico!
Them dudes are not confined to Nigeria anymore!
| " Baker, the spammers aren't here to debate and discuss." |
Eh, I don't recall a 'debate and discuss' clause in the terms of use. You don't even have to allow comments. How many times do we hear people around here say "It's their blog, if you don't want to read it, you don't have to." Well, that would be valid here, too, right?
I don't see anything different with bizowner than someone like, Col Gene. It's damned debatable whether a bunch of people are really here to debate and discuss. Most look like they are here to declare and treat any sort of debate with animosity.
So, if you are going to say JU isn't for people to showcase their business, then Stardock's "ad"-style blogs on the front page are no different than bizowner's. If they came onto your blog and started posting unsolicited ads I could see your point, but so far bizowner seems to be just keeping a log of events for that business.
One reason to be careful about this is that many people want blogging stifled politically, because they see it as under-the-radar political advertising. We have to be careful how we characterize this stuff, because come 2008 people might be accusing us of "spamming" home-made political ads.
There's no price tags on Bizowner's blogs are there? I don't remember seeing "Penis Pills Cheap!!" or anything like that. I'll go take a look at what has been posted there in the last few weeks, but I don't remember them being much in the way of advertising.
| I don't think there's any rule against talking about your business on your blog. |
Number one, I'm not saying he's violating the TOS, I'm just saying that I'm tired of seeing his drivel.
Number two, he's not 'talking' about his business on his blog. He's basically cutting and pasting Harteis International's propaganda. If he were saying "hey, I just started my own business and this is what I'm selling..." then that wouldn't bother me so much. But, today was the first time I've seen him mention any kind of product by name. What he usually turns out is a Fred and Linda Harteis ass-kissing fest.
Either we're free to blog about what we like or not. I have a feeling if someone posted this kind of complaint about the featured Stardock articles, it would be received less enthusiastically.
Take a look at this and decide if we want to start making such differentiations off the cuff. During the last election, people were trying to say that any blog that linked to a candidate's site was an illegal campaign donation. I, personally, don't relish the idea of being a 'test case' for some campaign finance reform advocate.
Best to leave blogging the way it is and let people do what they like. If a person can have a blog, a business can too. If they really spam your account, then I can see the complaint. Other than that, they are just spamming their own blog, right?
spam much like ham is not kosher and an abomination to GOD.
no offense to you heathens that enjoy ham or spam.
| I mean, do people who blog about the menial details of their day and love life and whatnot intend to debate and discuss? |
They aren't selling something. Other people post comments, offer suggestions and advice. Have any spammers participated in a discussion? Do they post to non-free blog sites?
| If a person can have a blog, a business can too. If they really spam your account, then I can see the complaint. Other than that, they are just spamming their own blog, right? |
They probably have their own websites. This is akin to telemarketing. They're coming here to tell us what they have when we didn't ask instead of waiting for anyone who is interested in their product to go to them.
Someone posting something on their own blog isn't spam. If they post ads on your blog, it is spam. Telling them what they can and can't post on their own blogs just invites people even more anal than you to start telling the rest of us what we can and can't post.
Give it a couple of years. When the primaries roll around I'll bet ya a donut people will be screaming about all of our unsolicited, under-the-table campaign ads that WE call blogs.
| "They're coming here to tell us what they have when we didn't ask instead of waiting for anyone who is interested in their product to go to them." |
If you mean 'here' as in it is our site and not theirs, maybe. Last time I looked anyone can join, so they are as much "us" as we are...
| Which just goes to show that there's some things we can all agree on |
You spoke too soon.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!