Moderateman Moderateman

THE THREE BIGGEST RACIST IN AMERICA!!!

THE THREE BIGGEST RACIST IN AMERICA!!!

FAR AND AWAY, NO CONTEST.

Louis {I hate whitey} Farrakhan the leader of the BLACK MUSLIM NATION, He hates Jews and whites in that order, the best thing you can say about Farrakhan is he is up-front with his hatred, he does not hide it.

Jesse Jackson, uses any excuse to drive the wedge deeper between whites and black, he is a vulture and a blackmailer.

Al Sharpton hates whites simply because he is not white, he is a rabble rouser and equal opportunity bilker.

What the most amazing part of all this is all THREE claim to be men of God.

It's time black America stands up and sees what these three are doing.

None of them want the advancement of racial understanding because that would deprive them all of the money they steal, blackmail and defraud people out of.

While a good part of black America remains poor these three drive new cars, live in huge homes, fly personal jets around.

These three do more harm to America than the Ku-Klux-Klan ever did! The TRUE FACE OF EVIL, IS Farrakhan, Sharpton and Jackson, truly the triumverent of all that is bad in a human being.
19,218 views 66 replies
Reply #51 Top
They are racist because, while they claim to raise money and work towards the betterment of Black people in America, they do nothing but work to keep Black people down, for their own profit.


they are working for the betterment of black people.... themselves.
Reply #52 Top
I did not accept your sources without question ParaTed, why do you think I said in comment #42: "Umm, great so some crackpot posted some article talking about "alleged" remarks by Sharpton, what's the source on this?" I 100% questioned the source. I do not accept things without question.

Seriously, this is what pisses me off. I'm the only one here offering any kind of counter argument and I get slammed with people who don't even read my posts or take any time to try and consider my points.

And I wonder why there is no real discussion on this blog site, just blind leftists and rightists who have discovered some miraculous way to post their comments with their heads buried up their asses. There, now I added to the real discussion going on here, rhetorical garbage.
Reply #53 Top
Seriously, this is what pisses me off. I'm the only one here offering any kind of counter argument and I get slammed with people who don't even read my posts or take any time to try and consider my points.

And I wonder why there is no real discussion on this blog site, just blind leftists and rightists who have discovered some miraculous way to post their comments with their heads buried up their asses. There, now I added to the real discussion going on here, rhetorical garbage.


sus I have neither slammed nor disrespected you. I respect your views even when I disagree with them.
Reply #54 Top
that was 99% directed at ParaTed2k
Reply #55 Top
56 by Suspeckted
Monday, October 03, 2005


that was 99% directed at ParaTed2k


well then make it clear brudda.
Reply #56 Top
the slave trade was started by arabs and blacks, exactly, then sold to white shippers who brought them to the united states. Some how this part of history falls in between the cracks.


Yeah, why is that? Why is it that the fact that black tribal leader sold their own people into slavery ignored? Because it doesn't fit in the the stereotypical 'whitey is evil' image?
Reply #57 Top

I did not accept your sources without question ParaTed, why do you think I said in comment #42: "Umm, great so some crackpot posted some article talking about "alleged" remarks by Sharpton, what's the source on this?"

I will concede and withdraw Sharpton.  I probably can find some stuff, but that would not make him the biggest racist, just another one.  In his place, I nominate Charles Rangel.

Reply #58 Top
Reply By: dharmagrlPosted: Monday, October 03, 2005the slave trade was started by arabs and blacks, exactly, then sold to white shippers who brought them to the united states. Some how this part of history falls in between the cracks.Yeah, why is that? Why is it that the fact that black tribal leader sold their own people into slavery ignored? Because it doesn't fit in the the stereotypical 'whitey is evil' image?


because it's not POLITICALLY CORRECT to point out any bad things about minorites and blacks in particular.
Reply #59 Top
wow whip, suspected should be satisfied now. thank you for the time and effort this took.

xoxo

elie
Reply #60 Top
Kudos, whip appreciate the information, and from the beginning I never had any doubt that Farrakhan would belong on a list like this, however, recent comments about "where is the KKK when you need them," leads me to be highly skeptical of your ability to pick out who the racists are, but these stories about Sharpton seem to speak well enough.

While I have gained more insight into the underbelly of these three men, I will always caution you to label someone as the biggest, or greatest of anything. It seems to overshadow that widerspread smaller levels of racism that affect each of us more than probably either of these three men could. I understand that you point them out as leaders, but there are many other factors that perpetuate their ignorance more than what has been claimed to be their simple desire to gain personally from spreading black on white racism.

Each of us has racial prejudices regardless of what they claim along with a number of other prejudices. Preconceptions about those we are not familiar with or generalizations about those we are familiar with form our opinions and beliefs about certain groups of people everyday. In other threads I've admitted being a classist, and I also admit that I am not half as color blind as a I wish I was.
Reply #61 Top
64 by Suspeckted
Tuesday, October 04, 2005


While I have gained more insight into the underbelly of these three men, I will always caution you to label someone as the biggest, or greatest of anything. It seems to overshadow that widerspread smaller levels of racism that affect each of us more than probably either of these three men could. I understand that you point them out as leaders, but there are many other factors that perpetuate their ignorance more than what has been claimed to be their simple desire to gain personally from spreading black on white racism.


good points sus, I used the headline the way I did to show that while the msm happily points out racisim in whites it loaths to point out some of the biggest dividers and hate mongers are black. SHOCK value headline? grabs attention.
Reply #62 Top
I'm the only one here offering any kind of counter argument and I get slammed with people who don't even read my posts or take any time to try and consider my points.


I didn't see any "couter argument", just you asking us to prove that they are racist. Either way, it did make for interesting discussion, which was the point, so you did well.

For me though, anyone who stands up and tells the world that they speak for an entire race is inherently racist... since that is impossible and implies that Black people (in the case of these three) are all of one mind instead of being individuals who can speak for themselves.
Reply #63 Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, October 04, 2005I'm the only one here offering any kind of counter argument and I get slammed with people who don't even read my posts or take any time to try and consider my points. I didn't see any "couter argument", just you asking us to prove that they are racist. Either way, it did make for interesting discussion, which was the point, so you did well.


intresting and polite discouse, could it be mm peace week has been extended?
Reply #64 Top
68 by little_whip
Tuesday, October 04, 2005


wow whip, suspected should be satisfied now. thank you for the time and effort this took.


LoL, thanks, but it took me less time to cut-n-paste this stuff than it did to read all the comments arguing about sources! (hint, hint, you could have done it yourself, MM, it's your article, after all!)


was kinda hoping sus would do some research himself.
Reply #65 Top
intresting and polite discouse, could it be mm peace week has been extended?


I have my moments. ;~D
Reply #66 Top
70 by ParaTed2k
Tuesday, October 04, 2005


intresting and polite discouse, could it be mm peace week has been extended?


I have my moments. ;~D


like I said before only gene or colongangrene as you call him seems to set you off.