Your first mistake is assuming that the Inconceivable's actions have to be logical in the first place. Logic is a human construct While it is true that the inconceivable does not lend itself to logic, the "Truth" that is "Humanly Knowable" and we search for must be. If you read the words of God in His
Several yeas ago I read a book about "God and the New Physics" (by Paul Davis - pb.1984, Simon &Schuster). It is a good book, but selectivity is rampant in it. In all what the author lists as blatant contradiction between science and religion he mainly uses the Old and the New Testaments. Although he mentioned Islam in the beginning, he never took Islam's view in the
I'd say myself a range of 7000-10,000 years would be my thought My goodness KFC, Meena, the first Pharaoh of Egypt united the country and started the first Nation/Government on Earth 4500-5000 BC that is 6500-7000 years ago. And you saying that Earth itself was created only 500-2500 years before that? May be The Ancient Egyptians were A
I believe that both evolution and creationism work well hand in hand. My belief, albeit unorthadox, on it is that they're both tools of God. We were created, and we evolved. Simple. Nothing more simpler and more logical than that. the Creator of Man also Created the rules of eveolution and the physical laws of the universe. From what religi
Starting with Abraham.....a Hebrew that started it all. He was told by God and looked forward to the promises of God starting in Gen 12[/quote] The bible is clear that no one enters heaven outside of Christ [quote]
"If God is good and good people go to heaven, shouldn't God show up every generation or so and give us the updated version of what he expects They made more rules than God. If any would get a passing grade it would be them. How irritating to hear Jesus say they were not good enough. He was mad, in their opinion. God is "ETERNAL", "CONST
The Jews accepted the UN decision, but the Arabs rejected it. The resolution divided the land into two approximately equal portions in a complicated scheme with zig-zag borders Maybe you should go read this. It might htlp you to understand better Sure the "Jews" accepted it. But who Really
There is a war coming. Western Civilization and Islamic Fundamentalism. I believe that firmly. I don't know when, or how, it will manifest itself, I don't know who all will actually be participating the fact that the "moder
You can't compare what "was" to what "is now"! I hope you are not correct. but you may be. However, i think we should try. The region is worth the try and it is dear to all of us. we can't give up on it. That is what superpowers supposed to do. at least the good dones. the US can pressure each side t
Dont see how you can say it will work when it is not working in Canada to name one prominent nation. I say it will work based on the fact that the partition of the land was an artificial one and the two groups lived together with no major problems for thousands of years before and after the Crusaders. J
How well do you see the One State model working among the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites in Iraq right now? It worked fine for more than thousand year. You judging by what you see now? Iraq is a 5000 year old nation. It always had Kurds and Arabs ( Saladin was a Kurd and he was never considere
If peace was achievable there, it would have been achieved. They don't want it, don't believe in it Not true, Not true at ALL. Take out the biased interference from outsiders and they will live together as they did for thousands of years. Don't Judge the situation by what you see now. outsiders used the
I promised to address the question of how can the US support Israel without creating enemies which our current policy is doing. Considering the history of the area and the situation currently on the ground, following is what I believe could be an acceptable solution to both sides. First, just a brief look at the history: The Middle East and in particular the
Where are the calls for embargos, trade sanctions, heck, military action? Where is the widespread movement in country X to do something tangible about the "greatest threat in the world"? I think we getting somewhere Draginol. It is exactly because of this fact you pointed out, that the fanatics got desperate and resorted to terrorism. I and many
In this very thread you have one guy claiming the US is the greatest threat to world peace. I see a lot of that. But they're not serious about it because they don't do anything about it They don't? The ones who are not "doing anything about it" are obviously just "seeing it" not being affected by it. The fanatics amongst the ones who ha
You insist on 'real' answers from others yet over and over again you tell us how this article is YOUR opinion What can i say now !!!! Please c
I am looking for a real answer and not an opinion I didnt go into the details of how to support israel and not create enemies because it wasnt the main point. But i really have some ideas and i will try to post them shortly. However, to give you and idea about the possibilities, think of T
Firstly, the United States isn't an empire. Secondly, at no time has the U.S. undertaken "empire building". That's just so much meaningless hyperbole that does little more than detract from an already sadly mistaken article. If what you saying is true, why then are we spreading ourselves allover the wor
There, do your own research next time. And learn what the word "majority" means, while you're at it. Good, that you finally concentrated on the issue. And i will look up th meaning of the word "Majority". The issue was not just Israel. Even if it was. I answered that by saying: We can still sup
There are many, many of us who wholly support our foreign policies, especially in regards to Israel. I could ask you to provide a proof for that too. and i am sure you would. and it will be some poll or study from a think tank or a group from the "many many " you mentioned. of course that counts as a
"you need accepted sources like Gallup, CNN, FOX, ABC, USA Today's " and how many times these kinds of proofs were declared "Biased". "MSM Propaganda",.... etc. I am sure you know that kind of thing happen all the time. I usually take the opinion and answer it one way or another. leaving the main issue and start debating "proofs" and "credibility" doesn't really help in anyway. We are supposed to assume honesty, and if i
You went off the beam as soon as you went into the "empire building" arena. how is that? please explain. may be i am missing something.
Show some statistics from reputable sources proving your claim, or don't presume to speak for 'the majority' of Americans. You sound like Col Gene when you do that, and he has no credibility at all. Where did you get the idea that i speak for anyone, let alone the majority? i, and i suppose everyone els
if ya do footnote my quote and identify me as saying it, you can assure yourself an attack from the neoconservative elements here who have been trying to play "gotcha" games with me now you know why i didn't - . But i hope it i
Of course if you have no evidence it seems like a much bigger deal. I thought we assume honesty in expressing our opinions. asking for proof each time you read something you dont agree with sure sounds like what they do in a court room. We are supposed to be writing our opinions, anyone could be wrong or right. I usually answe
JoeUser Forums