[quote]Here KB is some practice for you... leave JU and never return.[/quote] soon as your check for $600,000* clears my bank, i'm voluntarily outta here like a cheetah just seen a gazelle after having had 20mg of usp d-desoxyephedrine hcl introduced to its system intravenously. absent that, we both know there's only one person can effect my non-volitional departure and, based on several years of observation, i don't believe that would be accurately described as merely leaving a
kingbee
i still wanna know more about them 15 person poker games. long as i'm here tho, anyone care to offer an opinion on how differently this incident would be perceived if the couple and their guests were muslims who dressed the part? or, if not an opinion, maybe a guess as to how much they woulda hadda come up with to make bail?
[quote]there is absolutely no connection between verifying someone is a LIVING US CITIZEN and checking trying to block a certain RACE from voting. That argument is just pathetic.[/quote] i guess you musta missed the part of the original post in which id was whining about the department of justice determining there is exactly that connection in the state of georgia. it's the reason georgia's current policy is being halted. as far as the colonel klink thing being rac
ooooops...here's another arizonan being deprived of her right to vote as told in her own words: Testimony of Eva Steele House Committee on Administration My name is Eva Steele. I am 57 years
[quote]To borrow your tactic, I've not heard of anyone who's heard of anyone who can confirm that a legally registered voter presenting to a polling place was successfully intimidated into not voting in Arizona. Soon as such is 'determined to be factual by a preponderance of the evidence as deternined by either jurists or jurors at the conclusion of prosecution of criminal or civil proceedings on behalf of the citizens of the united or any individual state of this nation,' I'll let you know.
[quote]'I'll expect your resignation letter on my desk this afternoon'?[/quote] isn't that a passive-aggressive sorta managerial tool (one employed, i gotta note with some irony, by passive-agressive managerial tools themselves) really a last-minute deal sweetener enabling the terminator to avoid having to actually fire the person to whom it's addressed while simultaneously inviting the potential terminee to pretend to quit and thus avoid damaging his resume? termination
[quote]How can you struggle so mightily against assuring that those who vote are truly eligible to do so?[/quote] perhaps because i still recall when 'assuring that those who vote are truly eligible' meant poll taxes, tests, arbitrary office hours and brute force intended to prevent citizens from ever qualifiying for eligibility status. perhaps it's because i consider firearm registration galaxies less vulnerable to abuse than forcing citizens to "haff your papers mit yo
[quote]You know want else is funny? Revisionist history.[/quote] your attempt to establish inaccuracy as fact strikes me as sad instead of anything close to amusing. firstly, i guess we're to accept in your lil world, 65 or so days is the equivalent of "a few weeks" rather than over 2 months as the rest of the world tracks time. more importantly, from your own sources, polirxo.xom'a headline was: GM CEO resigns at Obama's behest c
[quote]You might recall Obama firing the GM CEO a few weeks ago.[/quote] there's that memory problem thing happenin again. gm's former ceo packed up all his money and left of his own volition several months ago.
[quote]Proof of citizenship requirements would indeed tend to keep illegals away from the polls[/quote] you're still a citizen of the other state which has enacted this sorta law? how's that been working out? by now some beancounter (if not a battalion of them) musta compiled enough data with which we can all see a dramatic drop in ballots cast by those not eligible to do so...or even total votes cast, for that matter. how muc has it cost? a
[quote]voter fraud organizations like ACORN use illegals and even dead people to commit voter fraud [/quote] prove it. rather than jerking us all off with vague accusations or unsubstantiated partisan allegations by internet tabloid journals and talk radio demagogues, please cite data determined to be factual by a preponderance of the evidence as deternined by either jurists or jurors at the conclusion of prosecution of criminal or civil proceedings on behalf of the citizens of
[quote]I don't know how much you know about illegals or if you know any or enough of them[/quote] except for almost exactly 8 months last year, i've lived the majority of my life in what was once known as el pueblo de nuestra señora la reina de los angeles del río de porciúncula. in case that, in of itself, doesn't resulve your concern about who and what i know in this regard, lemme clarify by lettn you knnow i've lived among and interacted with illegals
[quote]Don't you remember how they go around picking them up, serving them food, cigarettes, etc. just to get them to the polls. The ignorance is amazing.[/quote] as is the irony of your conclusion. ignorance is a keystone of allegations such as yours (got any actual documentation or is all that just something 'everyone knows'?). in contrast the brennan centers's truthaboutvotingfraud.org HAS extensively investigated this issue and documented it's findi
[quote]the stupid republicans driving away the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT VOTE[/quote] wanna know who's stupid? anyone who actually believes illegals sit around scheming up ways to get their hands on a ballot. people who are entitled to vote can barely be persuaded to get off their asses on election day. illegals, on the other hand, can't pass up a chance to bamboozle election officials. it's as if things aren't risky enough for them, and they s
[quote]Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel issued the following statement following the U.S. Department of Justice’s denial of preclearance of Georgia’s voter verification process[/quote] 1. your title is either deliberately or ignorantly false in that the specific policy/program to which the doj is opposed is not the 2009 georgia sb 86 which requires new registrants to provide proof of citizenship nor does it require anyone to have id
[quote]The guy that power washes all our homes in our neighborhood even picked up on my neighbor's dislike for Christians.[/quote] "..and verily, the lord god spake therefore unto the masses saying, "lo, yo, it be not comely for thou who art a majority to wallow in paranoia and adopteth a persecution complex, wailing and weeping without end and saying one to another "we shall surely be martyrs' for it is a conceit, and smelleth from up here very much like self-exaltation."
[quote]I know of regular poker parties with more than that.[/quote] 3 tables? what kinda stakes? any open seats?
here's what ya do upon being detained on suspicion of driving while intoxicated in california. you're entitled to select the type of test to which you must submit by law so demand they take a sample of your blood. prior to inserting a needle, the person about to draw your blood will wipe the target area with what? yup! an swab containing alcohol. should the test results indicate alcohol in your blood, well...do i really
who's responsible for all the violins on tv?
jeez, i gotta start payin more attention to my own posts. i thought this one too had sunk into the morass without comment. listening to cheney would be sorta like listening to churchill bullying poland's government in exile into accomodating stalin's puppets, demanding they help maintain the alliance long enough to beat hitler--horribly ironic considering britain launched its war to preserve poland's sovereignity--with one huge exception: churchill may have ultima
call me psychic. or psychotic. or both. wayyyyyy back in 2005, i began telling people i was positive dick cheney would run for president. my basis for that prediction was three-fold: a. he said he wouldn't. b. in his mind, nobody else was nearly as capable or even willing to shore up the bush-cheney administration's legacy. regarding point a, one need only look back to recall how he wound up on the ticket with dubbya. after declaring he
[quote]First of all it was Christ who spoke those words in Matt 10:16[/quote] if, in fact, matthew wrote every word in the volume bearing his name, your claim would still be hearsay. which might be all for the best iif what you're really saying here (as you so very clearly appear to be doing) is that jesus' teachings are drawn in any part from egyptian mythology [quote]In Egyptian hieroglyphics, as well as in much ancient lore serpents symbolized wisdom. (hmmmm wonder
[quote]I guess you never took a walk thru Psalm 2?[/quote] guess again. least now we both know at whom and why he's laffin derisively: folks who judge animals by their covers.
[quote]From a Christian POV we are called to be harmless as doves but wise as serpents.[/quote] interesting edict if supposedly issued by the being you claim to have directly created both doves (glorified pigeons with all the disease vector status that entails) and serpents (pretty much dumb as rocks). if there is a god who personally created those two species, he must be rollin on the floor laffin his ass off everytime someone takes that nonsense seriously.
[quote]Like the 3rd Reich, the Obama administration are firm believers in Marxist philosophy[/quote] aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahhaahah