Now, one could say, who would have the most to gain from lying? Ooops, forgot this piece: Kerry: Lie to become the President of the United States. The Gunner: Lie to get his honor attacked, name smeared and gain no money for it.<img src="../images/smiles/notsure.gif" border=0 ALIGN="a
Yes. Either that, or Senator Kerry was. Now, one could say, who would have the most to gain from lying? Kerry would gain some prestige by saying, "Hey, look at me, I'm a decorated war hero." and we could leave it at that. Or, one could look at the Gunner's testimony about the event. I would have to s
Reply #7 By: Citizen kingbee - 11/24/2004 12:08:49 AM I like how when it is fraud and slander against a conservative, it is "A document problem". But boy how they howled like a stuck pig whe
I'm just one liberal, and this is just one opinion, but I found it disheartening having to watch Kerry continually reiterate his desire to "hunt down and kill" the terrorists. The popular label says he's a liberal, and liberals are apparently anti-defense. So he was forced to continually stress this somewhat unattractive aspect o
Fox is obviously a Republican channel and they report the news the way THEY want too.Its all BS! I think people mix FOX's news reporting and FOX's opinion talk pieces. When I listen to FOX's news reports (on the half hour) or read FOX's news section on FOX news.com, I don't notice too much difference i
Reid regularly votes with the majority on defense bills. As a result it is difficult to label him as left. On an issue by issue basis Reid's views shift along the spectrum from pretty far left to leaning right, taken as a whole, he is likely left leaning middle.
Of course I've seen the movie, but you recommend "Fight Club" as good anarchist reading? It has been a few years since I read it, but at the time I was not interested in the anarchist movements of the past. While in the Book they do use a communal system of leadership, their goals are the same, the des
By the way: everytime I put some time into trying to search out some honest, rational anarchist literature, I run into supremacy propaganda. Have you got any suggestions? If you what a good example of a modern Anarchist, read the book "The Fight Club". The movie is good, but it don't hold up to the boo
neocon isnt the same as rightwinger or necessarily radical Kingbee What is your definition of a NeoCon and a right winger. The reason I put them in the same category is because I feel they are on the other side of Mainstream even if they do branch a little. They are at the same spot on the ch
he differences between a fascist state and a communist one are negligable at best; surely it would be better to use a circular or even spherical model instead fascist and communist states are both totalitarian states--as are strict monarchies, theocracies, etc. spherical model makes more sense for sure.
Sorry to build my own scale but here is my feeling: 90-100 = Marxist Radical 80-89 = Socialist / Left-winger 70-79 = Mainstream Liberal 60-69 =Leans Liberal 40-59 = Moderate 30-39 = Leans Conservative 20-29= Mainstream Conservative 10-19 = Neo-Con / Right-winger 0-9 = Anarchist/Survivalist Me: 40 Michael Savage: 8 Ann Colter: 12 Rush: 13 Sean Hanaty: 19 Nixon: 22 GW: 22
Paul and Bahu it's about the bigger picture and the questions of whether the US war itself is to blame for this incident as oppossed to the soldier I have stated my point: <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="m
Civilized warfare Please tell me what your idea of civilized warfare is. History has shown repeatedly great empires and civilizations that have been laid low or snuffed out by other tribes/nations/Empires that did not follow what they thought was civilized warfare. By the time they had figu
I guess, I'm going to have to start issuing Nurf guns to my soldiers now and teach them how to scream “You’re under citizen’s arrest” to please some people. (While my enemy gets to use RPGs, AK-47s, car bombs, beheadings relief workers, suicide bombers, high jacked planes full of civilians, etc….) 1. The soldier in question, repeatedly said that the wounded insurgent was faking death. By the way, faking death is also a violation of the rule
Money, Money, Money, Money..... Has any body ever thought that maybe the guy is really a Republican Capitalist? In his statement he even says "truth" and to "educate and enlighten" 51% of the people, just after those same types of words have inflamed people’s opinion on the DNC. He has given no money to charity from the proceeds from the movie and gets $15,000 to $30,000 for each university speech he does, even before he ad
PolMach Forums
Which treasonous activities were those? Protesting a war that a large percentage of Americans disagreed with? No. Publicly admitting that he had unauthorized and unknown private meetings with a government that we where are war with, while still a uniformed member to the U.S. military. Which a
Good Post Steve
Now if there s any chance that fahrenheit 9/11 is correct when it says that saudis were indeed flown out after 9/11 than why? Maybe moore exaggerated the reason but still if they were flown out than whats the reason behind it ? Personally if I was in a foreign county where my bother just got done murder
In my opinion your an independent with conservative leanings, you should be proud of the fact that you are registered that way. The only reason I could see you registering for either of the parties, is so you my help get someone with a view closer to yours reach the General election. Just don't register for a party because you feel you must find yourself a label. That's My Two Cents PS: Pick a party and your also
Michael moore does what media is meant to be, critical and objective. I hope my media does not become like Michael Moore. I want my media to report facts, not opinion. It is interesting how a self proclaimed open minded person like
Reply #79 By: doc (Anonymous) - 11/10/2004 4:46:52 PM for drmiler and lee1776 what do u guys mean by 'nothing original' ? While I do not agree with Bush on every item that he does and have no love for the Republican party (or any party really). All that you have said is almost word for word
Polls show the majority of those voting for Bush did so because of "moral" reasons as reported by Draginol and the media, at large. I have issue with one thing. When the exit poll was taken the person asking what was the "MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE" only gave the following options: Taxes Educati
Doc Thanks for proving Draginol's original point. Strange that you say those who voted for Bush can't open their minds, yet I didn't see one original thing in your chanting. That's My Two Cents
PolMach Forums
Reply #2 By: Citizen terpfan1980 - 11/8/2004 4:21:20 PM And if you really want to discuss "theft", how about checking out: http://www.stolenhonor.com/
PolMach Forums
i wonder what nixon's 1968 campaign operatives (kissinger and dragonlady mddm chennault were directly involved as were others) wrote in their diaries after contacting and convincing the north vietnamese to withdraw from the paris negotations until after the election that year. unlike kerry, they didnt want to bring the war to a