I actually saw an interesting picture. All the blue states and Canada combined to form "The United States of Canada" and all the red states became "Jesusland"
JE0192
Not from my Websters, or any other dictionary I can find, online or otherwise. It’s in the new version of Webster’s (and online : <a href="http://webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=marriage&x=0&y=0"
mar·riage n. You want to play this one by the dictionary... hmmm Main Entry: marriage Pronunciation: 'mer-ij, 'ma-rij Function: noun Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposi
Don't bother signing in, it's at the Toronto Sun website : Link
In basic terms what I am saying is that Kerry and his supporters are making a mountain out of a molehill. Ah... you mean like when Bush said Iraq was a threat to the United States?
Ignorant means that you just don't care to learn. From webster's : Ignorant 2 : UNAWARE, UNINFORMED It wasn't meant to seem pejorative.
drmiler : To say that the death penalty (in the United States) is cheaper than life in prison is simply absurd and ignorant. Link Link And if you don't beleive those "partisan" organisation, here's a govermental report : FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY CASES: RECOMMENDATIONS CONCE
"we now know that the oil for food program was a total scam." Almost EVERYONE in the world community knew that for years. It was actaully one of the main arguments of France, Russia and China for lifting the sanctions after the desert fox operation.
One could also put forward the dialectic that the American “right” is just as anti-american with the white-house’s Faith-Based initiatives or even the religious prison of Lawtey in Florida since they are obvious contradictions to the principle of separation of Church and State the American constitution hold so dearly. It’s just a matter of perspective...
The problem in the United States is rather in the dichotomization of its political life. The two-party system it offers creates two massive ideologies to adhere to with mass support and creating these kinds of rhetorical arguments of who’s the rightest one.
The leading "warbloggers" of the time, ranging from Steven Den Beste, Right Wing News, Instapundit, Andrew Sullivan, James Lileks, One Hand Clapping, Eject Eject Eject, JoeUser (back when it was just me) and so forth were saying the same things. Oh yes, those middle-aged men with a tight grip on the blo
Actually, the first country legalising compulsory sterilisation was in fact the United States. Before World War II, eugenics were relatively normal in most countries (including Australia, Canada, United States, Iceland and many others); notably for the mentally retarded. In the United States, it was first introduced by Pennsylvania in 1905 and followed by many other states after (and upheld by the Supreme court in Buck v. Bell trial). Howev
Perhaps you’d be happier with a real blog site instead of this soap opera-ish community. They don’t really seem to want you at their little party.
It’s unfortunate that in American histography, the role of the Soviet Union during World War II was seriously minimized with the advent of the Cold War. In fact, with the bipolarization of the world during that period, the role of the of both new superpowers in the conflict was notably increased histographycally. Hopefully one day we’ll see a balanced view of the War in each culture's dogmata.
unigolyn357 : You can't see a linear political spectrum (Left & Right) as being tangible through time. It is, rather, a limited classification and comparison tool to its given period. The term has grown enormously through time since its genesis during the French Revolution according to the geopolitical setting; rendering it different from region to region and from time to time (and also, quite evidently, on what you're trying to compare). Tr
Do they even realize that Nazi stands for National Socialist. They weren't right-wing in any way. Just a sidenote on this topic : With the rise of conservatism in the United States today, many try to portray Nazism, Neo-Nazism and even Fascism as a form of
Where are these stats? Link
How many innocents were lost to that needless bombing? 62 killed and 180 injured, ALL of them were in the military, during the Desert Fox bombings in 1998. Kinda better than the 13,000 CIVILIANS killed since the
The Iran-Iraq war wasn't for oil, but rather, in part, for the control of the Shatt al-Arab river to ship the oil. However, the Islamist revolution was the main factor that forced Saddam to invade Iran, fearing the Islamist Revolution would reach his Shia population. It is important to note that the conflict lasted for so long because of the western influence. The traditional powers did not want to see Iraq rise to a "superpower" status while they
I challenge someone to find a right wing Internet community that is even remotely in the same league as Democratic Underground. Freerepublic.com -- Alexa traffic rank : 2,451 (wow that's even better thanb DU!)
There is never an updated body count of innocent people who have died in Iraq. The most accurate body count of civilians in Iraq would be at Link
People have the right to write about they want on their own blog. JoeUser isn't really a blog site. It's more a melodramatic, soap-opera-ish Internet community where they all mud wrestle for ranks, points and attention... but albeit, quite entertaining when you don't have a tv around