As far as LINUX vs. Windoze, I have to go with my limited experience and the observation that every tech-savy person who I personally know considers Windoze pathetic garbage and vastly perfers LINUX. I note that not only the majority of servers, but also the majority of print service bureaus run on LINUX, at least for the local intranet. I watched as Windoze wiped o
Then there is the choice of hardware and software. With all kinds of cheap, perfectly good clones on the market, the libraries chose to buy name brand equipment. However, that's a minor issue compared to the software. Any computer savvy nerd can be called upon to tell one just how truly awful the MicroSloth Windoze is, compared to any number of other platforms. <B
Ask the rest of the wield and ask the Iraqis who have been "liberated" by the US what they think and We "have" asked and that is NOT the response we're getting. Unemployment is very low in this country, what are y
The Empire is in retreat. It does not take a Hugo Chavez or Noam Chomsky to realize that the US is stretched to breaking point. The War in Iraq is virtually over, surge or no surge. American defeat in Iraq will certainly hasten calls for a new multi polar world order and Vladmir Putin is already taking steps to make this vis
The problem is that most people take that view and we never see the facts only the accusations. That's a bit rich! Where's your facts and figures? The sole source for this article seems to be the O'Reilly Factor, which is an infotainment opinion show, and the arguments you've made against me weren't exactly supported b
No AQ attacks on US soil since we began fighting back. did you forget about the anthrax attacks? we don't know for sure if aq did them or not, but it definitively was a terrorist attack that we never solved or identified the terrorists even. Didn't succed either, did it? <TABLE cellp
I speek from both my academic and business experience over the past 40 years! Which suck! Christ on a crutch col...at least learn to spell. try "speak" next time or learn to use a spell checker.
"For people who aren't socialists, income inequality is simply evidence of a less regulated economy which is neither good nor bad. " Another LIE. Increasing the tax rate on the wealth by 3-4% will not create anything like socialism. That is pure BS! No it's a fact! Taking from the rich to give to the po
Look, Sean, here's the thing: Someone who knows something about money in the real world can instantly identify people who don't know about money when they argue for things that are dumb. For example, Col Gene (and you) arguing to raise INCOME tax rates on the rich. This is dumb. I recommend getting this: Link-pi-2477
All you need to do is answer the simple question, “If Bush signs the bill will the troops have the needed funding for the balance of this fiscal year? The answer is YES. If Bush vetoes this bill the troops will NOT have the needed funding. That puts it squarely on the President’s responsibility not Congress! WRONG, it puts it SQUARE on CONGRESS!
You're a joke!!!
What are you? Blind, stupid or just plain dumb? Who do you think is in the coalition? The US, all by her lonsome? Or have you forgotten the British, Greeks, Israel, etc.. This is the second time I've proved him wrong. From now on I'll be saving links and keeping count.
If Bush had included the funding for the war in the 2007 budget request rather then attempting to make the deficit appear smaller he would not need an Emergency Funding bill! Do you actually have a brain in your head? The emergency funding bill is because of THE SURGE!
Paladin77 There is No politics in the action of Congress. It is a CLEAR desire on the part of Congress which is a reflection of WHAT the American People want which is to end the Iraq war. If Bush veto's this Bill HE and HE alone is preventing the funds from being available. If Bush had included the funding for the war in t
Paladin77 What you talking about has nothing to do with top officials telling the press about our CIA operatives and putting them in danger. Cheney, Libby, Rive should all be removed from the government. Armitage is not currently in the Bush administration. Get a clue will ya? Operatives DON'T MA
Drmiler You are correct it was not 2006. The cuts were in the 2007 and the proposed 2008 budget not in the 2006 Budget. See my Blog about the 2007 Bush Budget: Bush 2007 Budget is Unbelievable Our President has lost his mind! By COL Gene Posted Sunday, February 05, 2006 on Bush Truth Discussion: Politics B
drmiler The reductions were for 2006 and 2007 in cancer research. There was also a reduction in 2007 for the CDC. Bush also vetoed stem cell research So CHEW ON THAT YOU IDIOT! YOU'RE the idiot!!! You "obviously" did not read my post. The "last" figure was for 2006! And unless you're blind or stu
Her audience was hand-picked and the person who initiated the "health care" issue was someone who worked on HillaryCare I. i asked for evvidence, not another accusation. I don't know....sounds kind of hand picked to me. Notice there were none there "against" her. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF3
Personally, I don't know why we're even sweating this. Do you honestly think that America "wants" 4/8 years of "more" Clinton? I doubt it. This will only happen "IF" she gets into office.
I'm afraid the odds that either Mrs. Edwards or Tony Snow will be alive a year from now are very poor. Not zero, but very much a longshot. All we can do at this stage is hope and pray. And then hope He hears. Besides which Snow's cancer is not "in" his liver. It's on it.
And, to add also, Edwards' wife again has cancer (I have read that it is incurable ?). My first wife died from cancer when she was 25 (back in '98). I know how hard it is to go through something like that....cancer is a very tough thing to go through. Tough for the cancer patient, but also tough for the ppl they leave behind.... I wish them both luck in fi
So now chew on that!
Just presenting the facts. Look at the interviews yourself! McCain was also asked about his bout with Cancer. Then the CNN reporter asked McCain WHY Bush and the GOP controlled Congress CUT funding for Cancer Research in the last two budgets? McCain was DUMB STRUCK. He did not know what to say. He finally said that money for canc
Paladin77 I wonder why Bush could not get the support of other countries for the invasion of Iraq? What are you? Blind, stupid or just plain dumb? Who do you think is in the coalition? The US, all by her lonsome? Or have you forgotten the British, Greeks, Israel, etc..
drmiler There was no evidence that would satisfy the many requirements under the law that was intended to protect CIA Agents. There is no question that Cheney, Bush, Armitage and Libby are responsible for providing information about Mrs. Wilson to the Press. That has been established both with documents ( the memo Cheney wrote on) and testimony by multiple pe
JoeUser Forums