"The answer is yes to all three." Give me a break, by the definition of pi being about 3.14 an increase in radius cannot be the same as in increase in diameter ever duh? And circumference is 3.14 multiplied by the radius squared. So by which measure is the 150 miles or is that straight from your ass as well? No, but I think you
IslandDog The majority of Democrats were NOT proposing a Surge. The generals were against a Surge. What happened to I will listed to the commanders on the ground. Bush had to Change generals to get someone to agree with him! I guess you also discount the election results of 2006! DREAN ON! Sorry col but the congress can do NO
Baker and you are right. We are in a constant election cycle these days. We have what, about 16 announced candidates already (or as they euphamistically call it now - creating 'exploratory' committees). An insider's view: This is DEFINITELY the "runup" to the '08 election season. I haven't taken much time off si
"the gravity is created by the spinning of the core" gravity is not created by spinning, newton says objects attract in relation to their mass. There is no spinning involved. Do tell me that newton was wrong, you already have told me Einstein was. As of right now they are still naming schools after him and not you Pally. "That is what is at the center of the ear
Also since you didn't like my first like on John Edwards, try there. Link Link Link L
SConn1 I have but one more thing to say to you....if you can't handle the heat stay out of the kitchen.
Shamless bump.
I see how it is now.SConn1 may not be the col, but the actions are simular. He starts to lose an arguement, realizes he can't talk his way out. So then he starts with the name calling. And when that doesn't work you blacklist me.....what a COWARD! Just leave it out for "all" of JU to see what kind of person you really are. Below is a cut & copy of the exch
n fact, your article is from december 29th...6 weeks after the congressional elections and virtually 2 years from the next. over a year before the 1st primary... thus proving the point.... Proves nothing. If you had bothered to read it you would have seen it had absolutely nothing to do with cong
i would hardly consider now to be the "run up to the election." if you want to use that misguided and innacurate terminlogy, fine...but google "run up to the election" and see if the pages found talk about events weeks / months before an election, or years. the term itself "run" (as in sprint) "up to" (to the day of) "the electio
drmiler Only by action of the UN Security Council could we claim action under UN resolutions which we did not have. Again I guess you didn't read, just threw out some more talking points. "If" what you're saying was true the UN would be leveling sanctions and other things at us. ID was correct. B
9/11 took place on the watch of GWB. If there was any question about the danger to our country BEFORE 9/11 there is NO question since 9/11. More then five years AFTER 9/11 Bush has not even requested the manpower HE SAID was required to secure the Border WHY? We are still not inspecting 90% of the containers that en
I do wish you'd post in english at least once in a while.
dr,,,what the hell does this have to do with my article? is john edwards in the senate? is he on the foreign relations committee? my article was about REPUBLICANS primarily who lambasted the secretary and the president's policy ... Then "why" did you post this comment? <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor
Go to the link you gave and try to pull up the EPA links. The pages have been removed. Your right most of them are gone. But you must have over looked this EPA link that "still" works. Link
The problem with trying to disprove a negative is that it just cannot be done within the structure of the text> One has to go outside of it. This is also the case with thje WND and its destruction. How does anyone disprove a negative proposition and make a positive statement. Your reply makes no sense t
drmiler We had no UN approval to invade Iraq. Like was quoted fool we actually didn't need their tact approval. For God's sake man do you even read what is posted? <TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Text"
t is Bush who has failed to ENFORCE our Immigration Laws not the Democrats. The last I looked Bush is a Republican. He wants to give illegal’s resident status. CLINTON ALSO FAILED to properly address it! As a matter of fact it's been quite a while since ANY president jumped on this. So what's your point
You have not shown that the drop in salaries for the new jobs has been overcome. You have not shown that the 1 million jobs that we are short have been created. You have not shown that the new jobs are restoring health and retirement benefits. The economy is GOOD only for the upper income Americans. The Low and middle income work
So there are no holes in the Ozone layer? I'm not saying there are because I have no way of knowing, I just have heard the intensity of light is stronger then before because of these so called holes in the O zone layer. Here ya go: <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 c
Silence is consent. WRONG! We just choose not to respond to your idiocy!
am paying $2.32 a gallon. Home heating bills are MUCH higher then in 2001. Bush has acknowledged our dependence on Foreign Oil is a MAJOR Problem, and then does nothing to fax the problem he acknowledges Which is a far cry from what you were paying 6 months ago. And I don't know "where" you get your home heating fuel....but mine has dropped in i
"What was omitted was that it spiked to well over 7% in between. Not that it matters, because you are just here to flame anyone you can get a shot at on either side." Wow you are a quick one. What real purpose are you here for? Do you prefer charcoal or propane, flame that is. Oh ho ho too
It is interesting that you sight UN approved actions by us operating the No Fly Zone but when the UN did not approve our invasion it does not apply. You sight Saddam failure to abide by UN resolutions but when Bush or Israel does abide by UN resolutions that is OK. Try again yo-yo. <TABLE cellp
Congress will pull the funding out from under the president, regardless of the political fallout, and in fact, the democrats will actually benefit from doing that. The troops won't but then it comes time for President Bush to make "hard decisions" instead of the Iraqi's. Iraq should be fighting this war anyway. If they want the d
You're about to visit an external site:
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
JoeUser Forums