Reply #9 By: little_whip - 9/22/2004 10:04:44 PM It's called "emphasis" on a particular word or phrase. drmiller, look at the upper left corner of the message screen where you type your comments. You will see a B, an I, and a U. After you type the word you want to emphasize, highlight it and then click on:<BR
Reply #9 By: Politically Active - 9/22/2004 9:27:11 PM We may be the strongest country on earth, but we are by far the only one. Our international interests cannot be served if we ignore the rest of the world. Its very easy to thing that we can get along without the rest of the world. In fact, there is only one thing tha
Reply #4 By: sandy2 - 9/22/2004 9:10:48 PM Drmiller, could you explain to me what the quotation marks are for? It's called "emphasis" on a particular word or phrase. It's better than SHOUTING.
Reply #12 By: XX - 9/22/2004 8:58:15 PM I'm happy you played the Nazi book-burner with your Albums. Destroying his OWN albums, that he purchased, is not censorship, it's a personal choice. Indeed. Supporters of terrorists is not welcome to enter USA, IMHO. Hear
Reply #2 By: little_whip - 9/22/2004 8:56:51 PM Dude...if you want to read over a hundred other opinions about this, read my challenge..."war for oil? time to prove it." Link The amount of oil we get from Iraq is miniscule, and could easily be obtained elsewhere. Youve offered no hard proof here,
Reply #3 By: CrispE - 9/22/2004 4:11:33 PM drmiler: Did you look at the optruth site? As for this letter, as I saide, politics is the art of the debateable. Both viewpoints have a place. This letter is NOT politics and not debatable. It is the feeling of "one" marine that's all it is.You
This was passed to me and I thought it was pertinent to the discusion.: http://www.hughhewitt.com/#postid927 Yesterday I posted an e-mail from a USMC Major in Baghdad . We have exchanged e-mails, and he thought the audience might enjoy an e-mail from the mother of a Marine serving in Najaf. I left the major
I'm not as interested in term limits as I am in capping salaries. My Bill would state that for every $1000 Congress raises their own paychecks minimum wage must be increased $0.05...how's that for a check and balance? Actually VERY good! Now do you think they'll go for it?
Reply #3 By: Muggaz - 9/22/2004 8:15:10 AM Excuse me, he's "our" president and as such WE are his FIRST priority NOT the rest of the world! They come second AFTER the American people! Which is why Kerry will lose! He wants to put "everyone" else first! This is exactly the attitude I mean... What exactly is wro
Reply #30 By: sandy2 - 9/21/2004 4:53:41 PM Prices are very low. Not so my good man. I don't call $47 a barrel and rising "low"! Here's the link: Link
Reply #11 By: rugbyshawn - 9/21/2004 2:36:13 PM Go to the Judicial watch website Link Even there they state that the navy is not going to look into it despite all the spin the website puts into it (hinting he doesn't deserve the medals)... As Crunchy also says, the navy response on top of what was reported b
Reply #56 By: Wingman412 - 9/21/2004 3:01:19 PM "amug" ??????? I believe he meant "smug".
CBS said yesterday that Mr. Burkett admits giving "a false account of the documents' origins to protect a promise of confidentiality to the actual source." Mr. Burkett and CBS have not revealed that source, but we know he had contact with a Kerry surrogate, Mr. Cleland, who expressed a desire to "counterattack."
Reply #7 By: stevendedalus - 9/21/2004 1:48:09 PM Get a life. Are we now going to derogate the founding fathers' motivations and their stand on the contiuance of slavery? And just "what" does this have to do with the current conversation?
Number 1 the first article is DATED 21 Sept! Also the first article DOES NOT prove your point. "You" made the blanket statement that the USN wasn't going to look into the allegations. I then countered with one that says you wrong. A navy spokesman confirmed on Friday that the inspector-general's office at the Pentag
About the Newsmax versus Reuters comment...well if you think NewsMax is objective and Reuters is not..... I NEVER said that. What I said was just because "either" one printed it don't make it so!
Reply #18 By: rugbyshawn - 9/21/2004 1:06:30 PM For Drmiler, 1) I didn't write that Kerry likes the military (since personally I do not know), I wrote that both Cheney and Kerry's records can be used to show that they hate the military based on your criteria and cherry picking votes. However, you can't refute (and you ha
Reply #12 By: Wingman412 - 9/21/2004 12:55:34 PM Carne Asada and tried it.....All I can say is fooie! It sucked! Then you screwed it up or found a bad recipee ! Maybe ShoZan can link a good one for all of us gringos? Followed the recipe "exactly"! Musta been a lousy recipe!
You might be correct in what you say however, one "no" vote speaks "more" loudly than the others to his feelings about the military. And if you look, his "no's" FAR outweigh his "yes" votes. Votes Against Military Pay Raise (S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #73, Mar 24, 1993)
Reply #13 By: rugbyshawn - 9/21/2004 11:13:12 AM that's very nice but you missed the point of my post drmiler....here I'll even quote it for you... I just wanted to prove to you that both sides can be shown to "hate the military" by using their record against them. Meaning, in case the article was too
Reply #2 By: rugbyshawn - 9/21/2004 11:01:20 AM I agree with Crunchy....however I found that the article drmiler quotes is from NEWSMAX lol So you know it must be true!!! Here is a followup from Reuters....from the Reuters article it appears that the Navy didn't open the probe but a right wing group asked the Nav
So, I guess that means your post is a lie! I hate to call people out but saying things like Kerry hates the military is just not true and BTW I don't think Cheney and Bush hate the military, I just wanted to prove to you that both sides can be shown to "hate the military" by using their
Tuesday, Sept. 21, 2004 2:16 a.m. EDT Navy Launches Second Kerry Medal Probe The U.S. Navy has launched a new probe into Sen. John Kerry's Silver Star citation, after the Navy Secretary whose signature appears on the document said he never signed the award. "It is a total mystery to me," former Nav
Reply #1 By: Madine - 9/21/2004 9:08:00 AM If the old Iraqi government was so great, why aren't there massive outcries in Iraq for it to be restored? WELL said!!!
Reply #9 By: rugbyshawn - 9/21/2004 9:31:51 AM , Marvin Cooley you're a blast! I truly enjoy reading your Limbaughesque rants. If someone disagrees with you they are a moron! If Bush needs to be pro-military, then Kerry must hate the military! Just an FYI Kerry DOES hate the military. You doubt
JoeUser Forums