al quida is losing in Iraq because the people are starting to stand up to them. The ONLY reason al-Qaeda is operating in Iraq is because of Bush!
COL Gene
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 27, 2007Bush in Search of a Positive Lagacyhe has one no successful attacks in the USA since 9/11.can Clinton claim that no. he was responsible for two attacks on the world trade centers.one when he was in office. the second one he knew was going to take place and didn't tell anyone.</
I hope the conference today will begin a process that will lead to a settlement of the Israeli/ Palestinian conflict. However one can not fail to look back at the past 7 years of inaction by Bush. Bush is trying to salvage something that he hopes future generations will look upon as a positive accomplishment of his 8 years in office. To date
Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007WE will see how useless they are in November 2008! (small word time)W no electee in 2008W only get two termsW served two termsW go bye byeToo bad, Crawford! The GOP Conservatives will be VERY unhappy after the 2008 Elections. If the economy w
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, November 27, 2007So, Gene, what you are basically saying is that the Pelosi/Reid Congress is accepting paychecks and perks while waiting for 2009 to actually do their job? And this is what you defend? No- the democrats are trying to pass legislation that reflect what
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007The democrats are on the opposite side from Bush and the GOP on every one of these policies.More DNC talk.Democrats are mostly responsible for the "polarization". THAT IS A LIE. Bush is the one that is the source of this problem-- It is HIS WAY or
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007What planet are you on? The democrats are on the opposite side from Bush and the GOP on every one of these policies.are they or are they just saying they are. Just wait until Jan 20, 2009 and you will see!
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007There is real concern about holiday spending and we could be on the brink of a major recession. . Listen to the gloom doom predictions of recessions. Did you see how good holiday shopping has already been? If you
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007The situation in Afghanistan is getting WORSE by the dayReally gene? Have you been there lately?Bush sent the troops needed to deal with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan to Iraq where there was NO al-Qaeda in March 2003. It's a documented fact gene that al-qaeda was fleeing to Iraq fro
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007We do need the truth. The problem for Bush supporters is that do not want the truth to become known because they FEAR it will show Bush to be something they do not want to admit!Right gene, that's exactly the reason. Why don't you give up on these useless things? </TA
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007Oh No Gene, you mean that prices for ownable property can go down? Say it isn't so!! Tell me, did your mother survive the bout of diarrhea that produced you? YOU are a COMPLETE IDIOT. If you are saying the economy is good you are NUTS! The problem fo
Reply | Edit | DeleteReply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007and everyone of those policies have been upheld and supported by the Pelosi/Reid Congress... so what is your point? What planet are you on? The democrats are on the opposite side from Bush and the GOP on every one of these poli
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007We need to get the added tax from those that got the BIG Cuts under Bush who are the same people that can afford to help balance the Budget. I do not support new spending until we have PAID for what we currently spend!There goes gene again telling people what they can "afford"
Reply | Edit | DeleteReply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007oh, you mean the tax cut that boosted the economy and put more money in the federal budget than it's ever had before?Yeah, I can see why you'd want to reverse that. The Comptroller General has shown that we only got $.50 in new tax
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007If a senior officer of a big oil company has their tax rate increased they do not increase the price of gas because their personal income tax increased! no they get a larger pay raise than what they would have gotten and that is passed on,. by the way that is called cost of livi
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007As long as it doesn't require more taxes from hypocritic oafs like you, right Gene? We need to get the added tax from those that got the BIG Cuts under Bush who are the same people that can afford to help balance the Budget. I do not support new sp
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007If a senior officer of a big oil company has their tax rate increased they do not increase the price of gas because their personal income tax increased! no they get a larger pay raise than what they would have gotten and that is passed on,. by the way that is called cost of livi
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007Higher taxes on the top 10%-- Not on the Middle Income families!and again you cannot tax the rich because all they do is pass it down to the costumer. That is NOT True. If a senior officer of a big oil company has their tax rate increased they do
the only problem is all of this stuff was writen on 2000 era paper with 2000 era ink. made to look like 1970 era paper and ink. in other words the paper work is false. ONLY the order was found to be bogus. The other material and the statement of Mrs. Knox showed that there was such an order and Bush did
Reply By: Island Dog Yeah, higher taxes and more social programs, just want gene wants from America. Higher taxes on the top 10%-- Not on the Middle
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007the story Dan rather ran was proved false.bush's commanding officer is the one that said it was false. now do i listen to a man who would know what the truth was. or to a man who thinks the truth is an inconvenience. The Commanding Officer of Bush
Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Sunday, November 25, 200724 Exclamation Points - TWENTY-FOUR! - WHOO HOO! Looks like you are a BIG ASS.
Reply | Edit | DeleteReply By: DaiwaPosted: Sunday, November 25, 2007You're right - we must find that Justice Syatem quick, before something bad happens. You try the same BS when you no rational answer Yes I had a TYPO. Have you looked at the number of postings with typos?
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007The training exercise Bush failed to attend in 1972 was a two week Active Duty for Training exercise which makes Bush AWOL!Sure gene. You now have a great chance at stopping Bush in '08. The issue is not Bush but his policies. Most of the GOP candid
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, November 26, 2007See Gene, that is your problem. You hold the President responsible for things that the Constitution gives no authority. Apparently to you Congress has no responsibility at all. Your myopic world is a joke... a sad, sad joke. Every one of these wer