Reply By: ParaTed2k The fact you defend Hussein and side with him against the United States of America tells me all I need to know about what kind of Officer you were and piss poo
There are NO provisions in the Constitution authorizing Congress to decide strategic, tactical or technical use of the revenue authorized, the troops, officers, equipment or supplies. For them to attempt to do so is showing their contempt for the Constition. Congress has the power to limit how money
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007ColGene: The only thing Congress can do is either declare war or vote it down. Therefore, Congress DID declare war. The fact they were too spineless to use the term "war" is irrelevant. Without saying we declared WAR there is NO declaration of war
Reply By: joe-pro-photographerPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007not being liked is not against the law anymore. Just my opinion, dude. That's what I'm writing: my opinion and take on things based on my experiences. Discount my opinion if you'd like, no sweat. Follow the trail on Rat boy Rove and there is dirt. Perhaps it'll lea
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007That does not mean the information is not true. HOW can you not be outraged that we have a President and VP that lied about putting our CIA Agents in danger and in taking us to war?Doesn't mean the information is credible either. Someone trying to make money off a book norm
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007"most people would be to embarassed to admit they were being investigated, not proud to have beat the rap."wrong JUST PEOPLE LIKE YOU!
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007The problem is that source after source is coming to light despite his power and attempts to keep what he and his minions have done secret. We will continue to learn more of the illegal things he and his administration have done for years to come.We will continue to hear mor
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007Libby double jeopardy No He was never charged with providing classified information to the press. He could be tried on that charge! <
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007The Republicans spared no effort in impeaching Clinton for lying about having sex with an adult.no it wasn't about sex it was about perjury in court. the court case was about him raping and sexually harassing women before and after he took office. meaning that his lie was imp
The Republicans spared no effort in impeaching Clinton for lying about having sex with an adult. Bush and Cheney lied about the danger from Saddam and took us to war predicated on those lies and covered up the outing of our covert intelligence agents. It was not only Mrs. Wilson that was put in jeopardy but all the other contacts that she had dealings with when she was an undercover agent. What Bush and Cheney did is a thousand times more harmful the
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007They were part of a cover up of that exposed our covert CIA agents!wasn't proven in court that it was the wife that exposed herself by recommending her husband for a job. TIME TO CHARGE ARMITAGE, ROVE AND LIBBY WITH OUTING PLANE. CHARGE BUSH AND
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Wednesday, November 21, 2007That does not mean it is not true! McClellan was one of the Bush inner Circle. It is time to IMPEACH both Bush and Cheney. They were part of a cover up of that exposed our covert CIA agents!Then why didn't he mention this before? Why does he have to wait until his book come
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007WASHINGTON - Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan blames President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for efforts to mislead the public about the role of White House aides in leaking the identity of a CIA operative. this is what the article begins withMcClellan's
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007Let me guess, selling a book....right? Isn't it funny how you liberals called McClellan all kinds of names, but now he's credible because he's selling a book. . Get over it gene, the Plame case is done, it's over, Bush isn't being elected again, move on with your life. </
Scott McClellan, Former Presidential Press Secretary revealed today that Bush, Cheney, Rove, Libby and Card were part of the Cover up of the leak to the press that Valerie Plame was a covert CIA Agent. McClellan said that Bush lied when he directed him to tell the press that none of the White House staff were involved in the cover up. It was all lies Mc
Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007He thinks Congress is there to Rubber Stamp what he wants and in most areas that is what they did for the first six years of his administration. Bush wants Congress to fund the Iraq war the way Bush wants it funded not the way Congress decided it will be funded. He wants the S-Chip
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007The UN said we should NOT invade Iraq!we do not answer to the un. You can not justify invading Iraq to enforce UM Resolutions that the UN did not ask us to enforce and when the UN was OPPOSED to our invasion!
Reply | | DeleteReply By: DaiwaPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007Gene still has no grasp of how the Constitutional Separation of Powers actually works. He seems to think that the Checks and Balances part should be scrapped, allowing 3 fully independent branches of government to operate without regard to or influence by the other
Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it `supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),' that Iraq's repression of its civilian popu
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007Nowhere in the Iraq War resolution does Congress declare a state of war it only ALLOWES Bush to take military action.you and congress are hiding behind words.the president was incourged by congress to remove saddam and replace him with a democratic government. you in your wisdo
Last, history will be the judge of Bush, not us. That's true. History is judging Reagan better than I ever dreamed possible. So, perhaps I'm off here. But if I was Bush's defense attorney, I'd be looking to buy a juror or two. I had a discussion of what LASTING benefits we have from Reagan. The issue that came up was the end to the Soviet Union. After talking about that we agreed that is not as much of a benefit as you first think. They were a known e
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007After two months of delay, Congress may soon send President George W. Bush an emergency spending bill that would supply needed funds to U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the bills already passed by the House and Senate—which have yet to be reconciled into final form—ar
Keep in mind that Congress has control of the availability of the money needed to fund military operations, which in turn, provides another check on the executive branch as well. you see the only recourse congress has after declaring war is to cut funding not tell the president how to deploy troops. Pro
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007never once has the words "separation of powers" or "u.s constitution" ever passed through your feeble brain have they.It's truly sad that anyone ever saluted you... oh that's right, they saluted the birds on your collar, not you. OK you IDIOT READ
Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Tuesday, November 20, 2007For the most part Bush got what he wanted through Congress.Yeah, you're right. That's why we're drilling for new sources of oil in ANWR and why I get to invest 5% of my social security taxes in my 401K. Sure has been a rubber stamp Congress all 7 years. <
JoeUser Forums