I spent 30 years in the military and lost one of my best friends in Vietnam. I hate every death especially when that death does not make our nation safer. We have lost 1,400 of our best and injured 25,000 more for what? To remove Saddam. BAD CHOICE. If we are to remove every evil dictator in this world, all of our children are in danger. I think if George W. is so convinced that the war in Iraq was needed, he should have his daughters join the mili
COL Gene
MSNBC just reported with 2/3 of the vote counted in Iraq, the shiite party with ties to Iran will most likely win with a vast majority and the party supported by the United States will get less than 18% of the vote. We have spilled our blood to have the people of Iraq select a government linked to Iran. What a GREAT achievement!
I for one do not want to risk the lives of our young people unless we are in danger. If the new governmnet in Iraq is like the government in Iran, that freedom you talk about will not last and we will have another problem to deal with. Time will tell. I can remenber when we were told that if South Vietnam fell to the north all southeast Asia would go to hell. That did not happen just as Iraq was no danger to the United States under Saddam.
If Iran West replaces Saddam, we have not improved our security and have used our human and financial resources to create another security problem. Saddam should have been removed by the moslems in that area not by American Troops! If you spent your money to replace a car that did not work for another car that did not work, would you be happy with your purchase? That will be what we did if the new government in Iraq is anther Iran!
What I am saying in that 1,400 lives; 10,000 combat injuries and 15,000 non combat injuries and $300 Billion dollars is not worth creating another Iran!
Myrrander You are correct Bush has won. It will be America that will lose if Iraq turns into another Iran. How would that improve our security?
Bush tells us that we must judge by results. I agree 100%. Events over the next year or so will enable ALL to evaluate how well George W. did with his Iraq War!
Voter turnout in Iraq, which created euphoria in the Bush administration, could turn out to be a nightmare for this country. Although it is too early to have the final results from the election, it appears that the Shiite clerics hold a commanding lead. The net result of the Iraqi election could be the creation of a government similar to the type of
For our dead and injured military I hope they will be different!
President Bush is placing a great deal of emphasis on the Iraqi elections on the 30th of January. Even if these elections are held, there is no guarantee it will help to create a more peaceful Iraq or enable the withdrawal of American forces. The possibilities that will follow the election are many. It is possible that a government may be selected around
The ONLY reason we should have gone into Iraq was to make America safer. That is not what has happened and thus the Bush policy is a failure. If Iraq truns into another anti America-West government when the dust settles, we loose a second time.
sir peter You are so full of C___ If it were not for the US, you woluld be ruled by Germany today. We also kicked you A.. in the late 1700's if you remenber your history.
Iraq was NOT a heretical country since it was never Christian. What was the reason for regime change in Iraq. It was not to enhance our security because rogue states do not attack major powers. They also do not provide WMD if there is any chance it can be traced back to them. The threat that faces the US and other Western nations had nothing to do with Saddam and when we took it onto our selves to go into an Islamic nation we made a major error. Sadda
Parated2K I have agreed with Bush when his policies are sound. I agreed with the road map in the Middle East and the six part talks with North Korea. I do know that Iraq was not a danger to the US and had nothing to do with the radicals in the moslem world. We created more enemies by going into Iraq than we made friends. Almost every assumption that Bush had about the Iraq War were totally wrong. No WMD; WE were not received as liberators- W
The mesaure of Iraq will be the type of government that develops. If it allows radical factions to operate and is another anti West leaning country WE LOST!
Draginol By the lodgic of your 1st post we should have removed our troops from Iraq starting the day after Saddam fell. At the very latest the day after Saddam was captured. The issue for the US is our safety. Are we safer today than before we went into Iraq? Not to end the rule of Saddam. Not to establish a democratic system. Not to please Israel. If we measure the success in Iraq by that objective (are we safer for the Iraq War) we HAVE FAIL
If you look at my suggestions you will see that I suggest the following: Increase the retirement age. Simple fact- people are living longer. Increase the money comming into the trust fund by taxing all earned income Invest the added revenue generated from taxing all earned income ( earned income above $90,000) in Stock Index Funds. That provides the benefits of highet potential earnings from equity investments while avo
Lee1776 I will have to try and get that % UP! I just asked the question about subsidizing the accounts. I too believe you must accept the outcomes of the choices we make. I do believe the issue of the fees on these small accounts needs an answer. The cost to maintain millions of individual accounts will be high relative to the amount the average person will invest at 2 or 4%. We also need to come up with the funding before stepping off into
paraTed2K Yes, Congress is "do as I say not as I do". I retired from the school system and the military and in total receive about 50% of what I made while working. If you add in my Social Security my retirement income is about 70% of my working income. If it were not for my investments and the savings I put away for almost 35 years, I would be in a much worse financial situation. One thing we must do is convince our children and grandchil
Yes, Grandfather, they do show their true nature when they open their mouth (or Blog in this case)!
When the majority see the impact of what Bush is doing, there will be a back lash at the polls. Many who voted for Bush, for what ever reason, do so at their own peril. I hate to disappoint some of you but I have been a Republican for more than 40 years. I am however from the Republican belief that we balance the federal budget not charge and spend. There are certain social programs that are important for society and I'm not willing to just cut th
drmiller & and terpfan 1980 My grandfather had a saying that I think properly describes the both of you it goes like this, "better to remain silent and appear ignorant than to open your mouth and remove all doubt" I do not hate anyone including George W. Bush. I do look at the results of his policies and see we are not moving this country forward in a way that will benefit the majority of Americans over time. If you believe thelac
terpfan1980 and drmiler The BS you two spread on the Blog site is constant. You are good examples of what is wrong with the people who support Bush. You do not know what you are talking about and do not care to learn the truth. No matter, you will pay the price of the Bush policies in the future! I will be happy to compare my accomplishments with either of you anytime. I have included the section,"About the Author" from my book:
Another major priority of the Bush administration appears to be Social Security. President Bush and his staff have been closed mouth as to the exact proposals they plan to recommend. Now the camel's nose is beginning to appear under the tent. First we heard that the 2% diversion of worker Social Security taxes to private accounts might be recommended. Th
One of the Bush objectives for the second term is to reduce the annual deficit by 50%. That would mean by 2008, the United States would still be running an annual budget deficit of over $200 billion every year. There are many who believe other objectives set out by President Bush such as making the tax cuts permanent, changing Social Security with even more debt and