You're getting way too sensitive. If anything, this is serving to dispel the widely (and wrongly) held myth that all Catholics and Republicans want to deny gays their rights. Would mentioning that a white jury had convicted a KKK member been irrelevant to the story back in those days?
philomedy
While I agree with most of your point about flawed logic in her opinions about the war, I think you read too much into the "freaky people" and "serious discussion" statements. I don't think she really meant anything by "freaky people", only that there is a majority of society that is good, and a small minority that has no problem chopping you up and keeping you in a freezer for 20 years. As far as "serious discussions" go, she at least mentio
Look iconoclast, philomedy and I go back a long way. We have argued tooth & nail about a lot of issues..... the only difference between us is that my stuff is not "useless garbage" it has eternal consequences. I don't know that you meant to highlight my response here, but just to clarify, I was not re
The first two questions are more or less unanswerable This is my point exactly. then anyone who seeks a sincere relationship with such a being is by definition morally s
what makes it vibrate I wonder? The article says that theres a ring one can place around it, or something.
I didn't have time to elaborate earlier, seeing how I was rushing out the door when I wrote this, but here's one thought I had about the vibrating condom: How long before the phrase "No, honey, you're great. Now put the vibrating condom on." is heard?
I'm beginning to think that the actual, underlying purpose of these confrontational articles on both sides (whether the creators of them are conciously aware of it or will admit it or not), is to rack up JU points. Was that obvious? I'm new here, you know. Is it something that everyone knows but doesn't talk about? Is it a revela
The atomic wedgie...the purpose of this is to get the waistband of the offending undergarment pulled over the victims head.
Link Well, you all know me by now, tirelessly seeking to enlighten humankind, callously ignoring any and all reference to my own personal well-being, constantly in search of information that will make everyone's life more enjoyable. Today, I bring you condoms. You're welcome. <BR
Did I grow up in the one school system in America where wedgies weren't even considered?
Too true, and rather sad. Insightful.
Do wedgies happen that much outside of television shows anymore? I don't remember having it even mentioned in all of my years of school. I think they got thought up by writers trying to think of a good prank that teenagers could play. In my day, which was all of 2 years ago, unless college counts, in which case it's still my day, we enjoy the good old "circle game." BTW, does that dictionary entry have an elaborated definition of the atomic w
Considering your kind words on my article, I feel obliged to return the favor. I would actually like to ask you to share some of the insights and experiences that you mentioned, as I am not really sure what you mean by that. The article left it kind of vague, so I am not sure if you mean personal experience, professional experience, education? Either way, as someone who is trying desperately to stay in shape despite losing my workout area due
Maybe he's on reverse steroids...they make you look more and more like a skeleton.
Yes, sorry, to me it is idiotic to start the same kind of discussion which aeryk and the others of the JU Inquisiion enjoy. It isn't going to matter whose perspective the original blog is from, it is an invitation to do their usual bland junk.All you do by aping them is encourage their combative behavior. <B
Wow. You are my new favorite person. This is the greatest thing that I have ever read. You made my night. Thank you. Insightful, btw. Now I'm gonna be thinking about this all night...
The first two are kind'a like trying to prove the power of a stick of dynamite with out lighting the fuse. But the two are very similar in that when their power is manifest it will be too late to make your decision....... Not really. It is asking you to prove the power of a stick of dynamite without ref
School newspapers tend to attract the most left of the left to their editorial staffs I don't really know if this is or isn't true, but I don't think this is relevant to the discussion. I wrote about this because it's an idiotic judgment call, regardless of the political leanings of who wrote the piece.
So what if aeryk is an idiot. Does that mean you have to act like one, too? How am I being an idiot? My article was a response to another specific article, and this is the only thing that I am really making an argument agains. My larger point is a completely neutral one, mainly that everyone should stop
To sum up (and to beat the dead horse just a bit longer), it is pointless to ask someone to prove that God does or does not exist (which I think may have been part of the point of this post). Faith is belief without proof/evidence. Likewise, no amount of "evidence" that God does not exist will shake true faith. <
"1) Prove God exists. (without citing the Bible)2) Prove the Bible is the Word of God. (without citing the Bible)3) Prove that belief in God makes one morally superior to someone who does not believe in God. (without citing the Bible)"1. Joan of Arcadia.2. Prove phil is insane (without mentioning sanity)3. Belief in God AND actin
Sorry I took over there with all these quotes Philomedy, I couldn't resist, the boogieman made me do it! As long as the boogeyman continues to bring forth praise, I say let him be.
I have a huge problem with your intellectual grandstanding through posing these questions. I haven't done this at all. This was posted as a response to another article which attempted to cite the inability to disprove God as proof of God's existence. I am not here to deride anybody's faith, or to say th
Religion is the most pathetic way of displaying a belief in nothing. I don't think religion is pathetic, just faith-based. It cannot be proven...which is not to say that there's anything wrong with it. <T