[quote]But a Jew is still a Jew and that's the only thing that matters. If the Jewish religion is true, what a Jew believes doesn't change his status of being a Jew.[/quote] The problem is that so-called Messianic Jews go around masquerading as authentic Jews, yet they have zip status within the tradition and their message is always suspect as it is the message of another faith. We could say they are Jews but not Jewish, perhaps. KFC, You see Je
Sodaiho
[quote]Of course he is Jewish. He no longer practices or believes in the Jewish faith, but he remains Jewish, just like Christian Germans are Germans. He doesn't speak for Judaism, obviously, but he is, to quote Chabad's Web site (article about people trying to quit Judaism) "Jewish as Moses and Ariel Sharon". [/quote] I understand the party line on this, and it may be so from a genetic or matrilineal sense, but from a religious practice and belief sense, I
Amusing, Leauki. In the United States, ironically enough, we had laws on the books concerning who was "Negro" and who wasn't...at least in many southern states. Obama is Negro. Moreover, I cannot imagine Condi Rice or any American Black is 100% Negro. As to a Rice presidency, I actually think she is a very bright woman and a very competent leader. I am not so happy that she was so much a puppet/parrot with Mr. Bush, though. Shabbat Shalom &n
[quote]oh and one more thing Leauki.....have you ever heard of a Jewish man named of Dr. Michael Rydelnik? [/quote] I know you asked Leauki, forgive me, but this man is not Jewish. He is a Christian. Once a Jew adopts another faith he no longer speaks for Judaism. Of course, he is always welcome to return, but until he does he is an apostate. Be well.
Sabrina, You are welcome. /\
And you, dare I say, more liberal? *ducks for cover* Seriously, LW, I keep you in my daily prayers. I have you on what we Jews call our mi shebeirach list. A list of those for whom we ask for healing and strength of spirit. May you continue to be a blessing in the universe. Be well.
MM: Shabbat Shalom. Life: Picard seems to practice a form of zazen in the film that begins with Data running amok. He is taught this skill by one of the planet's "old" female leaders. Everything seems to slow down. Meditation practice of the sort we practice in Zen and in contemplative Judaism has the perceived sense of this sort of thing, but we must be careful not to dwell on this, but to just be present. It is far more clear in the Star Trek series and films that its&nb
With palms together, Good Morning Everyone, In the time it takes to take a breath we are at peace. I often draw a breath and release it slowly, deliberately, experiencing the universe as myself. I do this so often, that nearly every breath is so. My Little Honey, when she notices a moment of breath practice, thinks I am zoning out or even sleepy, but just the opposite is in fact the case. In the time i
May you continue to be a blessing. Be well.
With palms together, Good Morning Everyone, I do not have a sense that one time is any sacred than any other time...or any less sacred. I am reading about Shabbat. Rabbi Heschel uses a story to make a point. Its about two men who basically put themselves in a cave away from people for twelve years. All they do is study Torah, and by this I assume, they do a lot of meditation. They come out one day and se
With palms together, Good Morning Everyone, Today is a good day in the United States. Its Election Day. Many of us have already cast our ballots. Many of us are already in line. It has been an impressive and historic election cycle. Please go to your polling place and vote today. Exercise your right to have a voice in the direction of this country. Its a precious gift and a
Good karma is good karma is good karma. A light touch, a warm word, a hug, all good; but then, sometimes a stern, clear and direct word, a warning, or a report is also good karma. A bow to you, Nurse.
With palms together, Good Morning Everyone, The day dawns with a splendid light over the mountains to the east. The Autumn air is cool and begs to be breathed. My heart is silent, content, and I know that on the one hand its a delicious state, but on the other hand, dangerous. We should not revel in contentment, but rather be content as we raise ourselves up to engage the world. I find myself deciding to b
We wouldn't let facts get in the way of our feelings , would we ID. Geezzzz, get a grip.
My Obama yard sign has benn taken twice...funny, I never would have thought to electrify it. Just shows how different minds think. Be well.
That blasted edit button is not working. Please ignore the comma in the first sentence.
I see that none of you conservatives, are actually dealing with the problem of lower taxes as Larry pointed out, as I have pointed out in far too many posts. When you reduce your income you cannot pay your bills. Its not rocket science. So, how do you Mr. Conservative, plan to reduce the trillion dollar deficit? As to Dr. Guy and his comment about the constitution and taxes, its true, but then, the framer's were dealing with 13 states, little to no Army, no
I guess I must be nine years older than God as i have no idea what you are talking about :) Be well.
A very powerful expose of Bloviating Bill.
A pox on both houses: people are, indeed angry, the right that a liberal has such a strong and growing base, the left that Rebulican conservatives have driven us into the ground (from their POV). I cannot stand the talking heads screaming at each other regardless of the side they are on. So, I agree ID, we should learn to discuss without anger. It is hardly productive to have heated arguments. Yet, the buttons are there for everyone to push: on this list you hav
With palms together, Good Morning Everyone , After a day of being a slug, I finally got moving this morning and went both to the Temple Discussion Group and a hill run. I feel energized as usual. Now, if only I can recall this feeling again tomorrow morning :) As
[quote]And you think 70% was "fair"....is that your point?[/quote] No, and neither did many others, but 28% (which was my tax bracket in those times), was clearly not enough, in my opinion. Then, when you added all those wondrous shelters of the 80s many of us took full advantage of, many rich folks and corps (I understand) paid little to no taxes. Be well.
Leuki, I believe stev's point was that it was Reagon who redistributed. You are saying, I believe, that since the rich earned the money in the first place that it is not redistribution to take from them and distribute it across the board in terms of the federal budget? Am I correct or am I misreading you? My point of view is that any taxation is a redistribution of wealth, whether its a poor man's or a rich man's. How can it not be? On the upswing,
[quote]No. First of all, the cost of doing business as a nation does not have to include social welfare or public healthcare. Building streets and maintaining an army benefit everyone (everybody uses those things) and I have little problem with "the rich" paying more for the privilege. But when tax money is used for social welfare and public healthcare we begin to use the tax system to redistribute money not from the people to the state (as is proper) but from the people
Hi Leauki, You are opposed to taxes, I believe? In the US there was a time when we had no income tax. The cost of doing business asw a nation, however, became so great that we needed a way to pay for those costs. Hence Income Tax. We tend to ague over what those costs should be, at what level of government they should be incurred, and how those costs should be distributed across the citizenry. A structure was made. From that point on,