Oh, and if you dont think that Catholics are persecuted just as badly, more so in many instances, than Atheists, you have not lived in the rural south. I lived in the deep south for 10 years (Louisiana) half of which was in a rural area. I never once heard of any catholics being persecuted. There were
davad70
But what they may NOT do is tell me and MY family what is/isn't appropriate for us to celebrate. Did someone come knocking on your door and forbid you to celebrate Christmas? There is a major difference between keeping religious songs, displays, etc out of public schools, govt. buildings, etc. and some
I dont beleive any of them are trying to remove Christmas from the lexicon. You're right they are not trying, they did. The white house also started calling the Christmas reception for children a "Holiday Reception". They also changed the name of the Christmas party for the press corps to a "Ho
Actually, most of the atheists that are behind this caucus with the democrats. Birds of a feather. Pretty much, yes. Most of the groups who help these "offended" people are very
Why is it that you guys always tack this onto liberals? You think they are the only ones getting rid of the word Christmas from the holiday season?
When peabrains come in and start saying "F*ck soldiers, they're murderers" and such, you might want to be speficic as to what parts of their ethos you are offering credence to. Ac
davad, you were the one looking fondly back to the hussein days as if women wearing jeans was some big friggin point. YOU WERE THE ONE trying to make the point that democracy was somehow failed because women couldn't wear jeans. What other choice does one have but to think you only value democracy when the people make the
And he never said that. Better re-read his assertion, and your replies. Women were walking the streets in JEANS when Saddam was in power. This by itself is an absolute
On top of which I wouldn't believe any thing from SF. Mine's from wikipedia, an unbiased site. Too bad you can't say the same about SF. And your 3rd one? By Gregory Elrich? A self proclaimed "activist? You still insist that women would be stoned to death for wearing jeans in Iraq while Saddam was in pow
You know you really should check your links better "before" you accuse "me" of not doing my research. Every link that you posted is from AFTER the war started (2003 to 2005)and we were in the process of "removing" Saddam. So unless you can provide either a picture or some link from before we went in, my comment about it being a l
This by itself is an absolute LIE! Show proof "i,d-ten t" (Sound or write it out!) During Saddams reign any woman caught outside dressed like that would have been stoned to death Actually it's fairly well known that women were allowed to wear jeans in Iraq before the removal of Saddam. Obviously devout muslim women would not wear jeans before
I haven't served in the military. I probably never will. Probably? Are you contemplating enlisting? With recruitment quotas falling so short lately, I'm sure some recruiters would love to get their hands on you. With you being a very intelligent man who wholeheartedly supports the war, they'd love you. The US cannot (contrary to what some left-wing fringe Europeans think) just send the military in on a whim to ove
Guess the idiots of the democrat party cant. If there's anything you know, it's idiocy. I wonder where you got all that insight into the mind of the idiot, to the extent that you spot them so easily. </fon
Given the comments made here I found this passage at TPM Link pretty relevant and accurate; Yet, Republican media types have been leaning hard yesterday and today on reporters to push the bipartisan corruption line, even though the simple facts of the case simply give no basis for it whatsoever. It's actually close to laughable. The simple truth is that Democrats in Washington today just aren't in a positi
You just contradicted yourself. First you say CNN or any of its employees did it then you say it was an operator with an agenda. Make up your mind. You don't read so well, do you? <TD class="mb-Body-Qu
MM waks through looking for that one good thing the left has done recently.... Maybe you could be a little more specific on what your criteria for "good" would be. Considering the fact that they don't have control of congress, their deeds are not as easily measurable.
Politicians are corrupt. Only ignorant and dishonest people pretend one side is more corrupt than the other. Any shenanigan-spitting contest would be a draw - in that regard, neit
true. But you can google each one. Come on...there are way too many GOP misdeeds to google and link to each and every one! <
Just dont use Salon. That is a dead giveaway. It was just easier using that particular article since it has all the info in one article.
Ok, Rosten is old. Now want to splain the others? Well, Berger did his deed in 2000. That's almost 6 years ago. The three that I listed initially are stories that have broken within the last month or so. Warner? Which Warner are you talking about?
Very good. Now list the democrats. you know, like Sandy Burgler, Rostenkowski, Warner, etc. In case you didn't notice, these are all recent. But notice, none are in the administration. Hmmmmmmm..... </TABL
Eight term GOP Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham pled guilty to conspiracy charges related to securing defense contracts for bribes. He also Pled guilty to tax evasion. Cunningham admitted to accepting $2.4 million in bribes to steer defense contracts to his fellow conspirators. Cunningham has resigned from his post. Link When G
I love how you righties are trying to pound Berger into the ground right now to shift the focus off of Bush's gang. We dont have to try to pound, he has the shovel and is digging his own hole. What's the matter Doc? Someone edging close to you in the point standings? Now you need to drudge back
I showed you facts. I showed you that the GOP resolution was in fact(according to the dictionary), a bowdlerized version of Murtha's resolution. No, you showed me where the GOP resolution was exactly the same! Or are you really ESL? English is a difficult language. You should go for reading comprehension </TABL