And if (by miracle) any of these candidate, when elected, proves to be an actual GOOD president? You will still be pissed off?
Cikomyr
[quote]Because Huckabee will bring in the Conservative Christian Base. They will not vote for the democrat, but they will consider sitting it out. [/quote] Romney would bring a bigger economic conservative base, and I am sure he would make an excellent Vice-President, while Huckabee would probably make independants flee on sight.
How does Huckabee won anything? Wasn't it McCain's supporters that allowed him to win some of the primaries? In that case, why would McCain offer a Vice-Presidency to someone who's only success is due to his own political tactics?
[quote]Second......at least we know these two are getting along......[/quote] not really. He simply see (as he should) Romney as the true treath.
[quote]It's called double teaming. Political manuevering. It happens all the time. It's political. McCain's supporters went to Huck instead of Romney. It's politics especially in caucus states. Delegates are shifted. [/quote] Lol. And after you admit that, you are saying that McCain's vice-president might by Huckabee? After we all know that Huckabee's wins are the result of McCain's political tactics? He would be much more intelligent to take Romney, since his own wins will be
[quote] but Cikomyr is entitled to his opinion[/quote] which one?
how good has fleet automation been developped? Even if micro-management is not required, do I still need to babysit a major fleet attacking a system?
[quote]homosexual Boy Scout Leaders, and homosexuals serving openly in the military[/quote] I still want to know why these are a bad things. An openly gay scout leader is much less probable to be a pedophile than one in the closet. And I still need a good reason why gays can't be in the military. And what do you call "pro-homosexual indocrination"? Simply telling people that being gay is all right, and it doesn't make you a freak is pro-homosexual indocrination?
[quote]These are somehow bad things? ~Zoo [/quote] some conservative can't put into their mind that their exact view of what is the best conservative attitude is not the same than other's.
one thing funny. I heard that Limbaurgh (I can't spell his name) said that: "The Republican establishment is behind McCain, and that's the only reason why he wins. The true Republican people DON'T WANT HIM" (or something like that. It's hearsay I've read on this forum) But the more I see it, the more I watch republican voters choosing him, and the more I see republican-controled media bashing him. The more I see high-standing republican (a.k.a. the establishment) trying to make
Strange. In our medias, here, it's moslty reported that it was Clinton and McCain who won the lion's part of yesterday's primaries. Aren't they ahead in the del. count?
Hi there. It's been a long time since I downloaded my beta version of this game. I had a lot of fun with it, but there was one thing that nagged me during my games, and it was the poor AI of fleet management on the tactical level. My fleets were running like headless chicken in a mass of gauss cannons while not even using their long-range strike advantage. Now, I'm in the middle of a good game of X-Com, and I don't really dare downloading the most recent version of the game until I feel
[quote]Or simply that all blood donated, regardless, be tested before being made available for use[/quote] I know that in Quebec, they already do that. Why wouldn't be done in the U.S.?
[quote]When you elect electives, you are no longer a democracy, but a democratic republic. I understand representitives, and believe in that system. The system in which I don't believe, though, is the 60% of the country that automatically "allies" because four more people in the state liked Huckabee. If I lived in Georgia, and I vote for Romney, its as if my vote doesn't even matter. I have no say, because more of the people where I live like Huckabee. I don't think it should work that way, I th
The principle that "winner takes all" is used in most modern democracy. Actually, I think that even Rome's republic sorta used it to elect it's Consuls. If you are electing 1 leader, it doesn't make sense to divide it's autority proportionnally to the % of vote it received. You elected A leader, so he wins ALL the powers linked to it's new position. Now, in many democracy, you are electing representatives. Each county has 1 representative, and the election is not determined by
[quote]And I am also sad that these idiots are in a position to "teach" (and I use the word lightly) and influence our nations young. As is demonstrated by some of the quotes in the article by the "students". [/quote] not to forget people like KFC who continue to propagate stupidities and ignorance about some people's birthbeing on the guise of "free speech"
[quote]Okay. What I wanna know, is who in the KRAP came up with the stupid "winner take all" idea for the Republican delegates? Why????? It freaking ticks me off that McCain can beat Huckabee and Romney by two hundred votes, then TAKE all their votes. I'm a republican... but what were they smoking when they decided to use electoral vote system? Any explanation? I'm so mad[/quote] ... the founding fathers with the Electoral College system.
Lol. You mean, you still have hope for the big Theocrat to become elected?
[quote]Another thing: China actually doesn't need to match the military might of the US to successfully invade Taiwan. It just needs a creditable nuclear deterrence (with Russian assistance), the element of surprise, and a somewhat stronger navy than now. The Russian supersonic cruise missiles are a significant threat to American carrier groups, and Taiwan is on China's doorstep, but a long way from the USA. I believe that if China wanted Taiwan badly enough, they could conquer it even today, th
[quote] I am still convinced that any person not able to be smart enough not to be taken in by a cult has serious mental limitations that prohibit him from being president.[/quote] My god. He was RAISED as a mormon. Do you think people have a clear choice when you brainswash them as a kid? Catholics, muslims, Protestants, jewish, etc... all of them brainwash their kids into believing that their religion is the True One (some of them with more success than others). Why would you
On 23th day of the Month January 2008, the hacker group called themselves "anonymous" declared a war against the Church of Scientology because of their abuse of the law and choking of free speech. The war declaration video can be found easily on youtube - until the Church of Scientology somehow blackmail Youtube to take it down. The link lead to Wikinews' article about this declaration
[quote]Solar panels are actually not very efficient. They are working with nano-technology to improve their ability to absorb multiple wavelengths of light. When solar panels become super efficient, this technology will be great.[/quote] A french engineer created a car that works on compressed air, and is quite safe and efficient. It can reach about 80 mph and you can go on 500 miles on a tank of gasoline (it uses an hybrid system, which fills the air tank while the regular engine is in
[quote]He begs for relief on OPEC oil prices. He slags off Iran as a perpetrator of evil deeds but he does it to a mainly Muslim audience some of whom are neighbours to that Muslim country.[/quote] I (sadly) find this a little funny.. in short: "Bring oil price down please" "Please join me in the polarisation of the region which will bring more instability, which will rise oil price"
My collective insurance teacher actually explained to me the rise in medical cost: People who have a health/medicine insurance that makes them pay a minimum, then cover the rest of the bill don't tend to look at the price they have to pay when they go to the doctor. They don't care if the M.D. prescribe them a 140$ item even if a 20$ generic could do (almost) the same work. Also, pharmaceutical companies usually woo (but not bribe) M.D. to make them prescribe THEIR own medicati
Recently, Saudi Arabia governement declared that it's country would not be used as a launchpad by the U.S. in an eventual war against the Iran. The more the time rolls, the more I see proofs that the United States of America is weaker after Bush's presidency. Allies have difficulties trusting your country. I don't say that it is Bush's primary fault. Maybe it is, maybe not, but a lot of countries, around the world, are less eager to help the U.S. in any possible military ventur