. i don't know about canada. out social welfare rate is dropping in the mains provinces. But I hate the way we use pseudo-legal Mexican farmers to help our crops. They are treated very unfairly because of the legal limbo in which they are positionned. If work was allowed openly and freely on both sides of the border, our it would be simply outlawed to treat them the way they are treated.
The point is they "do" vote, whether eligible or not. Votes from ineligible & nonexistent voters have been critical to the Democratic Party since 1960, if not before. And when anyone, such as a Republican, challenges those "votes," they are accused of trying to disenfranchise "voters" whose undocumented eligibility (or existence) is considered by the Democrats to be unassailable. And they always throw in an allegation of racism just for grins, since they also assume th
I have heard quite a few people here complaining against any political organisation that would look like the European Union, but applied to North America. Since no name has ever been give to such hypothetical organisation, and "American Union" is somewhat applied to the U.S.A. anyway, I will use "American Alliance" (and anyway, it has a nice ring to it) I'd say the U.S.A, the U.S.M, and the Canadian Federation would all benefit from such political reach between our countries. 1
The only reason many so-called Democrats bother to vote at ALL is because the local Party sends free buses into the projects, offering free crack cocaine, fried chicken, ugly white girls, and 40oz liquor to anyone they can pick up and transport to the polls. that is probably the most single greatest stupid/invented allegation I ever heard while trying to smear democrats.. or any political parties. And still, I don't get your point. What does the
In a game like SW:EaW every shot fired by a ship is exactly that a shot. God I hate trying to shot down a correlian gunship with Destroyers. These things just zoom around, dodging everything you throw at them. As opposed to seeing warp in a Nebulon Frigate, which get clobbered and killed in about half a second.
Problem four: No argument. Neither party is "good" for the economy; it's pretty much spin. 70% of the U.S.'s debt has been generated under the last 3 republican presidents If your immigration solution is implemented, the Dems will never win another election. They depend too much on the votes of illegal aliens, felons, and other ineligibles, referring to them as 'disenfranchised. ...? duh? what? Lemme rer
then how come the only ones you ever attack are the republicans. how come the only ones you ever attack are the liberals? If the majority of Americans really wanted the war with Iraq to end, the democrat controled house and democrat controled senate would not have any problem forcing Bush to withdrawl the troops. since Bush can veto anything the congress agrees on, it doesn't work that way. And there is
Insurance is great, if you can't bring yourself to save money, or if you have a horrible disease that costs a ton of money to treat (so long as you had insurance first). Basically, if you saved the premiums you would have paid instead of paying them, as a sort of 'health' savings, you should have enough money for care. that's not 100% true, because if you get a medical problem in the first few years, maybe you did not saved ennough money. And i
The one running out of resources first is the one that loses. So manage your economy well. I usually use LRM to destroy the opponent's mining facilities early, in order to cripple his. I would use fighters, but I find them too effective against gauss cannons
Hmm.. After 5 crashes, I threw the towel, and went to play SW Battleground for a little bit, and then tried again. And it worked.. Well, maybe SW Battleground is the problem to my bug?
DXDiag, coming up! I did not changed resolution, or had any chance to push more button than one... ------------------ System Information ------------------ Time of this report: 9/25/2007, 21:59:35 Machine name: USER-70B87C51C7 Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 2 (2600.xpsp_sp2_gdr.070227-2254) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: ASUSTek Computer INC.
I simply know the basic mathematic theory behind insurance. But the problem is that people are getting healthcare without paying for it, so the solution is... mandatory insurance... but people will still get healthcare without paying for it, even though they have insurance - because of pre-existing conditions, etc. So it's a non-solution that looks good on paper, to some people, but is terrible in practice The trick is universal healthcare. Or at least,
Hi there, just downloaded it. Opened it 2 times. The first one crashed after about half a second, and the other time, it was after I opened the Single Player menu. The screens gain some smalls yellows snow that covers it, and mouse/keyboard becomes innefective. I have a regular (but quite recent) computer. Dual core, Nvidia video card, 2GB of RAM, windows XP, the most recent drivers. I had problems trying to run Europa Universalis 3 a few times ago, but the problem was solved after I ch
And what kind of coverage will they give us? Not full coverage, for sure! Pre-existing condition? Still excluded! Need that operation? We don't cover THAT one... Want to see a certain doctor? You don't have that right. If you simply knew the basic mathematic theory behind insurance, you would understand why insurance company act that way. It is about risk management/cover. But there is no risk in insuring a pre-existing condition.. more like a certainty.
Miami Herald, 20th September 2007 Page 11A "White men talking sledgehammers to the door of the jailing house in MArio, Ind., intending to murder three African-American priosnners. The sheriff orders his men not to interfere. White men hearing testimony tying two white defendants conclusively to the kidnap, torture and murder of a black boy in Money, Miss. The jury takes less than an hour to set them free. White men with badges arresting three civil right worker
My god, the arguments are flying really low in this thread. Bad boys, now get back to kindergarden! Ok, seriously.. The problem with people like this (and I wonder if Blackwater is the same), is that they exceed their legal boundaries and are sometimes encouraged by the "powers that be" to go beyond their brief. I think the problem is, the U.S. security company in Iraq don´t have any legal boundaries. The U.S. forced the IRaqi governeme
There is such a thing as posting on topic. Or you can just be another Col Klink and post the same things on every topic regardless of the contents of the original article There is such things as posting in the relevant forum. There is one called "current event". The fact is, the poster posted this article in the politic forum trying to rise support for the U.S. presence in Iraq. I offered a counterpoint, simple as that. No criticizing (horrible
Take another look at the kids eyes - you think he cares about political debating points. stupid populist point trying to bring emotion into an argument Be happy they saved a young life, and leave politics for another more appropriate thread. hey, guess what? this is the "politic" forum! So be happy they saved a young life, but you can still be unhappy about the whole crappy Iraq has became in the past 5
what were they supposed to do wait or save. you don't get it, don't you? I am not critizing U.S. Army's efficiency at saving a boy. I am critizing the Iraqi Army & Security forces for having to rely on a foreign army to do the basicest service an army is required to do.
And can you give me 1 reason that at the age of 52, that I should learn another? Well, you only "learned" 1 language. Your primary language isn't much "learning" as "growing" into it. I grew in French (I consider myself lucky. French is quite, quite hard to learn), and I learned - still mastering - english. So.. 1 reason at the age of 52, that you should learn english? - Intellectual challenge/amusement - Be able to read Fr
"Lazy to learn French"? I learned English and Spanish (Mexican type), that ain't enough? clearly, no What is your first language?
After living through most of the 40 straight years of Democrat control of congress, that was my biggest disappointment with the Republican one. I actually thought things would be different. Live and learn. Well, in the past 40 years, the majority of president had been republican (or so was my impression). Reagant did pretty well reducing the governement's spending with a Democrat congress, didn't he? And Clinton managed to have a pretty balanced
More like 50%. That is so right. I'm sorry, the poor guy is left with 5 million dollars he didn't earned. He inherited it. Life IS unfair, after all.
Well, you know that increasing taxes on the rich people in order to supply services to the MIDDLE class (underline MIDDLE class), which they won't have to pay, will help a lot toward increasing the spending power of this middle class? Spending power OR saving power. Which mean it's possible to increase the number of people considered "rich". If someone becomes rich during it's life, he should be grateful to have received a little help from the gov, and pay his taxes. If someone was BORN
Basically, he has no arguments, just a lot of allegations and black helicopter ravings. Since he has not really published anything original, it is hard to say if he is a made up caricature, or some one in desperate need of psychiatric help. Well, we already have Col Genre and Danielost on this forum having that kind of attitude. I guess we still have room for more, sadly.
JoeUser Forums
Sins Forums