Brad's attention with that one! I pray every night that he will act on it in one of his 2 next games (not counting DA). It would be a good way to see your tactical genius at work without having to micro-manage every battle again and again and again. Even if many are the sames.
bump..
Bump I really love this idea
Yup we are a new country only 230 years old not 400. In those 230 years we surpassed the thousand year old governments in every thing except cruelty and stupidity. France is much older than America. They can barely feed themselves and are fast working their way to third world status. America created a way of living that is much different than the rest of the world and betw
No, it wasn't luck; it was hard work and determination. This, coupled with persoanl freedoms, that is to say, the minimized involvement of government in people's affairs, during the first 150-200 years or so, led to our emergence as an economic power. Left to their own devices, people will find ways to succeed, significantly buoying the tax base and the economy. It's o
(from my post in https://forums.galciv2.com/?forumid=162&aid=123277#957336) Military Doctrines A empire-wide leader hasn't the capacity to take charge of every single battle fought under his command. There are usually just too many things to run, too many battles to be fought for a single man. Many people thinks the Leader should only be able to run strategic and logistic movements. However, there is a way a leader could have ways of inputting battle ord
I know exactly what it did, just as the collapse of the USSR had a similar effect there. Some people simply can't govern themselves and have to live under the thumb of a greater power. The Iraqis might be that way, too, but they at least deserve the chance to try...which, even given their immensely long history, they've never, ever had. It seems
Well, if you stop spending money on espionnage on a race (or agents), why would you be up to date with their buildings, techs and ships?
It's all about ideals. Islam -vs- Us? Christianity? the west? Islam versus....themselves, perhaps? To allow women to have a job, to study, and have the right to choose their husband without fear of being punished by their family. To allow everybody to have their religion of choice, and no one is diminished because of it's
Well now here is your chance to prove yourself right. Point out the lies and see what happens, or you can hide behind generalities and keep your point of view. "Waterboarding is not a mean of torture" A lie and attenuation to make U.S.ers feel not so bad
(posted in another post, but I though it deserved it's own blog) This topic regards the actual dangers the Muslims are to the Occident as a whole. I am not speaking of "danger of people being blown up" (your chances of dying of cancers are way higher), but the danger to our actual way of living You should consider the fact that, if Islam is really at war as a whole against us, then it's doing a quite poor job winning. But in the scale of their actions, they couldn't do better.<
You should consider the fact that, if Islam is really at war as a whole against us, then it's doing a quite poor job winning. But in the scale of their actions, they couldn't do better. explanation: Extremists Islamists are using terrorism against us. what is terrorism? In short, it's a guerrila warfare targeting only the civilian population, in order to spread terror, and lower morale. They cannot hope to destroy us all. They haven't ennough people or weaponry to blow
Silent and Mr. Greene are people that listen to hate speech and like what they hear. It is difficult to reason with them and always easy to tell when they lost they start attacking the people not the topic. Funny, on this side of the fence, it's seems that YOU listenend to hate speech, and drank every lie or "attenuation" americans may have said
What a crappy nationalism masturbation I've just read... Americans are despised because they act all around the world like they own everything. American tourists are the loudest and most irrespectuous people you can encounter on vacations pretty much everywhere.
I cannot, will not agree, treason is the act of a coward and someone that hates their country. No. You simply oversimply. You think that all is white and black.
Geniocracy may have it's advantages.
arg. Written Lapsus. I rephrase: I applaud any act, treasonous or not, made that helps the cause of peace. May it be remotely. (lol, "helps the cause of help")
I am not going to argue what is a known fact,, the united nations is anti-american! I am going to challenge that "known fact". Bring me proof that the United Nation, as an organisaiton, is anti-american, and not simply used as a tribune by some anti-american countries. It's utter stupidity. At the least. <TABLE cellpadding=8 wi
As a sovereign nation, we act when we think it is time too act. America cannot and should not wait for "permission" to defend itself. You were in no way threatened. No WMD, no Al-Qaeda ties. You have emptied this country of any juice or strenght with the embargo. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Bod
So in essence you applaud treasonous acts done by military officers. Ye of twisting and dishonest logic! I applaud any act, treasonous or not, made that helps the cause of help, may it be remotely. Now, I won't applaud ANY treasonous acts.
Indeed. They managed to link "Invading Iraq" with "Defend against terrorists". Well, the whole world warned USA, but they didn't listened...
refusing to change the course in Iraq wasn't "wrong" by itself. however, they SHOULD have kept a closer eye on all of Bush's policies. That is the Congress's job, after all. They should have noticed that Bush's plan in Iraq wasn't holding right after he announced "Job Accomplished". No, I take that back. They should have noticed that the whole war was aiming an impossible goal in the begginning. And EVEN if you though the goal was reachable, nothing was rightly done to achieve it. <
And just for "your" edification....what kerry did is considered treason and as such is more than just against the law. Also what he did in NO way, help to end the conflict in Vietnam. And as a side question....how did what he said about his fellow soldiers have anything to do with ending the war? - Considered treason : checked. Let's drop this p
Please do not lump the congressional slop with the current administration. They are not one in the same. For you to lump them together they would have to been put in/ appointed to their office by Bush. But they weren't. they haven't done their jobs into protecting american citizen's interests, and USA's financial integrity. I do not lum
No, it was "republicans"! Awww.. man.. I suck at guessing.. Lucky for them they did so, rightly oh? I mean, hey, that was a courageous political act, to expulse someone who tried to abuse a page!
GalCiv2 Forums
JoeUser Forums