Well I guess my post critisizing stardock was immediately deleted.... Yet another reason I won't pay for their toys....
Shadow Lord
Yeah, stardock is notorious for not providing easy to find descriptions, sys req, change logs, manuals, etc.... Its one of those thigns that keeps me from buying the programs (amongst a few other problems)... They seem to have nifty toys (windowblinds, IP, etc...) and a some coold ideas (multiplicty) but execution and support is very questionable...
So when is the rest of this suite goign to be ready? I know we have multiplicity and keepsafe but what about everything else?
We don't want to release a program that we [b]know[/b] does not work for a significant proportion of people and which we cannot reasonably support. If we release another version of BootSkin, it will be more likely to implement a safer method of skin application than it will be to provide full-colour (though that ability may remain if people [i]really[/i] want it). I agree with you completly. I never faulted SD for not releasing it, I
Where was this promised? I was just asking. Where's the financial benefit to Stardock? While "promised" is a strong word (when does anyone in the software community ever promise anything anymore after years and years of dismal failures) it was announced, touted, and advertised to be avaialable real soon because it would be easy... As for financial incentive: originally it was going to be free, then it was said "oh, it is harder then w
But cool stuff keeps getting made. BootSkin continues to thrive. I haven't tried it on Windows Vista yet to see if it works but if not, it shouldn't be too hard to update it. Stardock actually had nearly finished a high-resolution, true color BootSkin that could support true animations but Microsoft hired the lead developer in the last weeks of coding. Unfortunately, since it was all written in assembly, it was abandoned. I think a perpetual beta