[quote]Not a loon thank you very much.No, and if you check the statement was not directed at you. You are just a stoned flower child.[/quote] No, not that either. I assumed it included me since you "taught a loon to search." And I'm sure that's all you think of me as.
[quote]Ahh the traditional response of Republicans who were called on their BS and are trying to weasel out of proving their claims.Better to teach a loon to search, than to give him a false link.See above for the correct link. Or are loony loopy luddite lefties capable of that? FYI - for the record, since you are new, I am not a Republican. I am conservative.[/quote] Not a loon thank you very much.
[quote]Mind providing actual evidence to prove this, since you are the one claiming it.Ok, go to the address bar, and type www.google.com.And do your own damn reading! It made front page on not only Fox, but CNN, but of course it was not on those left wing hate sites like retarded monkey, moron.org, or the puffington host.Get your head out of your butt, and do some work.[/quote] I've done my bit of looking into it, and found that it was like it was, just done by supporters. My point is
[quote]Wow, and that you did! Thanks for an insightful probe into an often sensitive and inflammed area.[/quote] I...nevermind. I'm not going to do anything but just laugh my behind off on this pun. Have a cookie, you made me chuckle. And E, I disagree with you. That's all I'm going to say on the topic.
[quote]Well there is the fact that it doesn't.Guess again WIse Fawn! His Texas Campaign was busted for it, and he did not deny it!Please continue! this is better than humor! It is a laugh riot! [/quote] Mind providing actual evidence to prove this, since you are the one claiming it. Otherwise I'm going to have to call bull on it. It's either another spun story, or not all the facts were gathered. I won't go so far as to say you're lying, you're better that as far as i know
[quote]For the first time ever, I beleive, I agree with you Ted. Wow, mark this day on the calendar.Woohoo!! :~D[/quote] I know, it's scary isn't it? :LOL:
[quote]Psst! The cause is that great big ball of fire in the sky. And there aint enough water on earth to put it out![/quote] As an acquaintance put it: We should just all piss on it. :p
[quote]They're mad as hell, dude. With the exception of the radicals, gay people just want to live and let live, but everywhere they go outside of their established gay enclaves, they get targetted for derision. I'm sure it gets really old.[/quote] Exactly! I agree, oh, and have a cookie. It's pretty hard to live life when everywhere you go (or darn near) you have a big target on you. Ironically (right term?), I hear the same claim from Christians (who judge and
[quote]Well, if this part of the Bible is not subject to interpreation (and not a result of people perceptions and thoughts at that time), then surely neither are every other teachings in it. Do you respect everything the Bible says (I doubt it, that just isn't possible these days), or do you choose the parts that you feel good about? One day you might find yourself at the other end of the stick, with people calling your way of living an abomination, telling you that you're a bad chris
This is an emotional issues, plain and simple. It will never ever be solved, why, because you're going to have one of the sides crying foul if the other is "winning." It all comes down to personal ethics/morals. Personal is the operative word. Same thing with the other emotional issues.
Uhh, help anyone? Now I realize I can't post at all. I used to be able to anyway. Would someone help me, please?
No response ID?
Seeing as one of the two things I'm looking into getting my Bachelor's or Masters in is Journalsim, I figured I would respond. The way I see it, journalism has become just another commercial deal. Long gone are the days of honest, credible, and thorough journalism. Long gone are the journalist who reports objectively, effectively, and gets the whole story. I remember reading something once, that mentioned that modern reporting (they theorized) began around the time of Hearst, about the
Meant "you" as in general, not necessarily you specifically DrG.
[quote]Here's the problem with the blind man and the elephant. How do you know he has not? This is but one article. Even the MSM does not write novels on all candidates at once, they pick one and do an expose (or a hatchet job) and then write a second, third, fourth and on and on to bring out their biases on the others. Yet you expect a blog to be comprehensive on the election process? Please, learn the difference. Go rant on the NY Times pages about how they cant seem to find the political p
[quote]I'm willing to pay attention to global warming...I won't dismiss it outright and I won't preach it as God's honest truth. I know polar ice caps have been melting, article wildlife has been suffereing...so something is getting warmer somewhere along the line. Whether it's a global warming phenomenon remains to be seen...but I've an open mind about it.[/quote] Precisely. Also, why not take care of the enviroment anyway?
My bad, it's an association fallacy I believe.
Hmmm, I actually think he's going the right way. Not the best execution, but the intention is good. Still, it makes me wonder. Wouldn't it be controlling (softly) what people do and don't do? Meh, I'll have to think about it.
Carter indeed wasn't very productive, and there were things he did that were not...positive, but yeah, I agree. I don't get why people associate his presidency with what he does now, they're separate things.
And your point is? Trying to put meaning into the similarities really sounds like a straw man fallacy to me. All candidates have people who volunteer their time who are questionable or otherwise murky.
[quote]Please note the legitimate; I'm not advocating whole sale executions of them, either. I'm simply saying that their own acts have removed them from the "precious" category. In essance, I'm ranting because that phrase is yet another of a million over simplifications that drive me insane.[/quote] Think about this: "Why do we kill people who kill people to show people that killing people is wrong?" To me, to kill someone who has killed another, is just as w
Actually, I don't care what you call her, because we're not together anymore. Long story, and you wouldn't care to listen anyway. Secondly, I posted this almost three months ago, and you're just now checking it out? Did you just happen to feel like taking a trip down memory lane and bash me? Cause woman, it doesn't work anymore. At one time I would've agreed with you, but I know I'm better than what you and some of the other assholes here say. Oh sure, I made mistakes, I know
Hey, I tried all of that, and then went to post something here, and....nothing, it wont post. Is it cause of my status as a "visitor"? j/w
[quote] Sometimes I think people try to get through life clean. Keeping endless lists of the wrongs perpetrated against them, but ignoring or refusing to acknowledge the damage they've done. Refusing to acknowledge the consequences of their actions which usually causes others to continually remind them. It's a vicious cycle. We're all human, not one of us is perfect. We hurt each other, we
[quote]I make words with my keyboard.[/quote] Reminds me of Jabberwocky, by Lewis Carroll. [quote]I wipe my own a$$.[/quote] With $$$ no less. :p
JoeUser Forums
Stardock Forums