Photoshop is the best, but it needs maybe a life time for been able to have full control on it. But, don't be afraid about it, 'cause knowing the 20% you will be able to do miracles
starone hi! Davad70 has right, it is skinnable, unless you are refering to something else, it is not very clear you know. Old Crab, Classic or XP makes no difference, if you are using WindowBlinds skins.
Listen to davad70 migellito I will give you just one example, (I have too many, I could write all day). My last skin "Omega" was having Peer Rating 10 with 4 rates and suddenly it went down to 5, what do you think that has happen? You know what it needs to fall down from 10 to 5? (By the way, this skin is almost perfect technically). After all, I believe, it is still a beautiful site,
What? Your days in Australia are having only 24 hours???? Oh, this is unfair for you guys!
Listen to Davad70 Any way, I don't believe that the ratings are having any effect on downloads and the bandwidth in general, the only effect that they have, are on authors feelings, but who cares...
Hi Pat I must admit that with all that you have mention above, will be an improvement of the system rating, specially with what concerns the old ratings Still there is no way for the authors to avoid the malicious rates; I hope that someone will find some way for that, forasmuch as it looks, the opinions f
Hi Dave It happens to me too, some days ago, with my skin "omega", but it fixed by T-Man. Why don't you try to inform him about your problem?
I thought that "argument" and "discussion" were synonyms, aren't they, Jafo? I like your suit and the tie specially!
I am still wondering, why is it so difficult to improve this System Rating ??? Why we have to go on this argument on and on ? What is happening?
jcg, listen to TheGreenReaper
Hmmm, interesting point of view Laurence!
Johanne, (Hi! ) Of course I am serius,in fact I am always serius and I know what Brad thinks about ratings, I have all ready said it, in my previous threads. But, I also know that he said something about "close minded people that they just want their views to be accepted as fact" and I can't believe that he is one of them, thats why I am still trying.
So, migellito, you are one of them, hmmmm (j/k) If you read carefully all my threads, you will find out that I never said anything about removing the system rating, because I know that Brad insist in this, I only said IMPROVE IT! Also, it has nothing to do with the bandwidth, because almost all the people are downloading "by date" or by "downloads" and very rarely "by rating".
A summary of the opinions briefly. paxx says: get rid of them, they are useless migellito says: not pay attention to the rating treetog says: I don´t give a crap about ratings feline says: i can see the point in the ratings c242 says: ...the rating is still anonymous. Theres no use for that jcg says: not accept ratings that are not accompanied by a comment WiseOldMan says: I agree. There needs to be some sort of accountability
You can see it now and it is no 2 in "downloads today". Congratulations!
It is because someone have put a very low rating in your work. I am going to fix this problem now.
In this thread look the opinion of the authors about ratings, briefly. paxx says: get rid of them, they are useless migellito says: not pay attention to the rating treetog says: I don´t give a crap about ratings feline says: i can see the point in the ratings c242 says: ...the rating is still anonymous. Theres no use for that jcg says: not accept ratings that are not accompanied by a comment WiseOldMan says: I agree. There needs to
Jafo, About your comment and the wallpapers,in particular, there are 3 facts: 1. The quality is up to moderators of WinCustomize, isn't it? Therefore, it has nothing to do with the rating system. 2. How can any one forse the people for rating more? After all this period of time, we know well, that only very few people are rating. 3. The 99% of the people are downloading, "by date", so this fact also has nothing to do with the rating system again.
We have seen many threads about this subject. The results of all those threads were always the same. The majority of the active members of our community, they don't like the ratings as they are now or they don't want the ratings at all. I know that Brad insist in this rating system. I know also that it is his site. I am wondering why all those arguments, about the rating system, are not having any effect. Do you remember who wrote
I am in
The peer rating is not representative in the most works. I agree with feline, that "with only 2 values entered, the score isn’t that representative". In the other hand, the most of the works are having no ratings at all! paxx, I can see your point, but if "...lot of people would give high ratings just to make themselves look like nice guys", it never hurt anyone, the bad ratings are those that are hurting authors and making them want to stop working. The only reason, that
But this has nothing to do with my thread Brad! I never said to remove the system rating! I just said that is good to improve it, 'cause it has some weakness. The word Contributer is not equal with the word Saint, if you know what I mean.
Have you thought to make some improvements for the system rating in the version 2 of WinCustomize? What is the use of it, if the authors doesn't know why they get 10 from someone and after 1 from someone else for the same work and in the same day? As the comments are not anonymous why the ratings must be anonymous and without a small comment giving the reason of the rate? I think that the rating system is the only black point in WinCustomize and it has to be fixed. So, much work from
AJCrowley, you said "...but where there's a will, there will always be a way" O, yes, you are right, this is true, but for both sides
WinCustomize Forums