Here I will like to have your opinion on Vista compression… Is this really better??? What that changes it? I carried out a small personal experience under Vista I have to create an icon under photoshop (256+256), then I safeguard it in ico without Vista compression. Then I open Axiaelis Iconworkshop and adds all the formats xp without compression in "ico 01" I then record with same the icon a "ico 2" compressed in Vista on size 256 At first sight no difference … I
Zouly
it is necessary to look in the options of personalization click right on the desk and also in the general options in the control panel my memory has;)
And well I am in this case, on standby of a icon packager compatible Vista 64 to buy it because I have a package on standby… moreover I will like to know if all the programs of object desktop 2008 will be compatible Windows Vista 64 bit before buying it (its exit has obviously;) ) I hope to have reponces thank you
indeed, I am into 64 bit under Vista with a icon package of finished and a large wall in front of me…. That paralise I supose much of anybody… Is there news for this compatibility between Iconpackager and vista64??
Can nobody answer me at least for icon packager compatible Windows Vista 64??
hello:) Can you answer me please? Is there a version of icon packager compatible Windows Vista 64? or a date of planned for its exit Is what all the programs of Object Desktop are compatible with Windows Vista 64 bit? and I will like to know if it on there a aproximative date for the exit of Object Desktop 2008 thank you very much
thank you for your information there is indeed a difference between compression (rar...) and of the files zip
hello I have the same problem for upload icon files I use format JPG for the skin but that do not please function "Your skin has failed to upload. The skin file you are attempting to upload is not valid. Hint: Check the file extension. When uploading a new skin, your Skin file must also be submitted." Can you help me please