Your politics of course are whack job, Sigh. And here I present a nice, point by point argument and get a Rush Limbaugh response, oh well. If three tretise on this subject don't make a dent, 300 more won't either. As for oil, I am no economist. But I know this: it is in W's interest (and the lobbyists who support him) to keep price up. He is strangely silent on the issue and has shown no leadership. It's bad when Venezuela can out manuev
joe-pro-photographer
(I mean seriously, you're hyped up about Plame? That just screams ideologue to me). Me, no. But I couldn't resist putting her in. Frankly, I don't care at all about Plame. But when listing my favorite Bush faux pa's, it's a political foot in mouth and fun to torment with. Your reasons are just more fodder about the Great job Bush is doing. He truely is a stellar leader. I think I'll launch a line of W trading cards. <img src="http://image
When George and Laura Bush decide to weigh in on the Demoncratic race, my thoughts tend to race. The other day, Laura Bush promoted a key reason for Clinton's White House run, saying her predecessor's experience as first lady would be "very helpful" in the Oval Office. Hmmm. Bush agreed with her. Uh Oh. I've also heard Newt Gingrich speak extensively a
Thanks, and yes, totally accidentally. I wish the stardock guy would move it as I can't. M
Good, it was a snaffu (AMAZINGLY) that put it here to begin with. I originally put it in Politics, and it got posted in Computing. Go figure. Move it, I would if I could. M
Thanks for the advice, but I'm not quite done with all I have to say on the subject of GW. I think my last post is the last for a while: Why W is the best president ever. On that subject, anyway. I think next I want to explore each candidate, republican and democrat. My partner is OUT OF THE HOSPITAL and doing really well, thanks for asking. A huge weight has been lifted off my shoulder. Very perceptive, Daniel. The article disappeared for a while and then popped back up.
I repent! I am on my knees! (Mind out of the gutter). I have been convinced. I see the light! I have sinned! Forgive me, please, forgive me! Bush is a great man. He is the finest example of a leader I've ever seen. Let's start from the start, even before W was elected. He knew he was incompetent on foreign policy, so he enlisted the he
* The preceding is tongue and cheek and is not to be taken seriously. the sad thing is, you had to tell everyone. Do you think Troy actually read any of this thread? Troy, what is it about GW that you think is great? What makes him a great man, a great leader? Tell us. E N L I G H T E N U S
Bush haters regurgitating hate for Bush. BOORING! We've heard it all before! Idiots! BOORING!!!! Truely insightful. As for the link, I couldn't see it either. Perhaps the joe user management already got it. If I'd of realized it was a WP link, it would have gone if I could do anything aboutit.
If someone could remove the link in post # 118 that would be special. I'm sorry, I don't believe in removing any response. Even though some believe UFO's will be the key to solving global warming, I think it's important to let everyone voice their view. Tell me why you think the link should be removed
"And tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of Iraq: Your enemy is not surrounding your country -- your enemy is ruling your country. (Applause.) And the day he and his regime are removed from power will be the day of your liberation. (Applause.) State of the Union Address, 2003 Granted, it wasn't mentioned i
In my reply #73 what I was attempting to convey is that with the current mind set of our Governments and Political leaders we may change the person but we won't change their actions or the outcome. Jafo makes a reference to "Every generation needs its Vietnam". If the statement was made I'm thinking that possibly it was made thin
The intel was good for them and their campaign, the selfish little pricks. A clever response! But I think now that the facts are on the table even they would say the intel was piss poor. Still, a clever response. Gives me an idea for my next posting....
Still waiting on that name. One person who says the intel was good and we should have used wmds as a justification for war. One person. I got it! I know one. Rush Limbaugh. Woops, Nope. Crap.
What happens on a daily basis that the public is never made aware of isvoluminous. I have seen details of things that if known would keep most people from sleeping at night. There are reasons for this - and it is not to make sure the poll numbers are rising for the party in power at least not at the top. <B
Far as Bush is concerned I don't blame HIM for Iraq since almost everyone was behind him at first(including YOUR Senators and Congressmen). I blame him for having mediocre planning and starting the job without a well prepared exit strategy. I can't speak to Carter with authority. I haven't researched h
Playing on the title of the post, if Bush is Bad then it stands to reason that the people who allowed him to be the President are equally as bad. I know, no one ever wants to hear that kind of talk. How ever you slice the pie that means the rest of the voting eligible people in the US. Our system of checks and balances fails only
Wow, what a great thread. Thank you everyone for weighing in. I don't think blame extends to the voters, at least that's not where I put it. But even as I write that, I do blame the voters. Blame, but understand. Don't get me wrong, I was surprised Bush was reelected. And that's a whole 'nother thread on whether the American people were duped -- by the spinners and the media and the political process. I blame the media more than t
I've read suggest Rumsfeld's approach, more tactical, was a problem i agree wuth this Good, god, call a news conference. I'm going to go drinkin' now daniel (not really, but family is getting nuts with me being on the computer.) Have a good thanksgiving and we'll debate again soon. Thanks for all your thoughts; I appreciate them and respect you tremendously. m
Thank you. I gotta run, too I'm gettin' in trouble with the family. Peace. M
all this means is you will not accept any body. and there is one other group that we are forgetting the Spanish had the same Intel and their own. Comeon. That's a cop out. You can come up with someone. Come on, try. Don't go overseas. I don't know anything about Spanish Intel. Stick with AMERICAN, be a patriot. One little name, and a quote if you got it. Just one. Take some time, research it. I gotta go be with my family, I'm
Well everyone I must run - thank you for the brisk discussion - Joe - hang in there - you and all the others have a right to your opinions and should continue to voice them - I for one fought for our right to do so, without hesitation, so do me a favor and use it as well as your right to vote when the time comes. I so wish there
You assume I am huffy and I am not. You did not however answer my question. I thought I did. You articulate the position of the oil industry very well. I've worked photographing for them on Capitol Hill, so I know their positions. I'm not saying that's bad or wrong, just that it is their position wor
Ranger, I don't think we are really that far off, which probably does surprise you. But most military people I've read suggest Rumsfeld's approach, more tactical, was a problem over Powell's approach, hit the f****ks hard. I'm not saying an intel case needs to be air tight, though I did use those words. But, I think given the evidence, it should have been WAY WAY BETTER than what it was. To have a list of hundreds of targets you can't even prio
you know what i find interesting is when they attack bush and when you bring up that the other side did the same thing. it becomes we are not talking about them we are talking about bush. I'm sorry, Daniel, I'm just not following you. Can you please elaborate?