mickeko

mickeko

Joined Member # 3307327
6 Posts 311 Replies 25,140 Reputation

Unfortunately most people don't appreciate long and tedious grinds, they don't like hard games either. So, they make a hard game, get subscribers up to the point where the only people interested in playing the game already are. The only way to get more subscribers is to make the game easier... The problem is that game companies don't see a fixed amount of subscribers as profit. If the amount of subscribers is not continuously *increasing*, the game is failing. It's like a world where

142 Replies 394,646 Views

[quote who="smv1978" reply="16" id="2065628"]running 7 x64 on my laptop, only thing that's broke is my wireless button uses 200 MB less ram while idling than vista. wtg microsoft(take that how you want to ) [/quote] Why does idle memory usage matter? I don't care if the OS use every single bit of available memory when idle, as long as my software has access to as much as possible of that when needed. And that's really not easily measurab

81 Replies 246,889 Views

[quote who="starkers" reply="18" id="2065330"] Mikeko, the company you worked for may just have gotten a bad batch, as can sometimes happen with any product and is just one of those things, but my sister and others I know have gotten several years good service from Hitachi HDD's [/quote] >LINK - There.... :D Not just a bad batch in that case. :P

28 Replies 14,885 Views

[quote who="Jafo" reply="16" id="2065174"] we noted that drive failure rate went down do about 5 each month instead... What on earth do you do with your computers? [/quote] [e digicons]:grin:[/e] Well, there was still a huge lot of deskstars around to fail, I would think the company I worked for got down to the more normal failure rates after getting rid of even more or those evil ones. I didn't stay long enough to see a month go by without a single harddrive f

28 Replies 14,885 Views

[quote who="gambitraven" reply="12" id="2064916"] and becouse of your reaction I now feel even more of a need to bad mouth wow. [/quote] Go ahead, in the end you may actually seem young enough to play the "kids game" you claim that wow is. :D

142 Replies 394,646 Views

Fences is known to have trouble with some other apps hooking into the desktop, some vista, more on XP. Running fences on a dream cause minor problems on vista, and doesn't work at all for people on XP, and I've seen posts about a bunch of other software too. Check the official fences forum for those reports.

85 Replies 182,389 Views

Obviously most drives work well for years, even those with a bad reputation. I've seen a HUGE lot of broken deskstars at work (a 600 computer company) where most computers worked fine (pretty much all the computers had deskstars, as hardware was standardized), there was a continuous stream of harddrive failures though, something like 5 each week or so... Drives that decided to just die at some point... We started switching the drives to western digital (which was seen as reliable drives at th

28 Replies 14,885 Views

[quote who="gambitraven" reply="7" id="2064824"] wow is a cartoon and is for kids [/quote] Just because it's a cartoon doesn't mean it's bad. And it's definetely not "for kids"... I know ALOT of people who play it, and they are ALL 25+, so your remark is just about as significant as a fart in deep space. The truth is simply that you don't like it, and there's nothing wrong with that, I just don't understand the reason why people feel they need to bash on things they don't li

142 Replies 394,646 Views

I wouldn't trust a deskstar to host my recycle bin... As you've noticed, they are majorly unreliable. Most harddrives tend to start sounding funny, and cause minor issues before failing... Deskstars just die, they don't have the nickname deathstars for nothing. Experience tells me you're out of luck when it comes to getting the data out of the drives yourself. Your case *may* be different though, it's hard to tell, as we don't have physical access to check your stuff.

28 Replies 14,885 Views

I've never had that bad connection, so it's probably something that is outside stardock that cause it. On a slow day pageloads take ~20 seconds to load for me, which is slow enough for me to complain... Going over 5 minutes for a page is ridiculous, but as I've *never* seen that, I think it's an indication that those pageloads are not caused by stardock servers.

332 Replies 494,943 Views