Hmmm... the only problem I foresee with Flagship bonuses is that, that ship will now be a MUCH bigger target for enemy ships, and therefore need uber support to stay alive late-game battles, but that still would be better than the "Flagships" we have now. Koda0 (^)
Banned for making fun of MY avatar when YOU should be talking. Koda0 (^) P.S. Don't make fun of this fish, he died about a week ago[e digicons]X([/e]
Sins Forums
See, but here's what I'm saying: Each unit has it's own unique strengths and weaknesses. However, the units that are buffed up or nerfed are, more often than not, the ones most commonly used as the backbone of your fleet. Not that I'm saying that LRF's vs. Carriers is currently fair (with the new changes Blair posted above, the tables will be more even, though) it's just that other "flaws" in the , as I like to call it, "Rock, Paper, Scissors, Dynamite", scenario will
Banned because periods is a funny word Koda0 (^)
Muchas, Muchas gracias mi (amigo, amiga?)!![e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons]:grin:[/e] Karma 4 U! Thx again, Koda0 (^)
Both of you are banned for assuming there are rules at all. Also, Annatar, YOU are banned for finding my only loophole![e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] BUT, I can't give you Karma, you already have THE MOST ON THE ENTIRE FORUM![e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons]>_>[/e] [e digicons]:hugme:[/e] [e digicons]X([/e] Koda0 (^)
The only problem with this (that the developers will not make it happen) is that by following a single trade ship, you could, effectively, scout where enemy borders are. Other than that, great idea[e digicons]^_^[/e] Koda0 (^)
When you say that, do you mean to copy the file and e-mail it, or to just write down the minidumps name in the e-mail and then mail it to Ironclad? Thx- Koda0 (^) (When I say name, I mean like, C:\Users\BlahBlah\AppData\Etc.etc.
Okay, recently here, my comp. is really... aggravating. I'm getting to the point where every week or so I'll have to un, and then re-install Sins: Entrenchment and Vanilla just to play the game since it minidumps so much. Right now, it minidumps before the Ironclad logo+animation shows up. Any advice to use before the next update comes along? (Cannot wait that long to sin again[e digicons]:bebi:[/e] ) Koda0 (^)
Sins Forums
[e digicons]:P[/e] I'd have to agree with EadTaes here. The only REAL problem is that, with current carriers, they are both unable to outrun LRF's AND they have no defensive/offensive power once flak is brought into the equation, AND they can't (at least, TEC and Vasari can't) compile the antimatter to re-build their strikecraft, or build them fast enough. BUT, I have to disagree on one crucial point... not very many players will send ONLY carriers into a system. Most of the
Banned for banning people who also banned other people, therefore EVERYBODY IS BANNED!!! Koda0 (^) P.S. Banned for posting after me, to ban me, for banning other people, being a hypocrite, posting in this forum, typing in all capital letters, using more than one exclamation mark, for signing my name and my insignia, for having an insignia, for not using smilies, for trying not to be banned, for making a list of things not to ban me by, banning mys
Interesting, lots of lost ideas here... especially liking, well I can't really specify, they're all good ideas, but it might be hard to follow the current Sins line and incorporate some ideas. I think that Super Caps. would be more interesting, and definetly be worth Cap. ships uber long build time, experience gathering time, and high cost. (Capital Carriers need a buff the most I think, as they're often outshadowed by their cruiser cousins{even if Embargo is badass}) Moons, a
How very sexist... but I'm not a girl, I can't play online (stupid internet is T o o s l o w) and I don't personally know any who do... so if I had to guess, a few, closely knitted clans are girls, and you'd be hard-pressed to find them. Koda0 (^)
Banned for yet ANOTHER paradox... looking back, this game gets rather repetitive, don't ya think? Koda0 (^)
Hahaha.... Banned for outshining ALL other bans in the forum. (not like, BURN-wise, but involuntary-grin wise) Karma!![e digicons]:grin:[/e] Koda0 (^) EDIT: Oh no, now I feel outdone by your 7+ Karma...[e digicons]X([/e]
With MB, if you DO have a target cap, it should be 40, or close to it. Also, with Carriers, what they could do is, instead of beefing up carriers and their respective counter-ships... beef up the strikecraft they carry. Like , increase the damage from each ship by about 33%, and increase hull strength (not Advent) by about 15% (Advent don't really need such help, but this SHOULD make it even, given that Advent essentially OWN the "sky" abouve my fleet, regardless of carrier/carrie
If the 3rd one WAS a campaign, somewhere along the line (a.k.a. the 2nd one) we'd (hopefully, anyway) learn of the Vasari's nemesis... YAY![e digicons]:rofl:[/e] Also, you could be able to build "colonies" in empty regions of space, but I don't think (not to be a dreamcrusher) that'll happen in the near- not modded future (as for mods, that's a marvelous idea, try DANMAN once he has a break from 7 Deadly Sins) Now that Entrenchment is out, and it's HIGHLY expected that the new
Hmmm... Not to ruin the fun, but if LRM spam is too strong to properly use carriers, spam on support and heavy cruisers... wouldn't that work?[e digicons]>_>[/e] Koda0(^) EDIT: In the early game, you probably could counter LRM spam with LRM spam... but that kinda ruins the fun, doesn't it?[e digicons]^_^'[/e]
Banned for hypocrisy (that means doing something you tell others not to do[e digicons]:D[/e] ) Koda0 (^) EDIT: Parents of all kinds are masters of this, so if you are a parent, I don't blame you[e digicons]:grin:[/e] [e digicons]:P[/e]
Banned for continuing the count that I unintentionally continued. Also, banned for being the rapist of this post (seriously, You BAN almost every other post...creeper much?) Koda0 (^)
Wow, uh... banned for being WAY ignorant of that last post. Also, banned for saying,"butt fancier" more than once on a single page... that's kinda creepy.[e digicons]X|[/e] Koda0 (^)
Banned for assuming America's agricultural economy will EVER fail (America feeds some 2+ Billion people[e digicons]:grin:[/e] ) But, Banned for never signing your name at the end of a post.[e digicons]:ninja:[/e] Koda0 (^) EDIT: It's not just a caret, the WHOLE thing is the image[e digicons];P[/e]
Banned for being in the Future Farmers of America(lol) Koda0 (^)
I don't agree that damage is instant upon firing, if you've ever watched a TEC Ogrov Torpedo Cruiser's missiles, and kept tabs on the targets health, the tagets health doesn't go down until the missiles hit it, same with TEC bombers, LRM's, etc. Also, MB DOES NOT NEED NERFED. If it does get nerfed, please also nerf Guardians, Aeria's, the Vulkoras Desolator's Disintegrate power, and Kostura's.. because their all essentially the same. Also, I think that Cap. Carriers are
There, changed the title... also, (now that we've stopped complaining about the title) if anyone wants to continue this post, do it here https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/354176 Koda0 (^)