[quote who="Zeta1127" reply="238" id="2936154"]Well, she is jumping to warp which is probably why she looks elongated, because I know for a fact the nacelles are too round among numerous other characteristics for her to be a Sovereign-class. Please go here and here to see what I talking about.[/quote] I'm pretty sure Sins can't handle dynamic mesh deformation (a la ST warp-speed elongation). [quote who="harpo99999" reply="239" id="2936179"]the top one looks more like a
[quote who="Oatesy03" reply="893" id="2936202"]Seems Whiskey's been doing some counter-stalking; he now knows the exact physical dimensions of Storm.[/quote] No; it's just there's so much (relative) crap under my bed that I wouldn't fit, and I'm about 5'4"/5'4.5". And skinny. And I was going to put something about my looks and the liking the ladies have for me but decided not to.
[quote who="Swiss Knight" reply="144" id="2936088"]now I get to stop making jokes here because I can't rely on you people to not act retarded. Have some screenshots you whores. Reduced 83% Original 684 x 410 Reduced 83% Original 683 x 409 Reduced 83% Original 684 x 410 [/quote] I object to the
[quote who="Zeta1127" reply="236" id="2936071"]I assure you that the first one is a Galaxy-class and the last one is an Ambassador-class.[/quote] I dunno about the top one; looks more like a Sovereign to me, what with the elongated saucer and the more in-line lower hull.
[quote who="Theophantus" reply="233" id="2936022"]Couple more in game screenshots Last one [/quote] Pretty nice; not sure what the top one is, but I'm pretty sure that the last one is what, an Ambassador ?
[quote who="Theophantus" reply="231" id="2935988"]Hello Whiskey, Are you impressed? You know when i started this post i hadn't got a clue about modding. "Why did the Sovereign successfully destroy a Venator when there were two pounding on it? Venators formed the mainline combat warship of the Republic, and had heavy guns to rival the Imperial-I class SDs." Remember its all balanced mainly with the stock ships and abilities, apart from a few tweeks
[quote quoting="post"] Hi. I've noticed that docking my squadrons does a great deal in reducing the lag, so would it be possible to have a 3rd setting for squadrons that launches them only if enemys are in or approaching the gravity well ? [/quote] It's already present. It's called "micro". /wryness.
[quote who="Theophantus" reply="227" id="2935972"] First Image of in game Screenshot. Sovereign Vs Venators. First Venator destroyed with all hands. [/quote] I'm curious on two things: 1) How did you scale the Sovereign -class to be smaller than the Venators ? (which it is, BTW. +1 for good scaling) 2) Why did the Sovereign successfully destroy a Venator  
[quote who="Mystikmind" reply="180" id="2934842"]That is just as ridiculous as Dr who coming back into existence simply because Amy Pond remembered him![/quote] Not really. The only reason you really need to know where something is is because you want to go there. Using an "arbitrary" point that is selected for any reason (ranging from convenience to shits'n'giggles) can be used to define another objects position. Ideally, you actually use a coordinat
[quote who="LightofAbraxas" reply="169" id="2934800"]To continue with my philosophy of only addressing posters that are willing to engage at a more than superficial level: Also, what about the dinosaurs? If the Bible had said: "You won't believe this right away, but, one day you will discover that before I tried creating Man, I messed around with giant lizards. You'll find their bones eventually," then I wouldn't have any problem with believing. It's some
[quote who="LightofAbraxas" reply="165" id="2934783"]First, fantastic, you are a man after my own my own heart. But... a couple things I'd like to say. 1) What do you think about the arguement that might suggest that: what you have said presupposes a Creator and then looks for clues to support that idea? 2) Who is to say that life would be impossible (although possibly very different) if the Universe's fundamental values took different values? 3) What is to be sa
[quote who="ElanaAhova" reply="157" id="2934749"]There IS a movie version of the book Fahrenheit 451....[/quote] This has already been noted and has been dismissed as irrelevance to the topic at hand, due primarily to my (initially) mistaking this thread as discussing the book Fahrenheit 451 and the terribadness (or so I've heard) of the movie. [quote who="ElanaAhova" reply="158" id="2934750"]if i refered to the wrong person / post, I (conditionally) apologize.&nb
[quote who="SivCorp" reply="147" id="2934705"]And don't try Whiskey. It isn't worth it. If people won't apply the same standards to the Bible as other ancient texts, that is their problem. You will not win that argument, because people are close minded to anything that resembles religion, God, or anything that doesn't center around them.[/quote] Oh, I'm not going to try. I'm simply submitting my opinion. [quote who="BoobzTwo" reply="14
[quote who="myfist0" reply="137" id="2934616"]I have never read the bible but I can tell you it's full of lies.[/quote] The technical term for this statement is "blasphemy". The technical term for someone who makes this statement is "blasphemer". That is all.
[quote who="OMG_pacov" reply="13" id="2934551"]Again - if all you are trying to do is be able to install this on 2 computers, the registration suggestion should sort you if SD is willing to assist. If ranting about illegal this and that is your goal... well then... winner. Or you could just attempt to get whatever your problem is resolved by a transfer of the registration - that should enable 1 account to play trinity and the other to play sins/entrenchment. That is what you
[quote who="ElanaAhova" reply="127" id="2934287"]wiskey144 you are presenting an ad homonim argument which is, by definition, a logical falacy. Truth is truth, no matter WHO states it. False is false, no matter who states it. The fact that a person does not totally, 100% ACT according the the truth they espouse does NOT invalidate what they state. Neither does someones heroic, super moral, or popular lifestyle / committment to "truth, justice,and the
[quote who="BoobzTwo" reply="112" id="2933971"]Whiskey144 – Now I understand this troll business, thanks for the update though. I knew there was little intelligence behind this nonsense and now I understand why … just like a child. I thought I was the troll, hehehe so have fun in your excursion into stupidity, it's where you belong.[/quote] [quote who="BoobzTwo" reply="115" id="2933977"]Don't you consider yourself intelligent ...[/quote] These two quo
[quote who="wbino" reply="106" id="2933944"]Whiskeys two favorite words: prove and idiot. Forget it, I changed my mind I offered an olive branch, and your still a dick.[/quote] I'm not a "dick", I'm a "troll". There's a very big difference. A "dick" is unreasonable for the purpose of being unreasonable. A "troll" is unreasonable for the purpose of self-amusement. [quote who="BoobzTwo" reply="108" id="2933953"]Whiskey144 - Now I understand this nonsense. Your
[quote who="wbino" reply="104" id="2933913"]Whiskey....you just called me an idiot, when all I was trying to do was to bring a little sarcastic humor in to the conversation. An olive branch even....making fun of the obvious Elemental getting it to run problems. Read that post again and I will wait for your apology. [/quote] I would apologize, since you've stated that your post was made in jest. But that last sentence reeks of pomposity, and so I will wait until yo
[quote who="BoobzTwo" reply="98" id="2933665"]I am sure you could if you tried. I can easily prove most of your facts are in error … hum, did you give any facts at all?[/quote] 1. The burden of proof is on you , you naffing idiot. YOU made the claim that you consider Moore's film to be factual, whilst I disputed that. Thus, you must provide the proof that Moore's film is indeed factually valid. 2. I have presented no facts, bec
[quote who="wbino" reply="88" id="2933619"]woah...whiskey...and psychoak twins separated at birth! The fact that those on the right side of the political spectrum can watch Fox news on a daily basis and not care, or be able to tell the whole channel is bs is telling. These people don't want facts, they just want to be stroked into thinking they are normal to be selfish fools.[/quote] First off, I barely even know psychoak. Secondly, I consider the US to be
Sins Forums