Honestly, even if you're not going to be going SLi just yet you should probably consider getting a new video card simply because AGP is a dead technology at this point. If you buy a new mobo with AGP graphics you're only prolonging the amount of time you'll have to wait until you can upgrade your graphics card. All of the new cards are PCIEx and I hardly ever see video cards that are AGP. I personally have the NVidia 7950GX2 which is a single card SLi solution and I'm not really considering the
Kevin_C
but I would care about re-buying a license Absolutely!! If that is the case I would have to buy a copy a week at times and that ain't happening! Here's hoping all of this turns out to be nothing more than the same old players trying to create a problem where one doesn't exist..
but you are stuck with that upgraded computer forever, unless you buy a new license. Not true. From what I've read on various sites the media is having a great time blowing this all out of proportion just like they did before XP came out. With the retail version you can transfer it to a new device once. The definition of new device is st
Technically, it's not beta. It's a release candidate so it's further along that a beta but still not necessarily ready for general consumption..
I figured you knew, but better to be safe than sorry I always say!
jelvis, One thing to keep in mind if you are new to RAID and RAID 0 in particular. Make sure you keep backups of ALL your important data. With a RAID 0 array any disk issues will result in the loss of ALL of your data on BOTH disks. There's no way to get the data back unless you are willing to spend the money to send it for professional recovery. Just something to keep in mind!!
The wallpaper used in this bootskin is City at Night II from the digital blasphemy members gallery. Aside from the fact that there's no permission included the watermark that Ryan puts on ALL of his walls has been removed. This is directly from the copyright page on the digitalblasphemy free site: Under no condition will I allow any of my hi-res images to be posted without the URL watermark in the lower right corner. I'd post a link to the source but it's on the pay site and wi
so about a bug per dollar? Does this mean we should be thankful it doesn't cost more?!? <img src="http://images.stardock.com/wc/
only 500 bugs. Just a little friendly word to those who think this is a lot. The version of XP you're using probably has far more than 500 bugs. When you take into consideration that Windows has MILLIONS of lines of code, 500 bugs is a pittance, and keep in mind there are large parts of Vista that wer
Aimzzz, No prob, price is important but only once you really have an idea what you want to go for. It looks like Fuzzy has suggested some great components that will fit in your budget and should server you very well.. Corky_O, If you're looking for a good 2.1 system look at Klipsch I'm currently running these and th
Instead of just posting a list of components and guessing what your price range is I'll save myself some time and just ask. So, what are you looking to spend? The suggestions made here already are good but without an idea of what you are looking to spend it's hard to try and optimize the "bang for your buck". Here are some general guidelines I tend to give to friends and family members who are looking to upgrade. Processor: AMD is of course a good choice and the new AM2 socket will give
PM'ing definitely, new suites definitely (or at the very least update the existing ones to the latest application features). It might be nice if skins could be tagged or associated with a particular version for apps like WB and IP since as features evolve skins become obsolete if they aren't updated. With this tagging we could set our preferences to only show us skins that were made version 4+ or 5, etc. Anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing how things
and 870gig of drives Bah!! 4 X 320GB SATA II = 1.28 TB RAID 0. That's my file server, my main PC has 2 X 250 GB SATA II. Gots to have lots of space for all my SD apps and skins!! <img src="http://images.stardock.com/wc/smiles/BigSmile.gif" border=0 ALI
The page's title explains what sort of people these are, who would go to such lengths: Holy crap, you stole that right out of my mouth!! The same people who think it's cool to re-compile their kernel to install graphics drivers, that's who!! However, I want to admit I'm using this as my wallpaper at work.. I think it's partially to tick
Is there an AOL folder in Program Files? If not, it may not actually be installed. I know that sometimes when you click on the "Try AOL" icon on the desktop it actually installs the program. You may be able to just remove the entry from the Add-Remove programs list from the registry and then delete all the shortcuts that are all over the place. As far as the "Restore partition" that's the computer makers way to save a few bucks at the expense of the customer. If they put the software on
Seems like common sense to me. If only this statement were true for everyone! I too feel that making the upgrade to IE7 automatic is a good thing but you can't discount the haters out there. MS can't win for losing, they're damned if they do and damned if they don't as I fear it always will be... <im
Even if nobody had a choice, and we were all forced to install IE7, what's the big deal? You don't want a more secure browser with a bunch of new features? In theory Adamness the situation could deifinitely be far worse but there are people out there who use anything and everything to try and prove t
but now you tell me that they will want me to update or else.. Of course you could have chosen to read the 4 comments posted above yours in which the posters clearly state that there will indeed be an option as to whether or not the update is installed. However, as Koasati stated there will undoubtedl
If you would, point out where Mr. Norvig used the words "general user" I would, but as Corky_O stated there is no direct quote attributing the statement to either of the Google execs. However, the author of the article states that Norvig later clarified his statement, and stated that it was not Berners-Lee or his group that was incompetent but th
rather the incompetent web designers that don't know how to use HTML that their engine has to deal with I did read the article and I don't think he was referring only to the Webmasters. Yes, he mentions webmasters who can't write HTML, or configure a server, but in referring to the *general user* as incompetent he isn't speaking only of Webmaster
Perhaps, but I still consider it a poor choice of words at best, and insulting at worst.
[quote]"'What I get a lot is: "Why are you against the Semantic Web?" I am not against the Semantic Web. But from Google's point of view, there are a few things you need to overcome, incompetence being the first,' Norvig said. Norvig clarified that it was not Berners-Lee or his group that he was referring to as incompetent, but the general user.[/quote] From an article posted on Slashdot, it appears that Google exec Peter Norvig thinks that the general computer
overall system performance for code that is so close to release Zoomba, A beta, no matter what number it may be should be considered close to release. Now, if it were RC2 I would concede your point but a beta is very much still in the works and it's probably still being built in debug mode
Just one question... Who can vote in the polls? It seems that I cannot, so I'm wondering if that's a boo-boo, or if I'm no longer able to vote.
The only problem with that approach BigDogBigFeet, is that the only way to update the status of the object would be in a busy loop or by using a sleep statement that only sleeps for 1ms at a time, which would essentially turn into a busy loop. With Phoon's approach I'd imagine the System Performance Meter code registers itself as a listener for the requested event so it is notified of state changes by the OS as opposed to having to poll for changes. It may not turn out to be a drag on performanc