[quote who="Ryat" reply="20" id="3553428"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 12 I agree to disagree. Logistics in place already does this. Logistics only limits the size of a fleet not how many ships total you can build.
[quote who="erischild" reply="17" id="3553421"] Quoting Achillus, reply 8 More options is always better. As an option at the beginning of the game, would be better. That wat if you want it, its there. If not, then ignore it. <br
[quote who="Achillus" reply="13" id="3553407"] Sometimes I just want to play a small game with limited warships. This way every warship I have actually means something. [/quote] Than limit yourself and not everyone else.
[quote who="Achillus" reply="11" id="3553403"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 9 I just have few words to add to this thread: NO WAY!!!!! DUMB IDEA! NO LIMITS! Doesn't add to the discussion. Nice to know that there's actually a report
[quote who="Ryat" reply="10" id="3553399"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 9 I just have few words to add to this thread: NO WAY!!!!! DUMB IDEA! NO LIMITS! If its set on options then there is no need for this rhetoric. Personally I like it. Would I always use it? No
I just have few words to add to this thread: NO WAY!!!!! DUMB IDEA! NO LIMITS! EDIT: Logistics already determines the number of ships you can fleet. What your proposing adds a cap to a cap that is already in place. This is why I think it's a dumb idea.
[quote who="grifter312" reply="1069" id="3548896"] Never posted before (but a longtime member!). But I have to! Holy cow these ship designs are absolutely fantastic! MrStarTrek - I'm a huge fan of your designs - stunning (guess it helps I'm also a Star Trek fan)! I can't wait for the steam workshop and I hope you publish them. Hamilmac - those are also very cool ships - I love dragons! I wish I could name everyone
I think its time to lock up this thread. Brad has already stated from yesterdays Dev's stream he is not going to nerf stacking sensors since he uses sensor boats himself. Now with that said I am unsubbing from this thread because it has now become a pointless debate
[quote who="node10" reply="178" id="3549144"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 172 Just wait until someone fleets several scouts and you see the same issue you are all complaining about with one sensor ship. I am sure someone going to say no sensors on scouts because fleeting makes sensors overpowered. I should do this
[quote who="JorgenCAB" reply="174" id="3549074"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 172 Just wait until someone fleets several scouts and you see the same issue your complaining about with one sensor ship. I am sure someone going to say no sensors on scouts because fleeting makes sensors overpowered. I should do this jus
[quote who="JorgenCAB" reply="173" id="3549071"] Why don't you answer his question... is that so hard. The quesion is not why starbases is in the game, it is why starbes sensors is in the game? Why not answer the actual question for once? [/quote] Listen here Mr. DENSE. I answered his question and once again you reject the answer I gave. Starbases whether or not the senors on them preform poorly are still an important part of the game for min
Just wait until someone fleets several scouts and you see the same issue you are all complaining about with one sensor ship. I am sure someone going to say no sensors on scouts because fleeting makes sensors overpowered. I should do this just to prove my point.
[quote who="SadfaceSquirtle" reply="170" id="3549044"] So, why are sensor upgrades for starbases in the game, if they are never a meaningful choice to begin with? Trick beginners? [/quote] Simply because Star bases are still an important part of the game whether or not you build a sensor ship.
[quote who="Maiden666" reply="162" id="3548928"] The good news for us is that the modding capacity of this game is tremendous and with some dedication, all of us are going to play the personally perfect balanced game anyway. [/quote] It is for the reason you stated above I do not feel your point is valid since you are going to either mod in diminished returns on sensors or mod sensors on star bases. I really do not see the problem with increasing the range to
[quote who="JorgenCAB" reply="153" id="3548811"] Quoting Nastytang, reply 152 And who gets to say this I ask again???? Your math don`t proves anything other then you know algebra ConGratz on THAT!!! the sensors on the ships that are stack as
[quote who="JorgenCAB" reply="150" id="3548803"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 149 They considered star base sensors broke when they found out sensors ships could be built. Spock says that is the only logical conclusion. And the relevance
[quote who="Nastytang" reply="146" id="3548790"] Quoting JorgenCAB, reply 140 It can be nerfed through mods anyway, so you will have it eventually... [e digicons];)[/e] Mods usually make games better and some times even fix imbalances and changes play that cater to a different audience better
[quote who="Vidszhite" reply="1062" id="3548785"] Quoting Xydonus, reply 1060 Awesome stuff! Been trying to make them using Drengin parts but not been having any luck with that. Would you be willing to send me your star destroyer ship/ships so I can use them in my game? [e digicons]:)[/e] <br
[quote who="Maiden666" reply="143" id="3548704"] Quoting MrStarTrek, reply 141 Strike up one for freedom to have choice in the game!!!! WOOT! The current situation makes sensormodules on spacestations a NOCHOICE and cargosensorships MANDATORY in competetive play. I see absolutely no meaningful
[quote who="Franco fx" reply="137" id="3548656"] LOL, Brad says on livestream there will be no nerfing of sensors. He builds them himself all the time. [/quote] Strike up one for freedom to have choice in the game!!!! WOOT!
[quote who="Franco fx" reply="134" id="3548640"] I am happy to come out for better sensors on star bases. I do not like leaving modules unbuilt because they are not worth the effort and star base sensors are worthless at this time. I think you should get 8-10 radius at the highest tech level. [/quote] I second that! Sensor ships are not the problem it's the star bases that are underpowered!!!!
GalCiv3 Forums
Stardock Forums